Online Now 3443

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2552
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3342
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

State of the Union thread.....

  • TroyTide said...

    I was in high school when Bush was in his last year in office so don't give me that crap about how it suddenly matters to me now.

    And at any rate the deficit does matter. The Dems can't make the reality of the deficit go away by saying "we'll what about Bush? Blah blah blah"

    No one is saying it isn't, it's just hypocritical horse shit to sit there and say "wow. They can't solve the recovery. What are they doing?" ..." Wow. Why can't they get the deficit down? What the hell?". I'm not saying that's you, but that sums up the general consensus of the right over the last four years.

    Current deficits are on a downward trajectory under current law. They are "going away", at least until 2019.

    That's where the focus of ALL of Congress should be. Future deficits in relation to entitlements. Period.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • TroyTide said...

    About 10 trillion of the 16 Trillion falls to Dem administrations. It was a bipartisan effort but the Dem Presidents bear the burden.

    However party lines aside it is Bush and Obama that bear the vast majority of it all by themselves. The two most fiscally irresponsible presidents in American history.

    It is also fair to blame the Dems now because they are the only party that doesn't even acknowledge it is a problem and has absolutely no intention of correcting it at all.

    Lol

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • CMXI said...

    When you have GOP presidential candidates saying broadly that they'll cut taxes by 20 percent, and offering practically no specific offsets, it makes no sense. Clearly the deficit doesn't matter there, so how can the GOP attack the left on the basis of deficit-reduction?

    They have offered plenty of specifics through budgets etc. granted there was a lot of vagueness in those plans too because if the elections approaching, but they have certainly offered much more than the Democrats.

    TroyTide

  • TroyTide said...

    They have offered plenty of specifics through budgets

    Source. Exact numbers please.

    And if the first three words of your source are '5 point plan', I'm going to die laughing.

    ramssuperbowl99

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    No one is saying it isn't, it's just hypocritical horse shit to sit there and say "wow. They can't solve the recovery. What are they doing?" ..." Wow. Why can't they get the deficit down? What the hell?". I'm not saying that's you, but that sums up the general consensus of the right over the last four years.

    Current deficits are on a downward trajectory under current law. They are "going away", at least until 2019.

    That's where the focus of ALL of Congress should be. Future deficits in relation to entitlements. Period.

    We'll be 20 trillion in debt by the time Obama leaves office. And that 2019 crap is BS and we all know it.

    TroyTide

  • TroyTide said...

    They have offered plenty of specifics through budgets etc. granted there was a lot of vagueness in those plans too because if the elections approaching, but they have certainly offered much more than the Democrats.

    Show me where Mitt Romney laid out specific spending cuts that would've covered even 50% of his proposed tax cuts.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • ramssuperbowl99 said...

    Source. Exact numbers please.

    And if the first three words of your source are '5 point plan', I'm going to die laughing.

    The GOP has presented multiple budgets over the past couple of years. The Dems have presented none.

    TroyTide

  • TroyTide said...

    We'll be 20 trillion in debt by the time Obama leaves office. And that 2019 crap is BS and we all know it.

    Yea the CBO decided to start lying once a Dem president came into office. Sigh.

    Please stop focusing on nominal numbers.

    This post was edited by BamaLivesFootba on 2/13/2013 at 3:39 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • CMXI said...

    Show me where Mitt Romney laid out specific spending cuts that would've covered even 50% of his proposed tax cuts.

    What the hell does Romney have to do with anything? Dude has no say so in our governing process at all, never has at the federal level. He was just as vague as his adversary and any other person running for president.

    TroyTide

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Yea the CBO decided to start lying once a Dem president came into office. Sigh.

    Please stop focusing on nominal numbers.

    The aggregate debt matters.

    TroyTide

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Yea the CBO decided to start lying once a Dem president came into office. Sigh.

    Please stop focusing on nominal numbers.

    The CBO is almost always on the low end of projections. They consistently underestimate the growth rate of government programs, and rate of Congress's spending both of which are impossible to predict.

    TroyTide

  • TroyTide said...

    What the hell does Romney have to do with anything? Dude has no say so in our governing process at all, never has at the federal level. He was just as vague as his adversary and any other person running for president.

    You said GOP presidential candidates have offered "plenty of specifics" - I contend that they haven't. If they have, you should be able to show me where those offsets were in Romney's plan.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • TroyTide said...

    The aggregate debt matters.

    Aggregate of what?

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • TroyTide said...

    The CBO is almost always on the low end of projections. They consistently underestimate the growth rate of government programs, and rate of Congress's spending both of which are impossible to predict.

    Ok. Who should I be listening to then? The Cato Institute?

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Ok. Who should I be listening to then? The Cato Institute?

    Probably the American Enterprise Institute.

    signature image

    You may run like Hayes, but you hit like $*!#

    CockAtLaw

  • CMXI said...

    You said GOP presidential candidates have offered "plenty of specifics" - I contend that they haven't. If they have, you should be able to show me where those offsets were in Romney's plan.

    I said the GOP.

