Online Now 4633

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2219
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 4156
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Schools ranked by total wins since 2000.

  • RTR13 said...

    Congrats. I'll take what is going on currently...the present seems a little more relevant, no?

    So, in the last 4 years we are 47-6 with 2 national titles, 1 SEC title, 3-1 against Auburn with 2 blowouts, 4-0 against Tennessee with 3 blowouts, 3 BCS games and a 49-7 slaughtering of Co-Big 10 Champ Michigan State in our only non-BCS bowl.

    Yes, I think that timeline works quite well. Congrats on what y'all did back in 2002 or whatever though.

    yea, isn't that what they always say to us when we "used" to bring up how dominate the 60's, 70's and some of the 80's were with the Bear? "what about now".

    LOL - 2000 to now, i'll take 49th and exactly where we are today. lovin' it.

    nice breakdown btw.

    viper_36

  • *brushes dirt off shoulders*

    signature image

    Follow Me on Twitter @landthieves landthieves.com

    LandThieves

  • 23-6 vs the top 30 smoke

    Alonzo Harris

  • I' like to see the last 4 year numbers. Or 3. Or 2. Or 1. Ya know....."present".

    signature image
    signature image
     signature image

    DrStach_

  • kitemac said...

    You guys have 2 titles this millennium. That's why I don't understand why so many Bama fans are being butthurt about the timeline.

    I'm not upset about the timeline. It's not like we don't know we sucked ass for most of the 2000's. I'm just saying it isn't relevant anymore.

    I think it's pretty amazing when you consider Saban has won more games in the past 4 years (48) than Bama did the 7 years before he arrived (46)...and that includes two 10 win seasons.

    HADOUKEN

  • MrWoodson said...

    Stop your cryin'. At least you didn't hire Rich Rod.

    Good point!

    lbclark1 ●

  • Here is the same list over the last 4 years. Much more relevant I think.

    I-A Wins 2008-2011

    http://football.stassen.com/cgi-bin/records/calc-wp.pl?start=2008&end=2011&rpct=30&min=5&se=on&by=Wins

    football.stassen.com

    Barbich

  • Goodness the "cheers" symbol means I'm just messing with you guys.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Danielle Hunter, Jamario Rasco, Anthony FREAK Johnson.. DL wrecking crew of 2013.

    Lesticals ●

  • Barbich said...

    Here is the same list over the last 4 years. Much more relevant I think.

    We all know Boise State doesn't count so we're #1. Thanks for clearing that up for everyone.

    HADOUKEN

  • Under Review said...

    I was scratching my head why USC was so low and I figured out they erased half of 2004 and all of 2005 which were all wins.

    Feh.

    Feh, the first cousin of Meh.

    buttesnake ●

  • Barbich said...

    Here is the same list over the last 4 years. Much more relevant I think.

    yay FSU and NIU still tied.... this year is a telling year in terms of the battle between the Seminoles and Huskies!

    twitter: nszullo

    DCHokie88

  • kitemac said...

    Princeton and Yale are the best football teams of all time or do their titles not matter because they were the only two teams playing?

    Princeton and Yale are not in the conversation for best of all time because their greatness is defined by one era. To be one of the greatest of all time you have to maintained an elite level for an extended period of time. That is why Michigan's accomplishments are lessened in my mind because so many of them occurred prior to the AP era. I do still consider them elite though do to an abundance of very good years (10 win seasons/conference championships), although their truly elite teams (national champions) have been limited.

    bamadvm

  • bamadvm said...

    Princeton and Yale are not in the conversation for best of all time because their greatness is defined by one era. To be one of the greatest of all time you have to maintained an elite level for an extended period of time. That is why Michigan's accomplishments are lessened in my mind because so many of them occurred prior to the AP era. I do still consider them elite though do to an abundance of very good years (10 win seasons/conference championships), although their truly elite teams (national champions) have been limited.

    It's pretty crazy that they have only 1 national title the past like 64 years. Same for Texas who has 1 the past 41 years or so. They are regarded as two of the best programs of all time and the conference titles and wins are way up there but national championships, not so much lately.

    Before the "well they don't make up championships like Bama", we have 9 AP/Coaches/BCS titles since 1961.

    HADOUKEN

  • bamadvm said...

    Princeton and Yale are not in the conversation for best of all time because their greatness is defined by one era. To be one of the greatest of all time you have to maintained an elite level for an extended period of time. That is why Michigan's accomplishments are lessened in my mind because so many of them occurred prior to the AP era. I do still consider them elite though do to an abundance of very good years (10 win seasons/conference championships), although their truly elite teams (national champions) have been limited.

