Online Now 3444

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2255
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3477
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

The BTN is crushing it

  • I don't care as long as I get to see my team.

    I don't care about the millions being made off of us. I don't see anyone on this board benefitting or getting money from the big and sec network but whatever floats your boat.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Danielle Hunter, Jamario Rasco, Anthony FREAK Johnson.. DL wrecking crew of 2013.

    Lesticals

  • getmyjive11 said...

    The Sat companies will surely pick up the SEC Network, but the question is, how much will they pay? You are fooling yourself if you think it will be more than the Big Ten network. Again, it will be all about selling 3rd tier content. Only alums and fans watch 3rd tier content. The national audience doesn't come into play here.

    The SEC's main television rights are held by ESPN and CBS. From what I understand, any game not broadcast by ESPN or CBS would be eligible for an SEC network. A lot of attractive basketball games are not broadcast by either one of those channels. Almost no baseball games are broadcast on those channels and the SEC has a much better brand of baseball. All coaches shows, press conferences, and possibly game replays could be shown, although I am not totally positive about the replays

    The only difference I see is that SEC teams would only have one football game apiece available to be shown on the SEC network and it would be a lower level game, while the Big 10 network has a few more conference football games. At least I believe that would be the only difference, unless somebody can show me where I am wrong

    This post was edited by aubie25 on 6/4/2012 at 5:15 PM

    aubie25

  • USMCAG said...

    Does the big x network have an online feature?

    Yes... You realize the SEC, will be copying the business model already in place , correct?

    signature image signature image signature image

    BBucksorBeGone8

  • BBucksorBeGone8 said...

    Yes... You realize the SEC, will be copying the business model already in place , correct?

    It's been successful, so why not?

    signature image signature image signature image

    SEC SEC SEC!!!

    USMCAG

  • USMCAG said...

    It's been successful, so why not?

    B1G = leaders
    SEC = followers

    signature image

    BrodieMSU

  • USMCAG said...

    It's been successful, so why not?

    I was answering your question.

    signature image signature image signature image

    BBucksorBeGone8

  • BBucksorBeGone8 said...

    I was answering your question.

    I like the big X, no comp,aints from me. I just think the SEC network will be successful as well.

    signature image signature image signature image

    SEC SEC SEC!!!

    USMCAG

  • aubie25 said...

    The SEC's main television rights are held by ESPN and CBS. From what I understand, any game not broadcast by ESPN or CBS would be eligible for an SEC network. A lot of attractive basketball games are not broadcast by either one of those channels. Almost no baseball games are broadcast on those channels and the SEC has a much better brand of baseball. All coaches shows, press conferences, and possibly game replays could be shown, although I am not totally positive about the replays

    The only difference I see is that SEC teams would only have one football game apiece available to be shown on the SEC network and it would be a lower level game, while the Big 10 network has a few more conference football games. At least I believe that would be the only difference, unless somebody can show me where I am wrong

    Again, you have to put yourself in the shoes of the cable companies. I have no doubt that they can go into most SEC states and demand a good subscriber rate for the SEC network to be on the standard tier of programming. However, even with satellite being on the standard tier, you are only going to get about 10% of the in-market (SEC footprint) rate when you go outside the SEC market area. And if there will only be one football game per team that will be shown on the network as you say, that makes it even harder to sell the product. I think PSU has had 3 or 4 games on the BTN each year.

    Originally, Comcast (based out of Philly) did not offer the BTN on the standard tier. Fans were pissed and were dropping Comcast for Satellite or Verizon. This caused Camcast to do an about-face, but the BTN still only gets, I think,$ 0.75 per viewer in PA vs $1.10 in the rest of the Big Ten footprint. I am willing to bet that something similar will happen in Texas, only they will have a MUCH harder time getting the cable companies there to fold because aTm plays second fiddle to the Longhorns. It wouldn't surprise me if they never get it on the standard tier in that state.

    getmyjive11