-
NcaaAssassinG13
- 4 stars Rating: 75
2280 votes total - Letterman
- (2385)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13
- 4 stars Rating: 75
2280 votes total - Letterman
- (2385)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13
- 4 stars Rating: 75
2280 votes total - Letterman
- (2385)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13 said...
The SEC has 8 teams with winning records - combined vs other over .500 AQ teams they are (19-16) 35 games (9-8 on the road) 17 road games
The PAC also has 8 teams with winning records - combined vs other over .500 AQ teams they are (27-26) 53 games (11-15 on the road) 26 road games
The numbers here are interesting - The PAC's 8 winning teams have played 53 games against other winning AQ teams compared to just 35 games for the 8 winning SEC teams.
18 more games/ 9 more road games - that's a gigantic difference in favor of the Pac12.
Stouds1
- 5 stars Rating: 86
1380 votes total - Varsity
- (1699)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13
- 4 stars Rating: 75
2280 votes total - Letterman
- (2385)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13 said...
i'm butthurt about the SEC.
meaningless #'s are meaningless #'s, no matter how you shake it up.
the SEC Champ will once again play(and likely win) in the NCG & have what 6 teams ranked among the top 10.
my point ? how many teams (that matter) start the season and say " i sure hope we beat most of the sub .500 teams this year." ?
Crimson_Ghost
- 5 stars Rating: 81
2156 votes total - Redshirt
- (3929)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
GeorgiaBoy
- 5 stars Rating: 89
1032 votes total - 5 Star Recruit
- Varsity
- (1134)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
theharbinater
- 5 stars Rating: 92
844 votes total - Varsity
- (1560)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
theharbinater said...
his stats are wrong anyway, or incomplete at least.
for example, most played vs >.500 ac teams are:
1. USC 8-(3-5-0)--0.37500
1. Arizona 8-(3-5-0)--0.37500
1. Iowa St. 8-(2-6-0)--0.25000
1. California 8-(1-7-0)--0.12500
1. Missouri 8-(1-7-0)--0.12500
6. Kansas St. 7-(6-1-0)--0.85714
6. Stanford 7-(5-2-0)--0.71429
6. Oklahoma 7-(5-2-0)--0.71429
6. Oregon St. 7-(4-3-0)--0.57143
6. Oklahoma St. 7-(3-4-0)--0.42857
6. West Virginia 7-(2-5-0)--0.28571
6. Texas Tech 7-(2-5-0)--0.28571
6. Tennessee 7-(1-6-0)--0.14286
6. Mississippi 7-(1-6-0)--0.14286
6. Colorado 7-(0-7-0)--0.00000
6. Kansas 7-(0-7-0)--0.00000
6. Auburn 7-(0-7-0)--0.00000for most wins, i know oklahoma should be in the 2nd tier with 5 (tt, texas, baylor, wvu, ok st)
not taking time out to look rest up, and this doesn't really change what he's trying to imply. but it's just a pet peeve of mine to post incomplete info.
NcaaAssassinG13
- 4 stars Rating: 75
2280 votes total - Letterman
- (2385)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13 said...
No, not wrong. It's obvious from the list in my OP that only teams over .500 are listed. No need to list 5-7 and below teams there.
In the 2nd post is the complete list of teams and an explanation about the Big 12 since they still have a game to play. I counted WVU figuring they will probably beat Kansas, but didnt count Baylor just because there a 50/50 game vs Ok St.
Looks like reading comprehension isnt your strong point. Anybody with a 2nd grade reading level could have figured that out.
Sorry, but my pet peeve is people like you whose M.O. is to accuse others of being wrong when you yourself don't have the first clue. Once- ok whatever, but you've done it 2-3 times now.
Real Chump move on your part home slice.
This post was edited by theharbinater on 11/29/2012 at 5:29 PM
theharbinater
- 5 stars Rating: 92
844 votes total - Varsity
- (1560)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
theharbinater said...
first, it's not obvious in you op that you only listed .500 or better teams. maybe if you had stated so it would be obvious, or at least given their overall record.
2nd, i've had 2-3 times now where i've had to decipher what it is you're trying to post as facts. perhaps if you'd simply post your parameters we would have this problem, instead of expecting people to reconstruct your data and understand where you came up with it.
the one other time i remember it, i corrected my self anyway in a following post.
finally, it does, in fact, contain errors.
oklahoma should be in the 5 wins in the "most wins" category
ksu, oklahoma, wvu and tt all should be in the 7 wins column in most games category
nd, oregon, ou, ksu, uf, and tcu all have 3 road wins, unless you mean true away games, and it's just the 3 you mentioned plus tcu (appears you meant true road games here, just left off tcu)
usc has 5, and ksu, tcu, uf, stanford, south car, ore st, baylor, mich, and tt all have 4 road games (away and neutral), unless you meant true road games which has ksu, tcu, oregon st, south car, stanford, and usc all with 4. (appears you used away and neutral here, which is why it's so damn hard to figure out what your data set paramenters are by guessing)
i stopped here as i'm running into errors with each category.
only other thing i can think is you're also using those with winning records vs that opposition, but that can't be true or you wouldn't list usc with 5 road games as they are 2-3 in all games away/neutral.
at least give a brief explanation where your info comes from so people can test against it, instead of hiding behind "obvious".
NcaaAssassinG13
- 4 stars Rating: 75
2280 votes total - Letterman
- (2385)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13
- 4 stars Rating: 75
2280 votes total - Letterman
- (2385)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
HADOUKEN
- 5 stars Rating: 83
2224 votes total - Letterman
- (2253)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
sf2k4
- 5 stars Rating: 85
4003 votes total - We Live It National Champs 15
- All Conference
- (10213)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13
- 4 stars Rating: 75
2280 votes total - Letterman
- (2385)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13
- 4 stars Rating: 75
2280 votes total - Letterman
- (2385)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
Ohio Tider
- 4 stars Rating: 62
135 votes total - Freshman
- (167)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
Ohio Tider said...
Another clown with stats. The PAC 12 would get murdered against the SEC, and the OP knows it. Or he's just stupid. You could take out Bama and Kentucky and the SEC would win head to head. Hell Auburn could beat Colorado.
Wow, you are really going out on a limb there with Auburn over Colorado.
Heck, I think my old high school team could be Colorado this year.BTW, you are another tard who thinks Won / Loss records are stats.
Winner says - Hey good game, we won but you guys really battled hard.
Loser says - "Well, you might have won the game but that's just a crazy clown stat."
NcaaAssassinG13
- 4 stars Rating: 75
2280 votes total - Letterman
- (2385)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
Records vs over .500 AQ teams only (Season Recap)