The Blue Board

He won 14 games that year. Laugh all you want, but what is the most amount of games that a USC QB won in a year?

I'll wait for your answer.

NorCal is the place right now. Texas has potential with RG3, Luck, and Stafford but it's too early.

I agree with what you said in your other post as well. That was an idiotic article Jason Cole wrote since
the premise was over the last 30 years QB from southern California suck. Over the last 30 years or
(since 1984) southern California has produced more solid NFL QB's than any other region (5 of the top 35)
and California has 8 of the top 35.

Sure, there have been busts, but when you produce a lot of QB's, you'll have a lot busts.
If the article would have said after Carson Palmer, SoCal hasn't produced with the next couple years
deciding what kind of careers Mark Sanchez and Alex Smith had, then I would say ya that's fair.

If you are like the state of Florida, who have only produced 2 good QB's in the last 30 years, you
won't have many busts (at least 3, Tebow will make 4) because they aren't even good enough to get to the NFL.

I'll ask again, because it is a simple question... how many USC QBs have won 14 games in a season?

How many USC QBs have won 14 games or more in a season?

I don't think you have 300k+ QBs ya silly goose.

How do I know I win? You bring up Sandusky.

Winner!

Everytime I hear a Penn State fan I think to myself "you mean to tell me you was the fastest sperm in daddies ball sack"

I actually cant recall one, and if Matt Barkley does it will be beacuse of NFL lockout and he crossed the picketline with the rest of his team to play with replacements.

The best part of an obvious troll like this is that it gives me an excuse to continue the discussion
about a topic in which the region I'm talking about has completely dominated for the past 60 years.
Thanks for the bump.

Using P.F.R.'s Approx Value player rating, here is a state by state breakdown of where the
Top 100 QB's in the NFL since 1950 were born and the state that their high school is located in.
(If a player had a different birth state than high school state, both states were counted,
although I think the H.S. state the QB played in, is better). So, the total numbers below
will exceed 100, because a few will have 2 states.

The top 100 is equivalent to roughly the top 5-10% of all QB's who have played in the NFL
and approx the top 25% of all QB's who at one point were the primary starting QB for
an NFL team during at least one season (approx 400 QB's).

----------------------------------------
How many of the Top 100 NFL
QB's has each state produced?
----------------------------------------

California 28 QB's ..........(15 from southern Cal, 13 from northern Cal)

Pennsylvania 12 QB's
Texas 11 QB's

3 states w/ 5 QB's
New York, Ohio, Louisiana

4 QB's
Washington, Illinois, Mississippi

3 QB's
Kansas, Virginia, N.Carolina, Alabama

2 QB's
Iowa, Wisconsin, Indiana, Michigan, New Jersey, Georgia, Florida,

1 QB
Oregon, Idaho, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Kentucky,
Tennessee, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Connecticut.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

That article uses the last 30 years as it's reference point to "try" and say that
the southern California region has been terrible for NFL QB's the last 3 decades.
Yet, within those last 30 years, southern California has produced 5 QB's on
that list of the top 100 NFL QB's.

That means that SoCal has produced more NFL QB's on the all-time top 100,
just in the last 30 years (5), than anybody besides northern California,
who has also produced (5) in the last 30 years.

Basically that moronic article written by Jason Cole is like saying something as stupid as this -
"You have no game with the ladies, because you only had sex with 5 of the 10 most beautiful
women at our college. The other 5 turned you down."

Stupid = stupid - end of story.