-
BamaLivesFootba ●
- 4 stars Rating: 68
6614 votes total - The Incorruptibles
- Heisman
- (20367)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Status said...
I dont want to see him fail. He's doing a perfectly fine job of doing that on his own. What I enjoy is watching all these dumbasses who thought obama was going to take care of them and stick it to those evil rich people.
Meanwhile my taxes went up and Im in the middle class tax bracket

BamaLivesFootba ●
- 4 stars Rating: 68
6614 votes total - The Incorruptibles
- Heisman
- (20367)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Status ●
- 3 stars Rating: 60
3990 votes total - Starter
- (6730)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
BamaLivesFootba ●
- 4 stars Rating: 68
6614 votes total - The Incorruptibles
- Heisman
- (20367)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
mac1992 said...
As someone who voted for Obama, I certainly don't think he "can do no wrong." It's actually kind of funny that the scenario in Congress that CMXI was just explaining is kind of being played out in this thread. Regardless of what he said and what actual facts he used, you guys just point out one arbitrary act the president has done to knock him down a peg and then refer to him as, "a Marxist communist" and "the worst president of all time." Those are ridiculous statements.
IMO it roots from democrats who wanted more than anything for Obama to be the White Knight, which he hasnt really been. Republicans obviously didn't see him as being that figure and now would do anything to see him fail. But when comparing just the last 2 presidencies alone, how could you honestly think Obama is the worst president of all time? I'm not calling it racism, but Republicans desperately want to see this guy fail. I don't even think desperate is a strong enough word for it. It's like the Lebron effect.
Amazinglyblue78
- 5 stars Rating: 86
374 votes total - Varsity
- (1189)
- 14 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Amazinglyblue78
- 5 stars Rating: 86
374 votes total - Varsity
- (1189)
- 14 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BamaLivesFootba said...
ROFL @ you dumb shits still grasping onto Solyndra. Solyndra failed because of market forces not because of the industry itself. It couldn't keep up with the falling prices. It's costs were too high.
Solar panel production is not the same as solar panel installation as well. The capacity and production of electricity from solar and wind has DOUBLED since 2008 and is on pace to keep a similar rate for the near future.
If you think giving one bad loan negates all the positives from the money set aside for alternatives in the ARA, you a fucking retard.
Also, basing a complete 180 degree change of vehicle fueling on a commodity that is on a down-swing due to a temporary glut in supply is retarded. There is a reason that car companies are producing more hybrid,electric and hydrogen powered cars. If natural gas was a no-brainer, they would have already done it.
Battery technology, grid and "fueling" infrastructure, grid capacity from alternatives etc. have all grown leaps in bounds in a very short-term period. All thanks to ARA.
justinboze ●
- 4 stars Rating: 78
790 votes total - Jr. Varsity
- (775)
- 13 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
El Guapo ●
- 5 stars Rating: 81
3333 votes total - Back-up
- (4564)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Status ●
- 3 stars Rating: 60
3990 votes total - Starter
- (6730)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
justinboze said...
ROFL at you. Solyndra was going to fail anyway because of "market forces" and it was obvious to even them. However, they were given millions of dollars with no new business model that would have kept them afloat. Then they went under almost exactly when their own forecasts predicted. Does that seem like a wise use of millions of tax payer dollars to you? That's a rhetorical question.
BamaLivesFootba ●
- 4 stars Rating: 68
6614 votes total - The Incorruptibles
- Heisman
- (20367)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
BamaLivesFootba ●
- 4 stars Rating: 68
6614 votes total - The Incorruptibles
- Heisman
- (20367)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
mac1992
- 5 stars Rating: 82
730 votes total - Varsity
- (1456)
- 16 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BamaLivesFootba said...
ROFL @ you dumb shits still grasping onto Solyndra. Solyndra failed because of market forces not because of the industry itself. It couldn't keep up with the falling prices. It's costs were too high.
Solar panel production is not the same as solar panel installation as well. The capacity and production of electricity from solar and wind has DOUBLED since 2008 and is on pace to keep a similar rate for the near future.
If you think giving one bad loan negates all the positives from the money set aside for alternatives in the ARA, you a fucking retard.
Also, basing a complete 180 degree change of vehicle fueling on a commodity that is on a down-swing due to a temporary glut in supply is retarded. There is a reason that car companies are producing more hybrid,electric and hydrogen powered cars. If natural gas was a no-brainer, they would have already done it.
Battery technology, grid and "fueling" infrastructure, grid capacity from alternatives etc. have all grown leaps in bounds in a very short-term period. All thanks to ARA.
This post was edited by Amazinglyblue78 on 2/21/2013 at 9:04 AM
Amazinglyblue78
- 5 stars Rating: 86
374 votes total - Varsity
- (1189)
- 14 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BamaLivesFootba said...
