Online Now 3247

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1546
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3455
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Playing in the SEC or Pac12 better prepares RB's for the NFL ?

  • BetterOff said...

    I see your point. I just figure that in every major conference, a top level DE would at least see 2 or 3 offensive tackles that could challenge them. Sure, they would have a lot of mismatched opponents as well. It's why I always would judge player on what they did when matched with other elite talents. Of course, this season a lot of top DL talent got shoved around by Bama's OL, so maybe don't pay that much attention to that type of elite competition. biggrin

    On that topic, I have never seen an OL like the one we had. 2 guys that could have been starting for a lot of NFL teams, another that could have started for a handful, and a true So LT that will probably be the best of the bunch. Our pitiful little RG never get talked about or mentioned and he'll be a mid-rounder or so next year as well.

    Having said that, they make RBs look downright amazing as well, which is why although Lacy is being talked about at possibly the first RB selected now, he is still going to have a great combine to secure that position, IMO.

    Bama's O-Line drool

    brem22

  • BetterOff said...

    Actually doing a little research into today's NFL could help a little bit. shrug

    Top 20 QBs in passer rating

    SEC 4
    Big12 3
    B1G 3
    ACC 3
    FCS 3
    PAC12 2
    MAC 1
    MWC 1
    BE 0

    Top 20 RBs by yards

    SEC 5
    Big12 3
    PAC12 3
    ACC 2
    CUSA 2
    BE 2
    Indy 1
    MWC 1
    B1G 1

    Top 30 WRs by yards

    ACC 6
    FCS 5
    Big12 5
    SEC 5
    B1G 3
    CUSA 2
    MWC 1
    MAC 1
    BE 1
    Indy 1
    PAC12 0

    Top 10 TE by yards

    ACC 3
    PAC12 2
    B1G 2
    SEC 1
    Big12 1
    BE 1

    Myth Busted, IMO

    I rest my case

    signature image signature image signature image

    future bulldog

    deltadawg82

  • deltadawg82 said...

    I rest my case

    Yup, you aren't the only surprised that the Pac12 running backs avg 4.5 ypc compared to only 4.0 for the SEC in the NFL the last 2 years.

    I wonder why SEC backs struggle so much in the NFL nowadays. Especially guys like Ingram and Richardson. 3.9 and 3.6 ypc just doesnt cut it.

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Yup, you aren't the only surprised that the Pac12 running backs avg 4.5 ypc compared to only 4.0 for the SEC in the NFL the last 2 years.

    I wonder why SEC backs struggle so much in the NFL nowadays. Especially guys like Ingram and Richardson. 3.9 and 3.6 ypc just doesnt cut it.

    Same reason Reggie bush sucked in NO. They are a passing team that cant run block. He averaged under 4 YPC his first three years. PAC 12 rbs aren't better prepared and neither are SEC backs. It's RB, you either have it or you don't. Easiest position to project and other than the outstanding goats, it has a lot to do with your line and passing game. I just lmao at you spending so much time coming up with crazy stats to support arguments that most people don't give two shits about. You have no life.

    gamecockguy12

  • gamecockguy12 said...

    Same reason Reggie bush sucked in NO. They are a passing team that cant run block. He averaged under 4 YPC his first three years. PAC 12 rbs aren't better prepared and neither are SEC backs. It's RB, you either have it or you don't. Easiest position to project and other than the outstanding goats, it has a lot to do with your line and passing game. I just lmao at you spending so much time coming up with crazy stats to support arguments that most people don't give two shits about. You have no life.

    Maybe it would have took you a lot of time to figure it out because you are special ed, but for the rest of us, it only takes 5-10 mins to look at the stats and see that almost every SEC back in the NFL averaged under 4 yards per carry this past year and most of the backs from the Pac avg 4.7 or 4.5 or 4.3.

    Its not just Bush, special ed, its like 6 or 7 guys. Can u count that high?

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Over the last 2 NFL seasons.
    Taking the 12 SEC running backs with the most carries/yards.

    12 SEC RB's
    ===========
    3,557 carries
    14,505 yards
    4.1 yards per carry

    PAC 12 RB's
    ==========
    3,366 carries
    15,011 yards
    4.5 Yards per carry

    Over the last 2 NFL seasons there are only 4 SEC and 4 Pac12 running backs that
    each have over 300 carries and over 1300 yards. (The best 4 from each)
    SEC 4
    =======
    1,794 carries
    7,434 yards
    4.1 yards per carry

    PAC 4
    ======
    1,989 carries
    9,073 yards
    4.6 yards per carry

    This year, of running backs who gained at least 250 yards,
    only 3 SEC backs averaged as much as 4.0 yards per carry.
    Ridley 4.4
    Tate 4.3
    Foster 4.1

    The rest all under 4.0 ypc
    Green-Ellis 3.9, Ballard 3.9, Ingram 3.9, Moreno 3.8,
    F. Jones 3.6, Richardson 3.6, Hillis 3.6, McFadden 3.3.

    Of RB's who gained more than 250 yards,
    the PAC had 7 of 9 average 4.0 yards or more per carry
    A few examples are;
    Forsett 5.9, Lynch 5.0, Jones-Drew 4.8, Bush 4.3, S.Jackson 4.1.

    Almost half of a yard per carry better over the last 2 NFL seasons. That is a gigantic difference.
    So we can put the "SEC better prepares RB's for the NFL" Hogwash to bed.

    Blue chip high school running backs in the south should take notice of this.
    The numbers show that former Pac12 RB's are averaging a half yard per carry more than their SEC counterparts in the NFL, which means in the coming years, NFL teams will continue to draft what has been successful,
    and more and more will draft Pac12 running backs.

    So, elite RB's, come on out to the west coast and increase your chances of big time NFL success.

    It took you five minutes to find the stats, do that math, and type out this post?

    And "maybe it would have took you," in a post where you call me special Ed.

    This post was edited by gamecockguy12 on 1/11/2013 at 10:12 AM

    gamecockguy12

  • gamecockguy12 said...

    It took you five minutes to find the stats, do that math, and type out this post?

    And "maybe it would have took you," in a post where you call me special Ed.


    Well, I'm special ed English, but I cheated my way out of special ed Math.

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • Without looking at the numbers i would have to say look at YAC. There will be a difference between the pac-12 RBs and the SEC RBs, that will help people understand the difference in the YPC numbers. The SEC is better fitted for big backs, while the pac-12 is better fitted for scat backs with high end speed. Therefore you will see a higher YPC from Pac-12 RBs, but SEC RBs will have better YAC. Depending on the system (Ingram), Oline, and being the only legit playmaker on your team (Richardson) all come into play. Bigger RBs will choose to play in the SEC because of the style of play. The NFL will draft a RB by his style of play, and if he fits their system. They sometimes fail to do that and pick Ingram to run behind a pass blocking Oline. Its not about which one prepares you more, its about what system you think you may fit in better. And if you look at our RBs you will see the type we like, big, physical, combined with being a rare athlete (Richardson, Ingram, Coffee, Lacy, Yeldon, Fowler, Jones, Henry, Tenpenny, Drake). There are exception as we may see next year with Dee Hart, but as we have seen he has not seen the field very much and mainly due to injuries.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Jos Mit

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Ya, I actually took some time to look this up.....

    USC has ZERO Super Bowl winning QB's. cool

    Crimson_Ghost

  • Crimson_Ghost said...

    USC has ZERO Super Bowl winning QB's. cool

    What does the fact that USC QB's drafted since 2000 have passed for 50,000 more yards and 300 plus more TD's 's in the NFL than QB's from Alabama- have to do with the fact that the Pac12 has been producing better NFL running backs than the SEC ?

    Other than Bush > than Ingram, I don't see the connection.

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • Jos Mit said...

    Without looking at the numbers i would have to say look at YAC. There will be a difference between the pac-12 RBs and the SEC RBs, that will help people understand the difference in the YPC numbers. The SEC is better fitted for big backs, while the pac-12 is better fitted for scat backs with high end speed. Therefore you will see a higher YPC from Pac-12 RBs, but SEC RBs will have better YAC. Depending on the system (Ingram), Oline, and being the only legit playmaker on your team (Richardson) all come into play. Bigger RBs will choose to play in the SEC because of the style of play. The NFL will draft a RB by his style of play, and if he fits their system. They sometimes fail to do that and pick Ingram to run behind a pass blocking Oline. Its not about which one prepares you more, its about what system you think you may fit in better. And if you look at our RBs you will see the type we like, big, physical, combined with being a rare athlete (Richardson, Ingram, Coffee, Lacy, Yeldon, Fowler, Jones, Henry, Tenpenny, Drake). There are exception as we may see next year with Dee Hart, but as we have seen he has not seen the field very much and mainly due to injuries.

    So based on what your saying here is that SEC backs have more yards after contact because Pac12 backs are so fast defenders can't even get contact with them and that's why the Pac12 backs have better YPC.

    Hmm, interesting theory. I guess the NFL should just draft Pac12 backs then, why even bother with those SEC backs since they are so easy to hit.

    Hard to find a good excuse for SEC backs not performing at the same high level as Pac12 backs, but I'll give you an A for effort.

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • NcaaAssassinG13 knows...

    about ZERO Super Bowl winning QB's.

    sorry Ass13 i just had to. cheers

    Crimson_Ghost

  • Crimson_Ghost said...

    about ZERO Super Bowl winning QB's.

    sorry Ass13 i just had to. cheers

    It's all good Rim son.

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • Crimson_Ghost