Online Now 3460

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1695
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 2515
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

South Carolina Sanctions

  • Webberlang said...

    Website for Whitney shows 72 per night...so to my understanding (using South Carolina fans logic)....if you stay at a hotel for an extended period of time you get a 80% discount.....If any of you guys owns a hotel let me know when I can get that 80% discount.

    You have a clear agenda...why else would this siuation with South Carolina have you obsessing and posting with such glee? Half truths and misinformation at this point is all you have.

    Even if all you say is truth, why would anyone with a life, true love and loyalty for their own university, care about South Carolina and possible sanctions, or any other program for that matter?

    signature image

    "Here are provided seats of meditative joy, where shall rise again the destined reign of Troy." Virgil

    usctrojan1

  • usctrojan1 said...

    You have a clear agenda...why else would this siuation with South Carolina have you obsessing and posting with such glee? Half truths and misinformation at this point is all you have.

    Even if all you say is truth, why would anyone with a life, true love and loyalty for their own university, care about South Carolina and possible sanctions, or any other program for that matter?

    Thank you very much. He says he doesn't care but why post so much about it in this thread....Webberlang has an agenda...

    *****South Carolina Fans please stop posting in this thread (that's all he or she wanted).******

    signature image signature image signature image

    srturf

  • srturf said...

    Thank you very much. He says he doesn't care but why post so much about it in this thread....Webberlang has an agenda...

    *****South Carolina Fans please stop posting in this thread (that's all he or she wanted).******

    I don't have an agenda whatsoever....You're boy Joseph Baker knows I am not a fan of any rival school for SC or a fan of a school in the same conf.....just an observer trying to get opinions.My team is completely irrelevant in this matter. I made a prediction of sanctions that the NCAA will hand down with no agenda whatsoever and you SC fans went bonkers.

    signature image signature image

    Notorious URB

  • I will say he's not a Clemson fan. I will vouch for him on that.

    "I used to walk up a hill to and from school in my days", says every Clemson student ever.

    jbaker8537

  • usctrojan1 said...

    You have a clear agenda...why else would this siuation with South Carolina have you obsessing and posting with such glee? Half truths and misinformation at this point is all you have.

    Even if all you say is truth, why would anyone with a life, true love and loyalty for their own university, care about South Carolina and possible sanctions, or any other program for that matter?

    Half truths?? I looked at the hotels website for rates....seriously? and it really doesn't bother me at all what happens to SC it was a good topic to discuss that nobody has brought up yet and I wanted to gather some opinions instead of debating. Like I said 2 people responded to the original post and that was one guy that said they would get similiar to OSU and J Baker said the NCAA would accept SC's self imposed sanctions. That was it out of 204 posts. @ USCtrojan I would be curious to know what sanctions you think will be handed to SC.

    signature image signature image

    Notorious URB

  • Joseph Baker said...

    I will say he's not a Clemson fan. I will vouch for him on that.

    Appreciate that....maybe we can get some opinions finally.

    signature image signature image

    Notorious URB

  • Webberlang said...

    Appreciate that....maybe we can get some opinions finally.

    Most S Car analysts do not anticipate a post season ban or loss of tv. From what I've read it seems that worst case scenario is a slight increase in scholarships and a bigger fine. I trust their opinions mainly because I pay for it. I'm not really worried.

    signature image signature image signature image

    COOTERUSC77

  • Webberlang said...

    Half truths?? I looked at the hotels website for rates....seriously? and it really doesn't bother me at all what happens to SC it was a good topic to discuss that nobody has brought up yet and I wanted to gather some opinions instead of debating. Like I said 2 people responded to the original post and that was one guy that said they would get similiar to OSU and J Baker said the NCAA would accept SC's self imposed sanctions. That was it out of 204 posts. @ USCtrojan I would be curious to know what sanctions you think will be handed to SC.

    Spin, spin, spin....you're exposed. Just man up and claim your clear, and most unbecoming "spite", revel in it. It's certainly what cheap, low class women do..why not join them?

    Why else start this thread and persist in bring in every rumor and gossip to make your uninformed points?

    How does any of this benefit your program?

    By weakening your competition?

    That logic would be sadly lacking in sportsmanship and a true desire to compete at the highest level. You want your enemies strong.

    I can not, nor will I, venture to guess what sanctions, if any, should befall South Carolina - I don't have any facts to make any judgement at all, and even if I did, I'm not about to lower myself to state it. No matter what happens, innocent fans, players and the university itself will suffer. God knows, the NCAA is neither always right, or just.

    signature image

    "Here are provided seats of meditative joy, where shall rise again the destined reign of Troy." Virgil

    usctrojan1

  • Webberlang said...

    I don't have an agenda whatsoever....You're boy Joseph Baker knows I am not a fan of any rival school for SC or a fan of a school in the same conf.....just an observer trying to get opinions.My team is completely irrelevant in this matter. I made a prediction of sanctions that the NCAA will hand down with no agenda whatsoever and you SC fans went bonkers.