    TroyTide

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Ok. Who should I be listening to then? The Cato Institute?

    The CBO is nothing more than a human calculator it can only put out what you put in. Since politicians always put in made up numbers, always on the low end as far as cost of course, you get projections based off those BS numbers. That's all the CBO does.

    TroyTide

  • TroyTide said...

    The CBO is nothing more than a human calculator it can only put out what you put in. Since politicians always put in made up numbers, always on the low end as far as cost of course, you get projections based off those BS numbers. That's all the CBO does.

    Again. Who should I read?

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • TroyTide said...

    I said the GOP.

    Ah, alright, then I'll ask about the GOP.

    In Boehner's counter-offer during the Fiscal Cliff negotiations, this is what he proposed:

    "$800 billion in unspecified "pro-growth tax reform that closes special-interest loopholes and deductions while lowering rates."

    $600 billion in Medicare savings that would include raising the eligibility age and "structural Medicare reform." That may be a euphemistic reference to Rep. Paul Ryan's voucher ("coupon care") system, but it's not clear from the information available if that's the case.

    $300 billion in other "mandatory" savings, including farm subsidies and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, which provides food subsidies to low- and no-income Americans. No further details on these proposed cuts are available.

    $200 billion through lowering the cost of living adjustments for all federal beneficiaries, including Social Security recipients. This is the "chained CPI" we've been hearing about for the past year and a half that would cut benefits over time.

    $300 billion in further unspecified cuts to discretionary spending."

    Do you see how few specifics there are here? If you can show me anywhere where the GOP clarified these "unspecified" cuts, I'd greatly appreciate it.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • TroyTide said...

    The CBO is nothing more than a human calculator it can only put out what you put in.

    The word you're looking for is 'model'. We would also accept 'projection system'.

    nofuckingshit.jpg

    ramssuperbowl99

  • ramssuperbowl99 said...

    The word you're looking for is 'model'. We would also accept 'projection system'.

    nofuckingshit.jpg

    As in, Nate Silver's "model" that projected Obama's win in the 2012 election with 100% accuracy.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • CMXI said...

    You said GOP presidential candidates have offered "plenty of specifics" - I contend that they haven't. If they have, you should be able to show me where those offsets were in Romney's plan.

    And what pray tale are the Democrat's plan? You had your #3 person go out this past Sunday and say spending is not a problem. Do you really think any positive dialog can be had when Pelosi is spouting this crap?

    Who gives a shit what Romney's plan was, he's not the president. What we do know, is that Obama is a fucking moron to think that what he laid out last night wouldn't add a dime to the deficit?

    How do you feel about the Senate controlled by Harry Reid has failed, by law, to pass a budget in the last 3 years?

    This post was edited by NLeininger on 2/13/2013 at 4:05 PM

    NLeininger

  • ramssuperbowl99 said...

    The word you're looking for is 'model'. We would also accept 'projection system'.

    nofuckingshit.jpg

    The numbers it bases its projections off of are faulty numbers given to it by politicians. Politicians who never actually stick to those numbers. The problem isn't the CBO it's the information the CBO is given. The CBO isn't allowed to project anything based off numbers that Congress doesn't directly give to it.

    TroyTide

  • CMXI said...

    Ah, alright, then I'll ask about the GOP.

    In Boehner's counter-offer during the Fiscal Cliff negotiations, this is what he proposed:

    "$800 billion in unspecified "pro-growth tax reform that closes special-interest loopholes and deductions while lowering rates."

    $600 billion in Medicare savings that would include raising the eligibility age and "structural Medicare reform." That may be a euphemistic reference to Rep. Paul Ryan's voucher ("coupon care") system, but it's not clear from the information available if that's the case.

    $300 billion in other "mandatory" savings, including farm subsidies and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, which provides food subsidies to low- and no-income Americans. No further details on these proposed cuts are available.

    $200 billion through lowering the cost of living adjustments for all federal beneficiaries, including Social Security recipients. This is the "chained CPI" we've been hearing about for the past year and a half that would cut benefits over time.

    $300 billion in further unspecified cuts to discretionary spending."

    Do you see how few specifics there are here? If you can show me anywhere where the GOP clarified these "unspecified" cuts, I'd greatly appreciate it.

    Hell of a lot more detail than anything that Obama has produced.

    NLeininger

  • NLeininger said...

    And what pray tale are the Democrat's plan? You had your #3 person go out this past Sunday and say spending is not a problem. Do you really think any positive dialog can be had when Pelosi is spouting this crap?

    Who gives a shit what Romney's plan was, he's not the president. What we do know, is that Obama is a fucking moron to think that what he laid out last night wouldn't add a dime to the deficit?

    How do you feel about the Senate controlled by Harry Reid has failed, by law, to pass a budget in the last 3 years?

    Budgets are so not cool to Democrats. You aren't going to get anywhere with that argument they will just come back and say its the GOPs fault somehow that the Senate hasn't passed a budget.

    Budgets and deficits are no big deal just numbers to them.

    TroyTide