Online Now 2364

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1990
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 2392
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

So we haven't had a thread about targeting Americans with drones

  • on U.S. soil... AG Holder didn't rule it out. I undertand he said it was unlikely but that should never happen. Drone attacking Americans on U.S. soil should never be an option.

    signature image signature image signature image

    kitemac ●

  • kitemac said...

    on U.S. soil... AG Holder didn't rule it out. I undertand he said it was unlikely but that should never happen. Drone attacking Americans on U.S. soil should never be an option.

    Amen.

    It doesn't surprise me with this administration

    Jeff4SC

  • I've already given up on earth, one of these days is gonna be really bad and I just hope Im not around for it

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles ●

  • I'm not a Dem or Reb. Just an Independent and decide on what they run on instead of their part affiliation. This is one of the more scarier thoughts IMO. I'm ok with a drone doing surveillance and all that in the U.S. but not strikes on Americans. If a foreign military invades sure use the drones but not on Americans.

    signature image signature image signature image

    kitemac ●

  • NoVaNoles said...

    I've already given up on earth, one of these days is gonna be really bad and I just hope Im not around for it

    Same here man. I'm afraid that day is coming sooner than later

    Jeff4SC

  • Meh. If one of these rednecks with an AR15 starts running around killing kids I have no problem calling in an air strike. Lets be honest, a ton of Americans deserve to be shot with an air strike.

    signature image

    Weedline ●

  • Weedline said...

    Meh. If one of these rednecks with an AR15 starts running around killing kids I have no problem calling in an air strike. Lets be honest, a ton of Americans deserve to be shot with an air strike.

    I take it you have never heard of collateral damage ?

    Or do you just believe smart bombs are as good as the US says they are ? cause they aren't.... fyi

    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles ●

  • Weedline said...

    Meh. If one of these rednecks with an AR15 starts running around killing kids I have no problem calling in an air strike. Lets be honest, a ton of Americans deserve to be shot with an air strike.

    No doubt but if the FBI or one of our law enforcement agencies can't handle it then we have more issues.

    signature image signature image signature image

    kitemac ●

  • Weedline said...

    Meh. If one of these rednecks with an AR15 starts running around killing kids I have no problem calling in an air strike. Lets be honest, a ton of Americans deserve to be shot with an air strike.

    The problem is that is probably not what they would be used for.

    Jeff4SC

  • kitemac said...

    No doubt but if the FBI or one of our law enforcement agencies can't handle it then we have more issues.

    We have a ton of issue. If they had used a drone strike instead of sending in officers to get that cop in California one guy would still be alive today. I would have had zero problem with them blowing up someones property to save a life.

    signature image

    Weedline ●

  • Weedline said...

    We have a ton of issue. If they had used a drone strike instead of sending in officers to get that cop in California one guy would still be alive today. I would have had zero problem with them blowing up someones property to save a life.

    So you are okay with someone's property being damaged that they worked hard for?

    Jeff4SC

  • Weedline said...

    Meh. If one of these rednecks with an AR15 starts running around killing kids I have no problem calling in an air strike. Lets be honest, a ton of Americans deserve to be shot with an air strike.

    Detroit could use a nuclear bomb. Just start over.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Sir Mix A Lot

  • Where are all the libs that were screaming and crying when bush pushed wire taps?

    Even surveillance drones make me uneasy; all of this skepticism is fueled greatly by this administrations lack of addressing the issue.

    signature image signature image signature image

    panic1013

  • Why would they go to drones when snipers have worked just fine for the last 50 years?

    We are both atheists. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours

    OmegaBuckeye

  • Weedline said...

    We have a ton of issue. If they had used a drone strike instead of sending in officers to get that cop in California one guy would still be alive today. I would have had zero problem with them blowing up someones property to save a life.

    What if someone else was in there that we didn't know about? Or what if the bomb missed by a few hundred yards and took out something else. Or what if he dipped out as the law enforcement backed off and took cover and we just wasted a quarter of a million dollar missile. I understand that he was going to fight to the death but what if he decided to throw his gun out the window and surrender just before a missile was dropped. Every American has a right to a trial.

    signature image signature image signature image

    kitemac ●

  • Jeff4SC said...

    So you are okay with someone's property being damaged that they worked hard for?

    To save another life? lol, yeah, I'm ok with that.

    signature image

    Weedline ●

  • Rand Paul reveals letters from DOJ that say President could authorize drone strikes on US soil – Glenn Beck

    http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/03/05/rand-paul-reveals-letters-from-doj-that-say-president-could-authorize-drone-strikes-on-us-soil/

    www.glennbeck.com

    Jeff4SC

  • Weedline said...

    To save another life? lol, yeah, I'm ok with that.

    Seems like the police department involved with the police officer sucked anyway. He was right under their nose the entire time and took them forever to find him.

    Jeff4SC

  • panic1013 said...

    Where are all the libs that were screaming and crying when bush pushed wire taps?

    Even surveillance drones make me uneasy; all of this skepticism is fueled greatly by this administrations lack of addressing the issue.

    This is not even in the same discussion. Surveillance isn't close to actually dropping a bomb on U.S. soil. BTW I was with the libs not liking the wire taps. This is apple to oranges though IMO.

    signature image signature image signature image

    kitemac ●

  • kitemac said...

    What if someone else was in there that we didn't know about? Or what if the bomb missed by a few hundred yards and took out something else. Or what if he dipped out as the law enforcement backed off and took cover and we just wasted a quarter of a million dollar missile. I understand that he was going to fight to the death but what if he decided to throw his gun out the window and surrender just before a missile was dropped. Every American has a right to a trial.

    That's not the argument. We are asking would it be OK to kill someone with a drone if it saved the lives off others. There is no justification to say no IMO. Cost/benefit is another argument.

    signature image

    Weedline ●

  • Jeff4SC said...

    Lulz at Glenn Beck website reference

    SCirish843 ●

  • kitemac said...

    This is not even in the same discussion. Surveillance isn't close to actually dropping a bomb on U.S. soil. BTW I was with the libs not liking the wire taps. This is apple to oranges though IMO.

    It's not apples to oranges.

    I'm against the wire taps too, but the underlying issue of both matters is executive power.

    signature image signature image signature image

    panic1013

  • SCirish843 said...

    Lulz at Glenn Beck website reference

    Lulz all you want. I guess those documents he was showing are fake too right?

    This post was edited by Jeff4SC on 3/6/2013 at 3:55 PM

    Jeff4SC

  • Weedline said...

    That's not the argument. We are asking would it be OK to kill someone with a drone if it saved the lives off others. There is no justification to say no IMO. Cost/benefit is another argument.

    So you would be cool with cruise missiles or anything else weapon wise being used on U.S. soil if it may save other lives. There are always alternatives to everything. I'm not ok with the danger that comes with bombs being dropped on our soil.

    signature image signature image signature image

    kitemac ●

  • kitemac said...

    This is not even in the same discussion. Surveillance isn't close to actually dropping a bomb on U.S. soil. BTW I was with the libs not liking the wire taps. This is apple to oranges though IMO.

    .

    This post was edited by justinboze on 3/7/2013 at 7:44 AM

    justinboze ●

Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Features
Resources
Connect

247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports