Online Now 3452

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1912
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3455
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Questions I have about about Jesus...

  • MildReTIDEation said...

    There is no downside to being a good Christian. I am a good person too, but I have trouble wrapping my head around the story we are told. I have too many questions. I struggle with the faith part of it.

    I can't help that I don't 100% believe. It isn't fun thinking that there may not be an afterlife. It is a sickening feeling if I really dwell on it, but that doesn't make it easier to believe everything about Christianity. I still hope that I run into someone that has the answers for me. Some of the people in this thread have been helpful.

    Turning off the doubts in my mind would make everything much easier to process, but this is how I am made.

    The fact that your looking for answers means your on the right path. Best wishes in your quest. The one thing that brings me into focus is to sit out at night away from city lights and wonder in amazment at our Solar System. I see that and I just feel that didnt happen by chance.

    signature image signature image signature image

    And because Auburn men and women believe in these things, I believe in Auburn and love it. -George Petrie (1945)

    Turn2

  • Turn2 said...

    You should believe because you want to. You know - hope for a better world, faith, and way of seeing things in a different light. Im not one to push it on you but I would suggest that if Catholicism didn't do it for you try Baptist or Methodist. You'll find evedyone is just like you looling for answers. For me it helps me stay focused on doing the right thing by my fellow man thats all; just feeling like trying to love life and make a difference. May no mistake Im no saint and make many mistakes.

    I pretty much stopped being a Catholic over 10 years ago. The cover ups of child molesting priest was pretty much the icing on the cake. Especially since I found out the the Pastor of my church was previously accused of molesting a child in the 70's, but still allowed to be a pastor. He was my Pastor when I was just a kid too (in the late 80's and early 90's).

    MildReTIDEation

  • weagle247 said...

    Why can't you be kind and good for the sake of being kind and good? Why do you have to get some reward? And if you are doing it out of fear, then you aren't doing it for the right reasons...

    There is always a reward to being kind and good. You know a feeling inside.

    signature image signature image signature image

    And because Auburn men and women believe in these things, I believe in Auburn and love it. -George Petrie (1945)

    Turn2

  • ilovelamp51 said...

    Out of curiousity, what part of Jesus coming to the Earth as the son of God, living a perfect life, dying for our sins on a cross & ascending to Heaven to be at the right hand of God do you find most hard to accept? NOT flaming. I'm really interested in knowing bc that is the meat & potatoes of Christianity... A lot of the rest doesn't really affect me one way or the other.

    I have trouble with believing in the "supernatural" part of all of it.

    There isn't any evidence of anything supernatural ever happening at anytime. I mean REAL evidence. Not stories of how praying made a tumor disappear type stuff. Not crediting Jesus for surviving a car accident type stuff. I am fine with people having these beliefs, but it isn't something that I can use as evidence personally.

    In today's world, everyone has a camera and there are zero miracles/Jesus/God/Satan/Angels being recorded. Why were all the visual miracles limited to the times in the Bible? That is the type of stuff that makes me have serious doubts.

    MildReTIDEation

  • ilovelamp51 said...

    Not talking down on Catholics bc I know several who are devout Christians but a lot of the Catholic church is lost IMO. They seem to be more interested in rituals than in a relationship with Christ. Not saying any denomination is perfect but you should try another church if you havent already.

    Your criticism is fair. Catholicism is very structured. Mass becomes more of a routine/duty than worship.

    I am trying another church. My wife and her family are Methodist. I like the fellowship and community there. I am still working on the beliefs part it.

    MildReTIDEation

  • MildReTIDEation said...

    Your criticism is fair. Catholicism is very structured. Mass becomes more of a routine/duty than worship.

    I am trying another church. My wife and her family are Methodist. I like the fellowship and community there. I am still working on the beliefs part it.

    Mind if I ask what city?

    signature image signature image signature image

    And because Auburn men and women believe in these things, I believe in Auburn and love it. -George Petrie (1945)

    Turn2

  • Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on your virtues. If there are gods but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones.

    signature image

    "As far as the downvotes. It's a gnat biting an lion" -- A member of tRCMB Justice League, taking the internet WAY WAY too seriously.