ROFL @ you dumb shits still grasping onto Solyndra. Solyndra failed because of market forces not because of the industry itself. It couldn't keep up with the falling prices. It's costs were too high.
Solar panel production is not the same as solar panel installation as well. The capacity and production of electricity from solar and wind has DOUBLED since 2008 and is on pace to keep a similar rate for the near future.
If you think giving one bad loan negates all the positives from the money set aside for alternatives in the ARA, you a fucking retard.
Also, basing a complete 180 degree change of vehicle fueling on a commodity that is on a down-swing due to a temporary glut in supply is retarded. There is a reason that car companies are producing more hybrid,electric and hydrogen powered cars. If natural gas was a no-brainer, they would have already done it.
Battery technology, grid and "fueling" infrastructure, grid capacity from alternatives etc. have all grown leaps in bounds in a very short-term period. All thanks to ARA.
This post was edited by TideJoe on 2/21/2013 at 9:05 AM
TideJoe
- 5 stars Rating: 87
747 votes total - Varsity
- (1065)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Amazinglyblue78
- 5 stars Rating: 86
374 votes total - Varsity
- (1189)
- 14 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Amazinglyblue78 said...
ROFL. How much federal money has gone into the natural gas infrastructure? I will help you out 0. These are business men they will read the environment take into account the STUPID administration we have and make decisions based mainly on the patterns shown by the government to license and permit industry across the nation.
Natural gas has been cut off at every turn by this administration. If your a businessman, which clearly your not would you invest in changing over vehicles to natural gas.
No you would invest in a company obviously on the verge of bankruptcy
Grab a clue!.
BamaLivesFootba ●
- 4 stars Rating: 68
6614 votes total - The Incorruptibles
- Heisman
- (20367)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
TideJoe said...
I really don't care where my energy comes from, I'm not making any money from the production/sale of any energy source. I just don't want to be forced in the future to pay a lot more to use an alternative (wind, solar, battery, bio) when there are cheaper forms of energy that our government has demonized (oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear).
BamaLivesFootba ●
- 4 stars Rating: 68
6614 votes total - The Incorruptibles
- Heisman
- (20367)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
BamaLivesFootba said...
A company that dealt with solar panel production equals companies that deal with EV charging infrastructure? Lol.
No I wouldn't invest in natural gas. It's historically low price is not going to last as long as people think and to completely set up an nationwide infrastructure that will costs billions and not recoup a return before the supply glut disappears is retarded.
Amazinglyblue78
- 5 stars Rating: 86
374 votes total - Varsity
- (1189)
- 14 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Amazinglyblue78 said...
You realize that 52 percent of every gallon you pump goes to federal taxes. We have the leverage with natural gas unlike oil that is sparse here at best. You don't even know what your talking about Natural gas is an excellent alternative to get our economy going building revenue to put into other forms coincidentally building many infrastructures.
A company that robbed the people of this country with no repercussions.
BamaLivesFootba ●
- 4 stars Rating: 68
6614 votes total - The Incorruptibles
- Heisman
- (20367)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
BamaLivesFootba said...
No they weren't. The downturn happened after the loan was guaranteed. The loan process was in the works for years and only was sped up because of the ARA. The turn in prices happened around the same time.
Again. This is a very small failure rate compared to all the investments made.
justinboze ●
- 4 stars Rating: 78
790 votes total - Jr. Varsity
- (775)
- 13 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
justinboze said...
Wrong again. They were never in the ball park of competing in the industry. You act as if a downturn caused their failure when they were failing before. Their loan was shot down twice by the Bush Admin and was surprisingly fast tracked once Obama took office.
Also, I didn't recall it being $535 million. That is insane.
BamaLivesFootba ●
- 4 stars Rating: 68
6614 votes total - The Incorruptibles
- Heisman
- (20367)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
justinboze ●
- 4 stars Rating: 78
790 votes total - Jr. Varsity
- (775)
- 13 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
justinboze said...
In the overall scheme of things it is a drop in the bucket. This is a political thread about energy so naturally Solyndra is going to be mentioned.
I am not blowing it out of proportion, but rather debunking your arguments for defending it. Your constant defense of it makes it seem that you have no problem with it but we all know that had Bush done it that you would be all over it. Since Bush shot it down twice and Obama guatanteed it, you are defending it.
BamaLivesFootba ●
- 4 stars Rating: 68
6614 votes total - The Incorruptibles
- Heisman
- (20367)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
BamaLivesFootba said...
God. Give the bush shit a rest.
The company was around for years before it got its loan. It went bankrupt years after getting its loan.
It was a failure in an emerging industry. Pretty common.
A small failure rate in the grand scheme of investments.
It's the politicizing of the loan that irks you. If its proven, I'll eat crow.
Otherwise it's just hot air.
justinboze ●
- 4 stars Rating: 78
790 votes total - Jr. Varsity
- (775)
- 13 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7









So we are extracting more domestic oil than ever but......