    So we are talking about they dominated a timeline? I thought we weren't going to do that.

    signature image signature image signature image

    kitemac ●

  • kitemac said...

    So we are talking about they dominated a timeline? I thought we weren't going to do that.

    You brought them up. That's why we're talking about them. The fact is Princeton and Yale haven't been relevant for like 100 years. They racked up titles when it was basically the two of them playing each other with almost zero other teams. It's apples and oranges when comparing their titles to those of Alabama.

    The point is, Alabama is the best program in the history of the world, has the most national titles in the modern era, and is the best program in the world today. We're #1, stop trying to prove we're not, you can't do it, and everybody hates you.

    HADOUKEN

  • RTR13 said...

    You brought them up. That's why we're talking about them. The fact is Princeton and Yale haven't been relevant for like 100 years. They racked up titles when it was basically the two of them playing each other with almost zero other teams. It's apples and oranges when comparing their titles to those of Alabama.

    The point is, Alabama is the best program in the history of the world, has the most national titles in the modern era, and is the best program in the world today. We're #1, stop trying to prove we're not, you can't do it, and everybody hates you.

    It's the Auburn way.

    cordellgiles

  • RTR13 said...

    You brought them up. That's why we're talking about them. The fact is Princeton and Yale haven't been relevant for like 100 years. They racked up titles when it was basically the two of them playing each other with almost zero other teams. It's apples and oranges when comparing their titles to those of Alabama.

    The point is, Alabama is the best program in the history of the world, has the most national titles in the modern era, and is the best program in the world today. We're #1, stop trying to prove we're not, you can't do it, and everybody hates you.

    Haha have you followed this thread? No one said anything about the OP's list until a Bama fan started to complain about a "Haha. The newest arbitrary timeline." Go back to page one and start reading again.

    signature image signature image signature image

    kitemac ●

  • RTR13 said...

    It's pretty crazy that they have only 1 national title the past like 64 years. Same for Texas who has 1 the past 41 years or so. They are regarded as two of the best programs of all time and the conference titles and wins are way up there but national championships, not so much lately.

    Before the "well they don't make up championships like Bama", we have 9 AP/Coaches/BCS titles since 1961.

    Moved.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by MrWoodson on 5/22/2012 at 3:10 PM

    MrWoodson

  • kitemac said...

    Haha have you followed this thread? No one said anything about the OP's list until a Bama fan started to complain about a "Haha. The newest arbitrary timeline." Go back to page one and start reading again.

    Yes, I've followed the thread. Why do you think the OP posted the list with the comment he made? He's an Auburn fan trying to show that Auburn has more wins than Alabama since 2000. That's the entire point of this thread and you know it. So...we Bama fans simply pointed out that we're better now and are better overall which is what really matters as opposed to some timeline that he picks and chooses at will. Yes, 2000 was the beginning of the new millennium but it also just so happened to begin possibly the worst era of Alabama Football ever.

    Like I said, all of history and the present are the only things that matter but for whatever reason Auburn fans love to use "since Bear died" and other timelines to prove their worth. This is simply another attempt at that. That's fine, we know we were awful most of last decade. We're just saying we've been past that for a few years now so stop trying to relive the "fear the thumb" days and sh*t....they're over...stop milking them.

    HADOUKEN

  • bamadvm said...

    Princeton and Yale are not in the conversation for best of all time because their greatness is defined by one era. To be one of the greatest of all time you have to maintained an elite level for an extended period of time. That is why Michigan's accomplishments are lessened in my mind because so many of them occurred prior to the AP era. I do still consider them elite though do to an abundance of very good years (10 win seasons/conference championships), although their truly elite teams (national champions) have been limited.

    We can't help it that the rest of you sucked for so long. I laugh at people who think UF, which didn't win its first title until the 1990s, and Oregon, which has yet to do so, deserve greater respect. And for all of Bama's success under Coach Saban, you were pretty pathetic for most of the decade prior to that. Michigan has played Bama three times, all in the past 20 years, and we are 2-1 in those games. And those wins have nothing to do with our success in the early 1900s. The fact is that all programs go through cycles and, except for about 20 years after WWII and the three-year debacle that was the RR era, we have been nationally relevant in CFB for more than 130 years. That absolutely dwarfs all but a few programs.