    Rocket_Play

  • Turn2 said...

    Mind if I ask what city?

    PM sent.

    MildReTIDEation

  • Rocket_Play said...

    Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on your virtues. If there are gods but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones.

    You just pretty much summed up my beliefs.

    MildReTIDEation

  • MildReTIDEation said...

    You just pretty much summed up my beliefs.

    Well I didn't write that, but the person that did is likely suffering eternal torment.

    signature image

    "As far as the downvotes. It's a gnat biting an lion" -- A member of tRCMB Justice League, taking the internet WAY WAY too seriously.

    Rocket_Play

  • MildReTIDEation said...

    I have trouble with believing in the "supernatural" part of all of it.

    There isn't any evidence of anything supernatural ever happening at anytime. I mean REAL evidence. Not stories of how praying made a tumor disappear type stuff. Not crediting Jesus for surviving a car accident type stuff. I am fine with people having these beliefs, but it isn't something that I can use as evidence personally.

    In today's world, everyone has a camera and there are zero miracles/Jesus/God/Satan/Angels being recorded. Why were all the visual miracles limited to the times in the Bible? That is the type of stuff that makes me have serious doubts.

    2 Corininthians 5:7 says we walk by faith not by sight. God overwhelming us with displays of supernatural events, or miracles, takes the faith out of it. God draws us to him, but we have to reach out too. Revelation 3:20 "Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me." God gives us the freedom to decide ourselves if we believe in him, if we want to reach out to him, or if we want to reject him.

    VTSmitty

  • VTSmitty said...

    2 Corininthians 5:7 says we walk by faith not by sight. God overwhelming us with displays of supernatural events, or miracles, takes the faith out of it. God draws us to him, but we have to reach out too. Revelation 3:20 "Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me." God gives us the freedom to decide ourselves if we believe in him, if we want to reach out to him, or if we want to reject him.

    But Jesus started it all with lots of displays of supernatural events and miracles. It doesn't seem fair to make everyone else rely only on faith considering the consequences (hell).

    MildReTIDEation

  • MildReTIDEation said...

    But Jesus started it all with lots of displays of supernatural events and miracles. It doesn't seem fair to make everyone else rely only on faith considering the consequences (hell).

    I can't argue with that. Those that were there first hand sure would seem to have had the advantage. But again, even then with him performing miracles, they hung him on a cross and crucified him. So, obviously even those that saw with their own eyes doubted. Another good example that supports what you are saying is, Saul of Tarsus. Dude was dedicated to the persecution of Christians. He was on his way to Damascus when God whacked him with a lightning bolt, and then the resurrected jesus appeared and said, you been killing my people and stuff, what's up with that. Saul was blind for 3 days, but you better know he changed his name to Paul and set out to evangalize the world when he got his sight back. So, the point is, it is certainly understandable that being hit with lightning and then then having Jesus talk personally with you, would definitely have an impact.

    I don't doubt the wisdom of having to rely soley on faith, but I cannot explain it, nor can I fully understand it.

    VTSmitty

  • Rocket_Play said...

    That awkward moment when someone totally misses your point and tries to argue something you're not arguing ( this goes to the response to me before you too) The winners re write history with myth to make their history seem grander than it actually was. This has happened within our lifetimes. You don't think it happened thousands of years ago? When education and communication were non existent?

    I understood your point, I just wanted to make one of my own. Respectfully, you don't seem to understand how we come to know history and historical figures. Certainly, as is said at the beginning of "Braveheart," winners often redact history to serve their purposes. The Egyptians are a good example of this. But, lots of novice historians think that this is the only way we come by history. When you have a wealth of manuscript evidences, from many different places and times, regarding a person or country, you can come to a reasonable certainty of who that person was. Jesus is the best example of this in all of history. We know exactly who He was and what many, many people claimed that He said and did. He is unique to history to say the least. You couldn't make Him up.

    signature image

    South Carolina Gamecocks. The 2010 National College Baseball Champs.

    goodnews

  • Rocket_Play said...

    Another good example of how early history of a religion is re written is L Ron Hubbard and Scientology. This is going on as I type this. You think it didn't happen 2000 years ago? These people claim to have super powers, but won't demonstrate it you just have to believe them.

    Respectfully, but L Ron Hubbard? Really?

    signature image

    South Carolina Gamecocks. The 2010 National College Baseball Champs.

    goodnews

  • ilovelamp51 said...

    I almost like your version better. Sign me up for a copy of VTSmitty translation...

    Well, that comes from Shahn Wilburn at Riverviewed Baptist church in Giles County Virgina. Shahn was a very educatad man, but he grew up in Giles county, and to keep people interested in the sermon, he would occassionally throw in that Giles County lingo. Reverend Shahn supported all his messages with the scripture, and even when giving a Giles County translation, he would always read the passage first, and then give the translation. He was interviewed on the news and asked what he thought about the judges recommendation to only display 6 of the commandments. This was immediately following the hearing, so he had no time to prepare an answer, and I thought he gave a good one. He said, as a preacher I don't believe I have the right to edit God's commandments. Of course he was speaking on his own behalf and not for the county.

    VTSmitty

  • goodnews said...

    Respectfully, but L Ron Hubbard? Really?

    Respectfully, yes. People believe him and have as much faith in his teaching as Jesus, and if you ask them about his history and compare it to his actual history, it's very different. If Scientology took over for say, the next 2000 years, which version of him do you think would survive?

    signature image

    "As far as the downvotes. It's a gnat biting an lion" -- A member of tRCMB Justice League, taking the internet WAY WAY too seriously.

    Rocket_Play

  • goodnews said...

    I understood your point, I just wanted to make one of my own. Respectfully, you don't seem to understand how we come to know history and historical figures. Certainly, as is said at the beginning of "Braveheart," winners often redact history to serve their purposes. The Egyptians are a good example of this. But, lots of novice historians think that this is the only way we come by history. When you have a wealth of manuscript evidences, from many different places and times, regarding a person or country, you can come to a reasonable certainty of who that person was. Jesus is the best example of this in all of history. We know exactly who He was and what many, many people claimed that He said and did. He is unique to history to say the least. You couldn't make Him up.

    Novice historian. I take it this is your full time job? Respectfully, I didn't say he didnt exist. I said his deeds and miracles didn't happen as described in the bible. That was made up after the fact to make the religion credible.

    signature image

    "As far as the downvotes. It's a gnat biting an lion" -- A member of tRCMB Justice League, taking the internet WAY WAY too seriously.

    Rocket_Play

  • Rocket_Play said...

    Novice historian. I take it this is your full time job? Respectfully, I didn't say he didnt exist. I said his deeds and miracles didn't happen as described in the bible. That was made up after the fact to make the religion credible.

    Typically, I wouldn't think you would make up stories about supernatural powers attributed to someone who was scourged and crucified on a cross.

    VTSmitty

  • AlwaysMore said...

    We have actual writings of Washington. Not just people writing down what he may or may not have said, but physical evidence of his writings.

    We have multiple artists creating multiple images of Washington, from various points in his life. Those images all have enough similarities that we can recognize what he looked like.

    We have writers of the day, from many different places, all whom wrote about Washingtons appearance and character traits. Hundreds more than Jesus of Nazareth.

    We have a multiple government and official documents, from French, American, British and other sources, that all mention Washington.

    We even have the remains of a body, buried in a clearly marked grave, right there in Mt. Vernon that, if forced to, we could dig up today.

    Outside of the four Gospels, there is no direct writings about Jesus. None of his actual writings, if he had any, have survived. No mention of Jesus has been found in any government or official documents from the era. No attempts at any artwork or images of Jesus from that era have been discovered.

    So what is this manuscript evidence you speak of?

