The Blue Board

Urban Myth.

I'd wager you couldn't point to even one thread involving SoCal and, say ...Oregon, or any other school other than South Carolina...in which a South Carolina fan rushes in to inject the 'who is the real USC" debate. Anyone that's spent more than thirty seconds on any college football board knows all too well how this debate materializes: In a thread involving South Carolina, and say...any school other than Southern Cal...if a South Carolina fan refers to their school as USC, invariably some SoCal douche rushes in to transform the thread into a debate/referendum on "who is the real USC?", and trot out their talking points which are apparently kept at the ready. I guess you're just oblivious to the fact that every time you make that argument you come across totally pathetic and emotionally needy...like some chick with a sandy vag over another broad wearing the same dress she has on.

Do you really expect anyone to believe it's fans from little old South Carolina patrolling the interwebz for threads involving SoCal in which its fans might have had the temerity to refer to their school as USC???

When South Carolina lost their federal appeals, they were only allowed to use the interlocking logo look for the duration of that school year... But were disallowed from receiving royalties.

If South Carolina were to continue using the interlocking logo look after being defeated at the federal court of appeals level, they would set themselves up for a no-win trademark infringement lawsuit that would result in a judgment against them that would have quite a few 0's to the left of the decimal point.

Would love to see examples of an athletic program at the University still using the interlocking logo look, though. That would be something interesting to run by my trademark attorney for his explanation.

After all, when you are denied a trademark based upon an infringement of someone else's right to use that look, If you continue Infringing upon someone else's trademark, you do so at your own risk.

You DO NOT want to challenge brdcstr knowledge on anything he voices an opinion on...trust me.

Believe me...they and the rest of their conference, have made it a big issue, claiming that they are the "real USC"....I wouldn't even challenge the fact that there are two USCs, one east and one west, and certainly, both are "real". We've heard so much about this from them and their conference mates, we will voice a response...and I've posted mine, using their own words, from their own official university site.

I use so car and so cal in threads just to avoid the stupid argument. So cal fans need to get a grip.

From your lips...

I see sarcasm is still an effective way to insult stupid people in a way they can't understand

Actually, I think I'm using sarcasm to an intelligent human being....if you or others were stupid, my point would be lost, and not worth the effort.

I've made all the points I care to on this subject, and I stand by my comment that I have respect for South Carolina. We are well aware that no one in the SEC respects USC, It is what it is..neither one of us should give a damn what the other thinks.

Simply passing the time here, there is thunder and lightening outside