Online Now 3846

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2322
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3978
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

SIAP: USC Walk-on loses scholly to criminal

  • Just to reiterate Zo

    "USC Walk-On loses scholly to criminal" was the thread title.

    Dumbass much?

    signature image signature image signature image

    mriderblue12

  • mriderblue12 said...

    Just to reiterate Zo

    "USC Walk-On loses scholly to criminal" was the thread title.

    Dumbass much?

    Just to reiterate.

    Both players were on scholarship last year, so how did he take the walk-on scholarship's spot this year??? Didn't said player simply retain his scholarship and you're just trying to fit your opinion devoid of the facts. I mean, he never left, just was suspended from the team for 6 months and did everything asked/required of him to rejoin the team. By the way, we're talking about a third string Linebacker who recorded a total of 6 tackles last year by being on Special Teams. Not exactly someone vital to the program, but not kicked to the curb either by Kiffin for making a mistake. Something I've no doubt you would probably criticize Kiffin for had he chosen that route instead.

    Wouldn't a new scholarship player have to have taken his ship??? Another walk-on who was awarded a scholarship for the first time this year , so if anything and you're able to be honest you can say he gave a walk-on's scholarship to another deserving walk-on player. While we're at it and you're taking the high moral ground here, how many walk-on's exactly were awarded scholarships on your team??? Should we start a thread asking why your is your coach too big of an asshole to do such a thing?

    Yeah, it appears you Dumbass quite much.

    This post was edited by PabloF on 9/13/2012 at 2:37 PM

    signature image signature image

    PabloF

  • mriderblue12 said...

    Hypocritical?

    Last I checked no one lost their scholarship for Clark to come back. Last I checked, that's what the post was about.

    Didn't know you couldn't read, or were just a dumbass.

    That scholarship could have been pulled when he plead guilty to a felony and used on a walk-on. So yes in effect a walk-on who would have been on scholarship did not get on, so a felon on your team would get one. Scholarships are 1 year agreement's, not 4 or 5.

    Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken

    MJRuffalo

  • mriderblue12 said...

    Just to reiterate Zo

    "USC Walk-On loses scholly to criminal" was the thread title.

    Dumbass much?

    Lmao nice try. If Clark gets booted who gets the scholarship? Ty Isaac?

    Alonzo Harris

  • Alonzo Harris said...

    Lmao nice try. If Clark gets booted who gets the scholarship? Ty Isaac?

    A hypothetical. Michigan already handed out their scholarships to walk-ons. And guess what none of theirs got revoked for Frank Clark.

    signature image signature image signature image

    mriderblue12

  • mriderblue12 said...

    A hypothetical. Michigan already handed out their scholarships to walk-ons. And guess what none of theirs got revoked for Frank Clark.

    No, Michigan just kept the felon on scholarship the entire time.

    Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken

    MJRuffalo

  • Some threads really need to die much quicker, IMO.

    BetterOff

  • mriderblue12 said...

    A hypothetical. Michigan already handed out their scholarships to walk-ons. And guess what none of theirs got revoked for Frank Clark.

    One would have gotten one if Clark got booted like you holier than thou boys are asking Kiffin to do.

    That happened on July 24th, plenty of time to free up the scholarship to a walk on if you like to think of michigan as being so draconianly pius.

    Simi's scholarship was guaranteed anytime he fulfilled his requirements. Doesn't mean that's the one that took up Will Andrew's.

    This post was edited by Alonzo Harris on 9/13/2012 at 8:57 PM

    Alonzo Harris