-
Hawkifish
- 5 stars Rating: 93
6070 votes total - VotH Moderator
- Heisman
- (27605)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
amrollZ71 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5046 votes total - All Conference
- (12546)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
amrollZ71 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5046 votes total - All Conference
- (12546)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
amrollZ71 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5046 votes total - All Conference
- (12546)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Hawkifish
- 5 stars Rating: 93
6070 votes total - VotH Moderator
- Heisman
- (27605)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Hawkifish
- 5 stars Rating: 93
6070 votes total - VotH Moderator
- Heisman
- (27605)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
OmegaBuckeye said...
You haven't linked or argued any evidence other than anecdotal stories of your sister's mother's cousin's boyfriend told you something. Marriages have strengthened in the Netherlands after gay partnerships were introduced.
Are you afraid that married couples are going to look at a gay couple and suddenly decide that the whole heterosexual thing isn't for them? Are your Christian family values so weak that they can be destroyed simply by someone getting married that you don't think should? Did interracial marriages destroy the family unit like everyone thought it would back in the 50's?
If homosexuality wasn't natural, I dare say you wouldn't see it occur in animal populations. It does.
Why don't you wage your ideological war on the real enemy of Marriage, which is 'not marriage'. The only threat to marriage is people not being married. People shacking up without getting married should be your focus. Or, Jesus said that the only reason you can get a divorce is if the woman commits adultery. So don't let the 50% of US marriages that end in divorce end unless the woman commits adultery. Of course, then you would be facing off against a much larger group instead of a marginalized minority that makes an easy scapegoat (which is why the politicians stick with gay people instead of going after adulterers). Or, you could continue to let your politicians control you by giving you an imagined enemy to rail against.
goodnews
- 5 stars Rating: 81
650 votes total - Varsity
- (1681)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
goodnews
- 5 stars Rating: 81
650 votes total - Varsity
- (1681)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
amrollZ71 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5046 votes total - All Conference
- (12546)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
shoeless7777
- 5 stars Rating: 98
12557 votes total - Heisman
- (27662)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CorchBlue
- 5 stars Rating: 89
4832 votes total - King Wolverine247 Mod
- All Conference
- (14198)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CorchBlue
- 5 stars Rating: 89
4832 votes total - King Wolverine247 Mod
- All Conference
- (14198)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
blue2468 said...
Re: The whole "natural" argument
As far as I am aware, only Humans marry each other, does that make it unnatural since we are the only species that does?
The internet isn't natural, should we stop using that?
Playing video games and watching sports aren't natural, should we stop that as well?
What about if you lose a limb? Since prosthetics aren't natural, should you be force to have a stub the rest of your life?
Re: The whole "conception/baby making" argument
Should men/women that are not able to pro-create not be allowed to get married?
If pro-creation is a requirement of marriage, then shouldn't you have to take a fertility test in order to be married?
Re: The whole "traditional" argument
Owning slaves and women are property is a "traditional" concept, should be go back to those laws?
Just because it is a traditional, doesn't make it a good one.
Re: The whole "you need both male-female figures to create a good society" argument
Since you believe this, then you also believe that single parents do not deserve their children and we should take them all away. A marriage license should be required to have babies.
Anything else I miss?
shoeless7777
- 5 stars Rating: 98
12557 votes total - Heisman
- (27662)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
blue2468 said...
Ok, I present this challenge to you.
Since people are not born gay, I want you to stop liking women and starting liking guys.
Since it's just a choice, this will be easy, right?
I'll wait.
amrollZ71 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5046 votes total - All Conference
- (12546)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
amrollZ71 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5046 votes total - All Conference
- (12546)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CorchBlue
- 5 stars Rating: 89
4832 votes total - King Wolverine247 Mod
- All Conference
- (14198)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BamaLivesFootba
- 4 stars Rating: 68
6681 votes total - The Incorruptibles
- Heisman
- (20626)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
rtota334 said...
If you don't think people are born straight or gay then under a certain set of circumstances couldn't you have turned out gay? If you think that there is no way you would ever be attracted to guys i rest my case that people are born straight or gay.
amrollZ71 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5046 votes total - All Conference
- (12546)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
shoeless7777
- 5 stars Rating: 98
12557 votes total - Heisman
- (27662)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
amrollZ71 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5046 votes total - All Conference
- (12546)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
shoeless7777 said...
its a really tough question and not sure there is a definitive answer to the question or not ?? If in fact there was hard core proof one way or the other then i would suppose we would have seen it on here before now . what we have are lots of great articles and opinion polls etc but not absolute proof ...makes this argument / thread that much better
amrollZ71 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5046 votes total - All Conference
- (12546)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Grand Slam
- 4 stars Rating: 79
2865 votes total - Verne Lundquist
- Redshirt
- (3455)
- 28 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
theFightingtide said...
Lol. Get out of here with that my friend. You can refute all of that scientific evidence with one question? How about no, in order for someone to become gay i think that people are in certain situations(Not sure what?) and they make that decision themselves. I am not in that situation, and I am a Christian and by my beliefs would be damned to hell if I chose that path and did not regress from it.
CorchBlue
- 5 stars Rating: 89
4832 votes total - King Wolverine247 Mod
- All Conference
- (14198)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
amrollZ71 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5046 votes total - All Conference
- (12546)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | ... | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | ... | 33












The Attack on Religious Freedom