The Blue Board

Is that not a fair question? Seriously? Is it unconstitutional?

Yes. You have to be drug tested for jobs(at least any job I've ever had) so why not?

We will. Taxpayers. I think when 35-50% test positive it could actually save us money.

Have you been doing your own, private drug tests to reach that 35-50% number?

Why would I? The ACLU already denounced it. I'm just guessing. I would gladly pay a 30 dollars extra every week to fund 52 tests a year for the poor. But I'm a giver. Or the government. Could just cut a national guard troop here or there and fund it. Wouldn't cost the poor anything.

Which leads me into my next discussion points. Governement paid abortions up to 5 years old. That way, no kids would suffer long term.

2.6%<<<<<<<<<<<30-35%

30*52<<<<<<<<<<<<<$42k

Nm

"While early results hint at some potential, savings have been small and few abusers have been caught. More troubling, collateral damage to children has not been effectively addressed — strange, considering that today's welfare program, which offers temporary assistance, is open only to deeply impoverished families with children."

Savings.....small or big......always a good thing

Hi fsufsu!

Show me the guy who can turn a loaf of bread into a catfish pond and I'll concede.

Once someone loses their money source, they must find a new way to make a living. People living off of Welfare aren't trained workers that can easily go out and find a well paying job. I'm sure a lot of people would turn to either selling drugs or prostitution. Those are two illegal professions in which you can make more money than working two part time jobs. Ultimately, it'll probably end with more people in our prisons and a larger bill to the tax payers.