Online Now 3152

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1832
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3204
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Over signing rule ?

  • The rule should be that you can cut any player after the season is over, but the school has to pay his full tuition until he graduates (if he remains at that institution). If he chooses to transfer he should be immediately eligible at the school he transfers to.

    kezki

  • VaHorn said...

    Actually, no. We are just pointing out that we signed 95 to get our 85 and you signed 140.

    free laughter....thanks

    im always amused at the number of people that cant grasp the simplicty of the 25/85 rule (especially on a recruiting site).
    and even more so that the same people cant grasp the mere fact that the rule applies to every D1 school.

    one NASCAR official said," a stock car is a stock car but some are just better at putting them together."

    Crimson_Ghost

  • Crimson_Ghost said...

    free laughter....thanks

    im always amused at the number of people that cant grasp the simplicty of the 25/85 rule (especially on a recruiting site).
    and even more so that the same people cant grasp the mere fact that the rule applies to every D1 school.

    one NASCAR official said," a stock car is a stock car but some are just better at putting them together."

    Actually, it looks like Van Horn understands it better than you.

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • choog said...

    That's BS in my opinion. If you don't perform, you get your scholarship cut. I had an academic scholarship cut for not performing, why should it be different with football. You're getting a free education. You can stay on the team, just not on scholarship.

    Academic scholarships have specific criteria that you need to abide by in order to keep it. For athletic scholarships, coaches can simply cut a kid for not liking him. They can cut a kid even if he is performing well, but not as good as a guy in front of him. It is WAY too subjective.

    getmyjive11

  • choog said...

    That's not what we intend to do. We plan on signing them all, except those that don't qualify.

    Sorry wasn't speaking of this specific case or saying that's what you guys were going to do. Just wanted to clarify with those pro over signing that they have no problem with that situation. Seems unfair to the kids imo

    ducklefty

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Actually, it looks like Van Horn understands it better than you.

    approx. 140 scholarship players agree. lol

    Crimson_Ghost

  • Crimson_Ghost said...

    free laughter....thanks

    im always amused at the number of people that cant grasp the simplicty of the 25/85 rule (especially on a recruiting site).
    and even more so that the same people cant grasp the mere fact that the rule applies to every D1 school.

    one NASCAR official said," a stock car is a stock car but some are just better at putting them together."

    If it were not for Alabama, I doubt that oversigning.com would exist.

    Alabama’s March to 85 Finished?

    Updated with new numbers.

    Here is what appears to be the final shake down on Alabama's post NSD attrition this year. Much like last year, Alabama is one of the few teams in the country to lose double-digit players post NSD. Quick, name another school that has lost 21 scholarships players between NSD and August over the last 2 years. That's an entire recruiting class. And 6 of those 21 were medical hardships. Here is the attrition for Alabama between National Signing Day and the August deadline to get to 85 players for the last two years. Any way you slice it that is a lot of attrition. For comparison's sake, Penn State has had 2 players leave their program over the last two years during this period of time.

    VaHorn

  • getmyjive11 said...

    Academic scholarships have specific criteria that you need to abide by in order to keep it. For athletic scholarships, coaches can simply cut a kid for not liking him. They can cut a kid even if he is performing well, but not as good as a guy in front of him. It is WAY too subjective.

    and that's the way it SHOULD be. that's life. if you don't want to deal with reality....go to a crap program where you are All World. but if you go to the big dog programs, you will get cut if you are not performing at the level required. because after all, the only reason you have free schooling is due to ATHLETIC performance NOT academic. you are free to pursue an academic scholarship should your athletic one be dropped.

    signature image

    10 Major Poll National Titles (CFB record) 35 Bowl Wins (CFB record) 61 Wins over last 5 years (CFB record)

    coolstorybro

  • VaHorn said...

    If it were not for Alabama, I doubt that oversigning.com would exist.

    Alabama’s March to 85 Finished?

    Updated with new numbers.

    Here is what appears to be the final shake down on Alabama's post NSD attrition this year. Much like last year, Alabama is one of the few teams in the country to lose double-digit players post NSD. Quick, name another school that has lost 21 scholarships players between NSD and August over the last 2 years. That's an entire recruiting class. And 6 of those 21 were medical hardships. Here is the attrition for Alabama between National Signing Day and the August deadline to get to 85 players for the last two years. Any way you slice it that is a lot of attrition. For comparison's sake, Penn State has had 2 players leave their program over the last two years during this period of time.

    nice spin, where is the number of early entries into the NFL,early-grad seniors,transfers (looking for more playing time) that start elsewhere (like Texas*),
    3 medical hardships per year ? that number is astronomically high compared to what 2 for everyone else ?lol

    oversigning.com = AJC(rag) = Marsha's Village Reports = a team publicly refusing to play A&M in a Bowl game that they couldnt even reach blank.

    Crimson_Ghost

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    The way the SEC works the system they end up signing what amounts to 5 classes (approx 20 extra players) every 4 years and weed out the players that don't perform.

    It is one of the 2 main reasons (the schedule being the other) for the SEC success this past decade. That's why it causes so much anger and denial from a lot of tBB. They defend this practice because they know they have to do it to win big.

    To the OP, this subject is very taboo around here, which just shows how real the problem is.

    This has proven to be correct, only those drinking the kool-aid fail to acknowledge this.

    OHIO Joe142969

  • #'s crunch crunch, google google coffee

    Crimson_Ghost

  • Crimson_Ghost said...

    some of the things i read on a "football recruiting site" just makes me laugh out loud. its one of the sole reasons i subscribe.

    let me try & ease the sniffles some have over the term "oversigning".
    a) no one can over sign (25/85)
    b) every D1 team must abide by the exact same "basic math" system (25/85).

    About as funny as teams grey shirting perfectly healthy players???

    Look - bottom line if a kid is willing to go to a school with no guarantees and the school is fine with giving him a shot with the option to keep him or put him back out on the street...who can judge the school if the NCAA allows it.

    Here is a test to either shut everyone up or prove the rules are being broke intentionally - go back and add the players from an SEC school for 4 years - check year to year what kids were retained and what kids departed. If the kid leaves and does not transfer..why?

    Should not be too hard to figure out.

    Leppycole

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...
    The way the SEC works the system they end up signing what amounts to 5 classes (approx 20 extra players) every 4 years and weed out the players that don't perform.
    It is one of the 2 main reasons (the schedule being the other) for the SEC success this past decade.

    OH-IO Joe said...
    This has proven to be correct, only those drinking the kool-aid fail to acknowledge this.

    a) "85" is 85 not 95, not 105, not 140.... really its 85.
    b) NSD L.O.I. are not signed scholarships they are .....Letters of Intent. its one of the sole reasons we dont call them SS's(signed scholarships) on NSD.
    c) the SEC shouldnt be blamed for 5 of the past 6 (7 of 8) opponents they were forced to play on the schedule in the NCG. coffee

    Crimson_Ghost

  • coolstorybro said...

    and that's the way it SHOULD be. that's life. if you don't want to deal with reality....go to a crap program where you are All World. but if you go to the big dog programs, you will get cut if you are not performing at the level required. because after all, the only reason you have free schooling is due to ATHLETIC performance NOT academic. you are free to pursue an academic scholarship should your athletic one be dropped.

    If the NCAA was serious about having true student athletes, they would do the things I said. You simply have a different view of how things should be (the SEC view).

    getmyjive11

  • VaHorn said...

    If it were not for Alabama, I doubt that oversigning.com would exist.

    Alabama’s March to 85 Finished?

    Updated with new numbers.

    Here is what appears to be the final shake down on Alabama's post NSD attrition this year. Much like last year, Alabama is one of the few teams in the country to lose double-digit players post NSD. Quick, name another school that has lost 21 scholarships players between NSD and August over the last 2 years. That's an entire recruiting class. And 6 of those 21 were medical hardships. Here is the attrition for Alabama between National Signing Day and the August deadline to get to 85 players for the last two years. Any way you slice it that is a lot of attrition. For comparison's sake, Penn State has had 2 players leave their program over the last two years during this period of time.

    Your numbers are way, way off for Penn State.

    getmyjive11

  • VaHorn said...

    If it were not for Alabama, I doubt that oversigning.com would exist.

    Alabama’s March to 85 Finished?

    Updated with new numbers.

    Here is what appears to be the final shake down on Alabama's post NSD attrition this year. Much like last year, Alabama is one of the few teams in the country to lose double-digit players post NSD. Quick, name another school that has lost 21 scholarships players between NSD and August over the last 2 years. That's an entire recruiting class. And 6 of those 21 were medical hardships. Here is the attrition for Alabama between National Signing Day and the August deadline to get to 85 players for the last two years. Any way you slice it that is a lot of attrition. For comparison's sake, Penn State has had 2 players leave their program over the last two years during this period of time.

    Bama signed seven more players than Texas over the course of four years. We've had more players than that leave early for the NFL draft over that time-span. Also not included in the phantom numbers provided by the hack on Oversigning.com are how many of our guys are JUCO and go pro after only two years instead of four.

    LULZ the butthurt ITT is great. All the fanbases from other conferences are mad that we don't share our recruits in the south.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Macdaddy7930

  • Leppycole said...

    About as funny as teams grey shirting perfectly healthy players???

    bottom line ? (grayshirts arent always "injured players".)

    i would have loved to see Bama get 3* OG Spencer "Flipper" Region in 2011 as a grey shirt. he would have spent his first 3-6 months on campus w/ his own dime & then been eligible to redshirt.

    in short, he could have entered 2013 as a 21+ year old 6-6 350 lb redshirt freshman man-child w/ nearly two years in / around the system & a full four to play.

    someone must have agreed w/ me because Clemson gave him a full ride.

    Crimson_Ghost

  • getmyjive11 said...

    If the NCAA was serious about having true student athletes, they would do the things I said. You simply have a different view of how things should be (the SEC view).

    no i have a realistic view. you sign a LOI for free schooling based on your ability to play football. that is the only reason a player gets a football scholarship. if the player isn't up to par a year later....drop him. He is free to go about any of the other means regular nonathletic students use to obtain free schooling. by being dropped from an athletic scholarship, the player isn't sentenced to never graduating.

    The whole notion that by being good at football in high school should somehow give a kid the right to an entire 4 year degree for free is stupid. this isn't kindergarten where every gets a pass.

    signature image

    10 Major Poll National Titles (CFB record) 35 Bowl Wins (CFB record) 61 Wins over last 5 years (CFB record)

    coolstorybro

  • Macdaddy7930 said...

    Oversigning.com are how many of our guys are JUCO and go pro after only two years instead of four.

    You do have a point here about JC kids.A school like Kansas State, if you just look at the numbers, they look kind of like Alabama in terms of over signing, but you gotta factor in they sign a ton of JC kids, not just a few.

    Georgia might look like Alabama this year when they sign 32, but they only have 53 scholarship players returning, so that wouldn't be over signing. Plus, Richt has already publicly spoke out against over signing.

    I think that coaches that do it should have to put out this disclaimer- ( using Saban as an example ) who has been averaging approx 27 recruits each year for more than 4 years, which puts the # at about 107-108 every 4 years ]

    Disclaimer "Hi, coach Saban here, we would like to offer you a FB scholarship to play for Alabama. Granted about 21% or 1 of every 5 recruits that sign with us will be kicked off or forced off the team over the next 4 years, but hey, the good news is about 79-80% of you won't get cut from the team. So are you ready to commit to the Tide, because we are committed to you; well at least 80% committed."

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    You do have a point here about JC kids.A school like Kansas State, if you just look at the numbers, they look kind of like Alabama in terms of over signing, but you gotta factor in they sign a ton of JC kids, not just a few.

    Georgia might look like Alabama this year when they sign 32, but they only have 53 scholarship players returning, so that wouldn't be over signing. Plus, Richt has already publicly spoke out against over signing.

    I think that coaches that do it should have to put out this disclaimer- ( using Saban as an example ) who has been averaging approx 27 recruits each year for more than 4 years, which puts the # at about 107-108 every 4 years ]

    Disclaimer "Hi, coach Saban here, we would like to offer you a FB scholarship to play for Alabama. Granted about 21% or 1 of every 5 recruits that sign with us will be kicked off or forced off the team over the next 4 years, but hey, the good news is about 79-80% of you won't get cut from the team. So are you ready to commit to the Tide, because we are committed to you; well at least 80% committed."

    Just like Kiffin lying to Massington about his scholly.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Macdaddy7930

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    You do have a point here about JC kids.A school like Kansas State, if you just look at the numbers, they look kind of like Alabama in terms of over signing, but you gotta factor in they sign a ton of JC kids, not just a few.

    Georgia might look like Alabama this year when they sign 32, but they only have 53 scholarship players returning, so that wouldn't be over signing. Plus, Richt has already publicly spoke out against over signing.

    I think that coaches that do it should have to put out this disclaimer- ( using Saban as an example ) who has been averaging approx 27 recruits each year for more than 4 years, which puts the # at about 107-108 every 4 years ]

    Disclaimer "Hi, coach Saban here, we would like to offer you a FB scholarship to play for Alabama. Granted about 21% or 1 of every 5 recruits that sign with us will be kicked off or forced off the team over the next 4 years, but hey, the good news is about 79-80% of you won't get cut from the team. So are you ready to commit to the Tide, because we are committed to you; well at least 80% committed."

    go read up on Christian Jones. Prior to committing to Alabama he said in an interview that he knew every year at Alabama he and every other player would be evaluated for inclusion for the next year. He said he loved it. That's what a system like this gives you.....the best from every player....there is no complacency because your spot is not promised. The kids know it going in and want it. So, what's the problem again?

    signature image

    10 Major Poll National Titles (CFB record) 35 Bowl Wins (CFB record) 61 Wins over last 5 years (CFB record)

    coolstorybro

  • Macdaddy7930 said...

    Just like Kiffin lying to Massington about his scholly.

    Let's not drag St. Kiffin down into this filthy seedy underbelly of Saban's world of over signing. Just look at Massington's tweets.

    Sure doesn't sound like a guy that was lied to. In fact, sounds like just the opposite, like Kiffin was straight forward with him, but only those 2 would know what was said, well besides you, since you obviously were there. Where did hide?

    Does Kiffin ever get mad at you for 'hidin & ridin' on his nuts like that,
    ball sniffer.

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Let's not drag St. Kiffin down into this filthy seedy underbelly of Saban's world of over signing. Just look at Massington's tweets.

    Sure doesn't sound like a guy that was lied to. In fact, sounds like just the opposite, like Kiffin was straight forward with him, but only those 2 would know what was said, well besides you, since you obviously were there. Where did hide?

    Does Kiffin ever get mad at you for 'hidin & ridin' on his nuts like that,
    ball sniffer.

    Oh he's happy now, but according to his coaches and people around their program, Kiffin lied and screwed the kid over. Needless to say Kiffin won't be welcome back in Mesquite for awhile.

    Hope you enjoyed 7-5 because it won't get much better. Saban, on the other hand, is coaching in his 3rd Natty in four years. Maybe you should worry about you own pitiful program and get off Saban's and the rest of the SEC's nuts. Keep the excuses up though and deflect.

    Haters gonna hate. Hilarious!!!!

    signature image signature image signature image

    Macdaddy7930

  • USMCAG said...

    It still exists, you just failed to do your research. It is easier to make an ignorant argument than to find the real facts.

    lol nice avatar pic kettle

    signature image

    'Just to make it clear, I'm not transferring, I like it here too damn much to leave.' Jordan Kerner

    ejb5212

  • USMCAG said...

    It still exists, you just failed to do your research. It is easier to make an ignorant argument than to find the real facts.

    What research needs to be gone? Holes were found... that's all there is to it... there NO WAY someone should be able to sign 34 people in 1 class..... that's damn near 1/2 your team!

    I personally dont have an issue with it... do I think its unfair? yes, but lots of things are unfair in life. so screw it! Things will eventually work itself out (whether other conf raise the limit or whatever the case is).

    I know if I was in the SEC, I would do the EXACT same thing.... work EVERY advantage you can get! That's why they are the best, as much as I hate to say it.

    This post was edited by OHSethIO on 12/12/2012 at 4:26 AM

    signature image

    Pissing Michigan fans off since 1987!

    OHSethIO