    Okay I believe you about not being a Clemson fan but you still have an agenda. Others have given their opinion and you keep coming back at them with articles. Like CooterUSC77 says we have been told by our insiders who we trust and don't sugar coat stuff that we shouldn't worry about the so called "Hammer". The compliance dept looked over things instead of doing the right thing (an honest mistake IMO). But we will not know anything until a judgement has been made by the NCAA.

    signature image signature image signature image

    srturf

  • usctrojan1 said...

    Spin, spin, spin....you're exposed. Just man up and claim your clear, and most unbecoming "spite", revel in it. It's certainly what cheap, low class women do..why not join them?

    Why else start this thread and persist in bring in every rumor and gossip to make your uninformed points?

    How does any of this benefit your program?

    By weakening your competition?

    That logic would be sadly lacking in sportsmanship and a true desire to compete at the highest level. You want your enemies strong.

    I can not, nor will I, venture to guess what sanctions, if any, should befall South Carolina - I don't have any facts to make any judgement at all, and even if I did, I'm not about to lower myself to state it. No matter what happens, innocent fans, players and the university itself will suffer. God knows, the NCAA is neither always right, or just.

    Ohh really the letter from the NCAA sent to SC was a rumor and misleading information??? I forgot what a rumor mill the NCAA heads are.

    signature image signature image

    Notorious URB

  • srturf said...

    Okay I believe you about not being a Clemson fan but you still have an agenda. Others have given their opinion and you keep coming back at them with articles. Like CooterUSC77 says we have been told by our insiders who we trust and don't sugar coat stuff that we shouldn't worry about the so called "Hammer". The compliance dept looked over things instead of doing the right thing (an honest mistake IMO). But we will not know anything until a judgement has been made by the NCAA.

    Cooter was the 3rd person that gave an opinion and that was just recently....what are you talking about?

    you said " But we will not know anything until a judgement has been made by the NCAA."

    THATS WHY I WANTED TO START THE BOARD.... TO SPECULATE....obviously speculating is frowned upon?

    This post was edited by Notorious URB on 2/23/2012 at 2:44 PM

    signature image signature image

    Notorious URB

  • srturf said...

    we have been told by our insiders who we trust and don't sugar coat stuff.

    Ha.

    "There will be no coaching turnover this offseason"- Tony Morrell

    signature image signature image signature image

    Clemson

  • Clemson said...

    Ha.

    "There will be no coaching turnover this offseason"- Tony Morrell

    Dont ever remember reading that.

    signature image signature image signature image

    COOTERUSC77

  • Actually the words were more along the lines of, "At this time we don't feel there will be any coaching changes during this offseason." Coaching changes can never be predicted unless there is just an obvious reason they will be leaving.

    "I used to walk up a hill to and from school in my days", says every Clemson student ever.

    jbaker8537

  • Joseph Baker said...

    Coaching changes can never be predicted unless there is just an obvious reason they will be leaving.

    Like the long hammer of the NCAA?

    signature image signature image signature image

    Clemson

  • COOTERUSC77 said...

    Most S Car analysts do not anticipate a post season ban or loss of tv. From what I've read it seems that worst case scenario is a slight increase in scholarships and a bigger fine. I trust their opinions mainly because I pay for it. I'm not really worried.

    Neither did OSU analysts...

    signature image signature image signature image

    Sir Mix A Lot

  • FL Buckeye said...

    Neither did OSU analysts...

    Really???

    signature image signature image signature image

    COOTERUSC77

  • Clemson said...

    Like the long hammer of the NCAA?

    NCAA ruling is a lot easier to gauge on precendence. You cannot compare coaching changes to the NCAA situation.

    signature image signature image signature image

    COOTERUSC77

  • Clemson said...

    Like the long hammer of the NCAA?

    Haha yea something like that. Are they still as harsh as they were in the 80's? If so, I think all is going to be well.

    "I used to walk up a hill to and from school in my days", says every Clemson student ever.

    jbaker8537

  • Joseph Baker said...

    Haha yea something like that. Are they still as harsh as they were in the 80's? If so, I think all is going to be well.

    ZING!

    signature image signature image signature image

    COOTERUSC77

  • COOTERUSC77 said...

    Really???

    Yes, almost every writer covering osu predicted no bowl ban.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Sir Mix A Lot

  • That includes all the writers at Bucknuts too. Very few predicted bowl ban

    signature image signature image signature image

    Sir Mix A Lot

  • Time to pay up Webberlang!!!!

    "I used to walk up a hill to and from school in my days", says every Clemson student ever.

    jbaker8537

  • looka dis fool

    signature image

    3

    cockengr

  • cockengr said...

    looka dis fool

    I don't like beaming in my own spotlight, but... Who the hell am I fooling! Pay up Webberlang!

    "I used to walk up a hill to and from school in my days", says every Clemson student ever.

    jbaker8537