    But you are right that Michigan was overwhelmingly dominant in the early days of CFB and, in fact, is one of a handful of teams that invented the game and/or were responsible for its evolution into what we see on the field today. We make no apologies for that. We are, in fact, proud of it. We are also proud that, unlike most of the other elite programs from that era, we are the only one that remains consistently relevant today.

    It's hard to do something well for 133 years. And every great CFB program has had a few down years here and there. But based on any measure - national championships, major conference championships, wins, win %, All Americans, Heismans and other major awards, coaches/players in the HOF, players drafted by the NFL, etc - Michigan is at or near the top in every category. Very, very, very few programs can say the same thing.

    This post was edited by MrWoodson on 5/22/2012 at 3:25 PM

    MrWoodson

  • MrWoodson said...

    We can't help it that the rest of you sucked for so long. I laugh at people who think UF, which didn't win its first title until the 1990s, and Oregon, which has yet to do so, deserve greater respect. And for all of Bama's success under Coach Saban, you were pretty pathetic for most of the decade prior to that. Michigan has played Bama three times, all in the past 20 years, and we are 2-1 in those games. And those wins have nothing to do eith our success in the early 1900s. The fact is that all programs go through cycles and, except for about 20 years after WWII and the three-year debacle that was the RR era, we have been nationally relevant in CFB for more than 130 years. That absolutely dwarfs all but a few programs.

    But you are right that Michigan was overwhelmingly dominant in the early days of CFB and, in fact, is one of a handful of teams that invented the game and/or were responsible for its evolution into what we see on the field today. We make no apologies for that. We are, in fact, proud of it. We are also proud that, unlike most of the other elite programs from that era, we are the only one that remains consistently relevant today.

    It's hard to do something well for 133 years. And every great CFB program has had a few down years here and there. But based on any measure - national championships, major conference championships, wins, win %, All Americans, Heismans and other major awards, coaches/players in the HOF, players drafted by the NFL, etc - Michigan is at or near the top in every category. Very, very, very few programs can say the same thing.

    Yeah...I actually agree with everything you just said. I just think it's incredible that Michigan has only 1 national title the past 64 years considering how good Michigan has been. That's very surprising is all I'm saying.

    HADOUKEN

  • kitemac said...

    So we are talking about they dominated a timeline? I thought we weren't going to do that.

    I'm not sure how you misunderstood my post. I'm not looking at a timeline. I'm looking at the entire history of college football. Prineton and Yale haven't accomplished anything in approximately the last 70 years. Then you compare that to a team like Alabama that has won a NC in 8 of the last 10 years.

    bamadvm

  • RTR13 said...

    Yes, I've followed the thread. Why do you think the OP posted the list with the comment he made? He's an Auburn fan trying to show that Auburn has more wins than Alabama since 2000. That's the entire point of this thread and you know it. So...we Bama fans simply pointed out that we're better now and are better overall which is what really matters as opposed to some timeline that he picks and chooses at will. Yes, 2000 was the beginning of the new millennium but it also just so happened to begin possibly the worst era of Alabama Football ever.

    Like I said, all of history and the present are the only things that matter but for whatever reason Auburn fans love to use "since Bear died" and other timelines to prove their worth. This is simply another attempt at that. That's fine, we know we were awful most of last decade. We're just saying we've been past that for a few years now so stop trying to relive the "fear the thumb" days and sh*t....they're over...stop milking them.

    Then if we are going to do all of history than Princton and Yale have more titles than Bama. That was my point if we want to take ALL of history.

    This post was edited by kitemac on 5/22/2012 at 3:13 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    kitemac ●

  • kitemac said...

    Then if we are going to do all of history than Princton and Yale have more titles than Bama. That was my point if we want to take ALL of history.

    I'm a Princeton grad and fan first, so nobody has bragging rights over me. AU is my second team.

    signature image signature image signature image

    TURDS ALL UP IN THIS MUG. /// "2010 Auburn Tigers, my favorite team. Unbeaten in all ways." -- Dan Wetzel, April 4, 2013, 6:29 p.m.

    Mr Perfect

  • kitemac said...

    Then if we are going to do all of history than Princton and Yale have more titles than Bama. That was my point if we want to take ALL of history.

    Well, that depends. If you want to acknowledge their old, pre-modern era titles...then you must acknowledge ours. If you will acknowledge our 14 titles then I will concede the point.

    I've trapped you.

    HADOUKEN

Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Features
Resources
Connect

247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports