-
NcaaAssassinG13 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 75
2285 votes total - Letterman
- (2389)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
sf2k4
- 5 stars Rating: 85
4004 votes total - We Live It National Champs 15
- All Conference
- (10216)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
Landohusker
- 4 stars Rating: 66
2069 votes total - Redshirt
- (3553)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
LScootU
- 4 stars Rating: 67
11186 votes total - Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.
- Heisman
- (31215)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
Landohusker
- 4 stars Rating: 66
2069 votes total - Redshirt
- (3553)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
Macdaddy7930
- 4 stars Rating: 78
5617 votes total - Starter
- (7740)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
Macdaddy7930
- 4 stars Rating: 78
5617 votes total - Starter
- (7740)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13 said...
I would have said dropped from #1 to #4 like Alabama did after losing to A&M, but since there is only 1 undefeated team left instead of 3, Oregon should go to the front of the 1 loss line just like Bama did, to #2 right?
Of course, I know that won't happen because college football is the new WWF, fake and scripted like wrestling ever since it was implemented by the SEC in 1998.
But let's see here - #1 Oregon loses at home - #1 Alabama loses at home (Both teams lost at home) Oregon loses by 3 pts in OT - Alabama loses by 5 pts (Oregon closer loss and in OT) Oregon loses to #13 Stanford - Alabama loses to #15 A&M (Oregon played the higher ranked team)
Alabama dropped from #1 to #4, and right to the front of the line of the 1 loss teams. The answer should be #2, right at the front of the line of 1 loss teams like Alabama was put last week.
The usual excuses that are sometimes valid but rarely hold true that are used to try and explain away this rigged system like; it depends on who they lost to, and by how much, and where, and how late in the season, and the infamous brown-Eye ball test, can't even be applied here.
So, let's see who comes up with the best new reason why Oregon not getting the same rankings treatment as Alabummer did last week; despite also losing at home, by a slimmer margin (2pts less in OT), and against a higher ranked team, is not the result of biased polls and a rigged system.
"Oh and Mac...the horse's name is Friday." - Jim Bowers
ksredmill
- 5 stars Rating: 85
8453 votes total - Director of Gump Operations
- Starter
- (7383)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13 said...
I would have said dropped from #1 to #4 like Alabama did after losing to A&M, but since there is only 1 undefeated team left instead of 3, Oregon should go to the front of the 1 loss line just like Bama did, to #2 right?
Of course, I know that won't happen because college football is the new WWF, fake and scripted like wrestling ever since it was implemented by the SEC in 1998.
But let's see here - #1 Oregon loses at home - #1 Alabama loses at home (Both teams lost at home) Oregon loses by 3 pts in OT - Alabama loses by 5 pts (Oregon closer loss and in OT) Oregon loses to #13 Stanford - Alabama loses to #15 A&M (Oregon played the higher ranked team)
Alabama dropped from #1 to #4, and right to the front of the line of the 1 loss teams. The answer should be #2, right at the front of the line of 1 loss teams like Alabama was put last week.
The usual excuses that are sometimes valid but rarely hold true that are used to try and explain away this rigged system like; it depends on who they lost to, and by how much, and where, and how late in the season, and the infamous brown-Eye ball test, can't even be applied here.
So, let's see who comes up with the best new reason why Oregon not getting the same rankings treatment as Alabummer did last week; despite also losing at home, by a slimmer margin (2pts less in OT), and against a higher ranked team, is not the result of biased polls and a rigged system.
10 Major Poll National Titles (CFB record) 35 Bowl Wins (CFB record) 61 Wins over last 5 years (CFB record)
coolstorybro
- 4 stars Rating: 76
1097 votes total - Varsity
- (1489)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
BamaLivesFootba ●
- 4 stars Rating: 68
6698 votes total - The Incorruptibles
- Heisman
- (20728)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13 said...
I would have said dropped from #1 to #4 like Alabama did after losing to A&M, but since there is only 1 undefeated team left instead of 3, Oregon should go to the front of the 1 loss line just like Bama did, to #2 right?
Of course, I know that won't happen because college football is the new WWF, fake and scripted like wrestling ever since it was implemented by the SEC in 1998.
But let's see here - #1 Oregon loses at home - #1 Alabama loses at home (Both teams lost at home) Oregon loses by 3 pts in OT - Alabama loses by 5 pts (Oregon closer loss and in OT) Oregon loses to #13 Stanford - Alabama loses to #15 A&M (Oregon played the higher ranked team)
Alabama dropped from #1 to #4, and right to the front of the line of the 1 loss teams. The answer should be #2, right at the front of the line of 1 loss teams like Alabama was put last week.
The usual excuses that are sometimes valid but rarely hold true that are used to try and explain away this rigged system like; it depends on who they lost to, and by how much, and where, and how late in the season, and the infamous brown-Eye ball test, can't even be applied here.
So, let's see who comes up with the best new reason why Oregon not getting the same rankings treatment as Alabummer did last week; despite also losing at home, by a slimmer margin (2pts less in OT), and against a higher ranked team, is not the result of biased polls and a rigged system.
Who cares?? Guess all those Ducks on your board were right they'd kill us.. Oregon still gets smacked by physical teams, guess what ND's a physical team..Float On
This post was edited by star69 on 11/18/2012 at 12:10 AM
star69
- 4 stars Rating: 65
5382 votes total - Heisman
- (22625)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
highsnap
- 5 stars Rating: 87
932 votes total - Varsity
- (1114)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 75
2285 votes total - Letterman
- (2389)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
ducklefty ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
2330 votes total - Redshirt
- (3661)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13 said...
I'm actually glad that this will happen, because it will be one of the best examples of the joke
college football has become thanks to the BcS and how ridiculous the southern polls are.Lose by less to a higher ranked opponent than Bama did, and let's so how many 1 loss teams
Oregon will be behind.It's actually kind of amusing right now but only because I'm not a Quack fan.
Macdaddy7930
- 4 stars Rating: 78
5617 votes total - Starter
- (7740)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
LScootU
- 4 stars Rating: 67
11186 votes total - Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.
- Heisman
- (31215)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13 said...
I would have said dropped from #1 to #4 like Alabama did after losing to A&M, but since there
is only 1 undefeated team left instead of 3, Oregon should go to the front of the 1 loss line just
like Bama did, to #2 right?Of course, I know that won't happen because college football is the new WWF, fake and scripted
like wrestling ever since it was implemented by the SEC in 1998.But let's see here -
#1 Oregon loses at home - #1 Alabama loses at home (Both teams lost at home)
Oregon loses by 3 pts in OT - Alabama loses by 5 pts (Oregon closer loss and in OT)
Oregon loses to #13 Stanford - Alabama loses to #15 A&M (Oregon played the higher ranked team)Alabama dropped from #1 to #4, and right to the front of the line of the 1 loss teams.
The answer should be #2, right at the front of the line of 1 loss teams
like Alabama was put last week.The usual excuses that are sometimes valid but rarely hold true that are used to try and explain
away this rigged system like; it depends on who they lost to, and by how much, and where,
and how late in the season, and the infamous brown-Eye ball test, can't even be applied here.So, let's see who comes up with the best new reason why Oregon not getting the same rankings
treatment as Alabummer did last week; despite also losing at home, by a slimmer margin (2pts less in OT),
and against a higher ranked team, is not the result of biased polls and a rigged system. Simply the best
CrimsonD247
- 5 stars Rating: 84
2326 votes total - Back-up
- (4792)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13 said...
I'm actually glad that this will happen, because it will be one of the best examples of the joke college football has become thanks to the BcS and how ridiculous the southern polls are.
Lose by less to a higher ranked opponent than Bama did, and let's so how many 1 loss teams Oregon will be behind.
It's actually kind of amusing right now but only because I'm not a Quack fan.
This post was edited by coolstorybro on 11/18/2012 at 12:21 AM
10 Major Poll National Titles (CFB record) 35 Bowl Wins (CFB record) 61 Wins over last 5 years (CFB record)
coolstorybro
- 4 stars Rating: 76
1097 votes total - Varsity
- (1489)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 75
2285 votes total - Letterman
- (2389)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13 said...
Hey look, the guy who disappeared after Alabama lost, is back.
Damn I thought you were either still crying in mamma's basement or had ran away.At least the rest of the Bama brethren sacked up when they lost and took their medicine,
but you where ghost.Now you want to talk some shit with your giant pair of lips, aaaahhhaaaaaa
what a pussy you are Macdaddy7930
- 4 stars Rating: 78
5617 votes total - Starter
- (7740)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 75
2285 votes total - Letterman
- (2389)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13 said...
Hey look, the guy who disappeared after Alabama lost, is back. Damn I thought you were either still crying in mamma's basement or had ran away.
At least the rest of the Bama brethren sacked up when they lost and took their medicine, but you where ghost.
Now you want to talk some shit with your giant pair of lips, aaaahhhaaaaaa what a pussy you are
RATT
- 5 stars Rating: 83
1939 votes total - King of the Alcoholics
- All Conference
- (10065)
- 26 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
NcaaAssassinG13 ●
- 4 stars Rating: 75
2285 votes total - Letterman
- (2389)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
Macdaddy7930
- 4 stars Rating: 78
5617 votes total - Starter
- (7740)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
-
sf2k4
- 5 stars Rating: 85
4004 votes total - We Live It National Champs 15
- All Conference
- (10216)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
Yes they do
So Oregon drops just like Bama right? Except only to #2