    Always More,

    You are exactly right about GW. You couldn't be more wrong about Jesus. I don't know what your background in this is but you are terribly misinformed. I have researched it some and no one passes the tests of source criticism like Jesus of Nazareth, and not even close. And, to give you another reliable source, Anne Rice (the famous author) decided to write a book a few years ago on Jesus. As any good author she did her research. What she found shocked her. The manuscript evidence for Jesus was so overwhelmingly good, and the scholarship against him was so incredibly bad and dishonest, that she renounced her atheism and started going back to church. I respect your opinion, but please know what you're talking about before jumping to conclusions.

    signature image

    South Carolina Gamecocks. The 2010 National College Baseball Champs.

    goodnews

  • MildReTIDEation said...

    That brings up a solid point. I have always seen Jesus portrayed as a white man with brown hair. Is this what he really looked like? That look doesn't really seem too common in that region. Was this changed by the church? If so, what else was changed by them?

    Those are just the unfortunate European depictions of Jesus. For sure, he was a Jew and looked like a Jew.

    signature image

    South Carolina Gamecocks. The 2010 National College Baseball Champs.

    goodnews

  • MildReTIDEation said...

    But Jesus spoke in front of large crowds and performed miracles. He surely interacted with at least 100's of people right? I may be wrong.

    I didn't read the whole thing - but I wanted to address this. There are many passages in the Bible that talk about the multitudes of people who came to watch Jesus speak and perform miracles. Here are but a few:

    Five loaves and two fish: Matt 14:13-21; Mark 6:31-44; Luke 9:10-17; John 6:5-15
    Seven loaves and fish: Matt 15:32-39; Mark 8:1-9
    Zacchaeus climbs the fig to see Jesus: Luke 19:1-10

    Matt 8:18 "Now when Jesus saw great crowds around him, he gave orders to go over to the other side."
    Mark 5:21 And when Jesus had crossed again in the boat to the other side, a great crowd gathered about him; and he was beside the sea."

    That took me about 3 minutes to find all of that.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Nod4Eight

  • goodnews said...

    Always More,

    You are exactly right about GW. You couldn't be more wrong about Jesus. I don't know what your background in this is but you are terribly misinformed. I have researched it some and no one passes the tests of source criticism like Jesus of Nazareth, and not even close. And, to give you another reliable source, Anne Rice (the famous author) decided to write a book a few years ago on Jesus. As any good author she did her research. What she found shocked her. The manuscript evidence for Jesus was so overwhelmingly good, and the scholarship against him was so incredibly bad and dishonest, that she renounced her atheism and started going back to church. I respect your opinion, but please know what you're talking about before jumping to conclusions.

    Okay, what do you mean by manuscript evidence? There are no Roman reports on him. He is never mentioned in any official government documents that have survived. The only writings about Jesus and his life, that I know of, are in the four gospels. Is there something I am missing?

    None of the things I listed about Washington are in evidence for Jesus. Are you talking about The Dead Sea Scrolls? There is not a lot about Christianity in them, despite the popular culture myths about them. What is this evidence you speak of?

    AlwaysMore

  • the Pauline Epistles give the best evidence about Jesus the man and healer - they were written several decades before the 4 gospels ( 2 of which : Mathew and John which were written by eyewitnesses ) ; roman Tacitus a historian from the ancient world wrote about " the Christ " and followers and their persection by Pontius Pilot and finally Flavius Josephus , famous Jewish historian , wrote about James whose brother was called Christ

    signature image

    shoeless7777

  • AlwaysMore said...

    Okay, what do you mean by manuscript evidence? There are no Roman reports on him. He is never mentioned in any official government documents that have survived. The only writings about Jesus and his life, that I know of, are in the four gospels. Is there something I am missing?

    None of the things I listed about Washington are in evidence for Jesus. Are you talking about The Dead Sea Scrolls? There is not a lot about Christianity in them, despite the popular culture myths about them. What is this evidence you speak of?

    the dead sea scrolls that were released in 1991 refer directly to the New Testament and to the life of Jesus Christ ; these scrolls actually mention the crucifixion of Jesus Christ as well as the Christ who died for the sins of many

    signature image

    shoeless7777