Online Now 3468

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1947
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3473
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

The Official Michigan, MSU Thread (CLOSED)

  • Leon McQuay has set his decision date for January 4th it appears and Derrick Green is down to Michigan and Tennessee.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Stealing Sparty's recruits and owning them on the field since 1898

    msucantmakebcs

  • What are some of you guy’s hearing about Sims’s, Bell, and Gholston?

    Sims’s and Gholston should probably come back. Bell would be making a mistake IMO if he came back.

    I keep seeing the TJ Duckett comparison’s for him but I think he could be a poor man’s Stephen Jackson in the right situation. He has a nice all-around game.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CWEBB

  • CWEBB said...

    What are some of you guy’s hearing about Sims’s, Bell, and Gholston?

    Sims’s and Gholston should probably come back. Bell would be making a mistake IMO if he came back.

    I keep seeing the TJ Duckett comparison’s for him but I think he could be a poor man’s Stephen Jackson in the right situation. He has a nice all-around game.

    Bells gone

    Sims I'd put at 50%
    Gholston 40% gone

    Sims has potential, but hasn't been healthy for a year.

    Gholston said he's coming back but he's got a kid so who knows

    copemoney0

  • CWEBB said...

    What are some of you guy’s hearing about Sims’s, Bell, and Gholston?

    Sims’s and Gholston should probably come back. Bell would be making a mistake IMO if he came back.

    I keep seeing the TJ Duckett comparison’s for him but I think he could be a poor man’s Stephen Jackson in the right situation. He has a nice all-around game.

    All have children. A will be going to the NFL I believe. I agree with your assessment of sims and Gholston but they need to take care of family first. They can finish their degree later. As far as Bell goes, if he comes back I'll try to kick his ass for being that dumb. He'd get 40 carries a game and he'd be abused. ( I don't think Bell has a child )

    signature image signature image signature image

    DWags

  • D.Wags said...

    exactly!!! He will have no influence whatsoever. I've quoted this for March reference.

    Ok?

    MrWoodson

  • Wiltfong article on the 2014 kids that look to be among the best. Tons of ND and tOSU love.

    http://247sports.com/Article/The-Midwests-Top-Juniors-Expected-to-Be-Nationally-Recruited-107323

    xxmgobluexx

  • Denard plead guilty to driving on suspended license

    lol

    The Michigan Difference

    Denard Robinson of Michigan Wolverines pleads guilty to driving with suspended or revoked license - ESPN

    Michigan senior quarterback Denard Robinson pleaded guilty Monday to a driving with a suspended or revoked license charge, according to court records.

    espn.go.com

    copemoney0

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    Wiltfong article on the 2014 kids that look to be among the best. Tons of ND and tOSU love.

    http://247sports.com/Article/The-Midwests-Top-Juniors-Expected-to-Be-Nationally-Recruited-107323

    Not shocking, considering those 2 schools just went a combined 24-0 in the regular season.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Not shocking, considering those 2 schools just went a combined 24-0 in the regular season.

    Agreed. They are traditional powers who did that also. An upstart does something like that and they still have to scratch and claw to get noticed.

    xxmgobluexx

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    Agreed. They are traditional powers who did that also. An upstart does something like that and they still have to scratch and claw to get noticed.

    I see what you did there . . . but it's what I've been saying for awhile. It takes at least a decade of constant winning to boost your recruiting profile, even moreso if you're in a talent-poor state. Look at Wisky; they're just starting to push for top 25 classes (if this one doesn't fall apart it's rated #25) and they've pulled 4-stars from CA and NJ. It's taken them 20+ years to do so.

    MSU is in a little better position in terms of raw in-state talent, though competing with UM for that talent is always going to be an issue. Still, MSU is closer to OH and IN than Wisky (why Wisky can't snag a couple IL 4-stars/year is beyond me . . . then again, IL talent in general seems to scatter to the four winds; Pocic to LSU, Isaac to USC, Treadwell to East Jesus West Kentucky), so I estimated 10ish years of consistent winning to start to raise MSU's recruiting profile. We'll see if that happens (both the winning and the recruiting windfall).

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    I see what you did there . . . but it's what I've been saying for awhile. It takes at least a decade of constant winning to boost your recruiting profile, even moreso if you're in a talent-poor state. Look at Wisky; they're just starting to push for top 25 classes (if this one doesn't fall apart it's rated #25) and they've pulled 4-stars from CA and NJ. It's taken them 20+ years to do so.

    MSU is in a little better position in terms of raw in-state talent, though competing with UM for that talent is always going to be an issue. Still, MSU is closer to OH and IN than Wisky (why Wisky can't snag a couple IL 4-stars/year is beyond me . . . then again, IL talent in general seems to scatter to the four winds; Pocic to LSU, Isaac to USC, Treadwell to East Jesus West Kentucky), so I estimated 10ish years of consistent winning to start to raise MSU's recruiting profile. We'll see if that happens (both the winning and the recruiting windfall).

    I didn't mean it as a slight, though I see how it can be read that way. It will take years for MSU to raise their profile, but they need Michigan to crash at the same time to truly make a dent. Look at ND, they have been "down" for 20 years, yet you wouldn't know it with how they have recruited this whole time.

    xxmgobluexx

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    I didn't mean it as a slight, though I see how it can be read that way. It will take years for MSU to raise their profile, but they need Michigan to crash at the same time to truly make a dent. Look at ND, they have been "down" for 20 years, yet you wouldn't know it with how they have recruited this whole time.

    Yea, my theory is that it takes 2 generations for a program's allure to fade. The people growing up during the glory years will pass that love on to their kids, even if those kids grow up in an era when that team sucks (last 20 years for ND). If the program continues to slide, however, the grandkids of the original "glory year" people are unlikely to share the love of the program.

    It also works out that that 40-50 year time gap is about the time since MSU last won an NC/was consistently good. I actually think if they hadn't imploded with Perles that the program would be at or above Wisconsin's current level in the conference, but that Probabtion + Saban-Williams-JLS era really sucked the last bit of life out of the program. Figure in '90 MSU had won 2 of the last 4 Big 10 titles and could have really built something up, but Papa Perles got greedy, etc. etc. blah blah blah lol.

    Bottom line: MSU pretty much has had to rebuild from scratch; most of the people who remember the glory days have grandkids who are D-1 prospect age and that's just not going to cut it as a "national power".

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Yea, my theory is that it takes 2 generations for a program's allure to fade. The people growing up during the glory years will pass that love on to their kids, even if those kids grow up in an era when that team sucks (last 20 years for ND). If the program continues to slide, however, the grandkids of the original "glory year" people are unlikely to share the love of the program.

    It also works out that that 40-50 year time gap is about the time since MSU last won an NC/was consistently good. I actually think if they hadn't imploded with Perles that the program would be at or above Wisconsin's current level in the conference, but that Probabtion + Saban-Williams-JLS era really sucked the last bit of life out of the program. Figure in '90 MSU had won 2 of the last 4 Big 10 titles and could have really built something up, but Papa Perles got greedy, etc. etc. blah blah blah lol.

    Bottom line: MSU pretty much has had to rebuild from scratch; most of the people who remember the glory days have grandkids who are D-1 prospect age and that's just not going to cut it as a "national power".

    I agree with everything you have to say.

    There are recent examples of the #2 state school jumping over the historical state power. Texas A&M has flipped some kids and is pulling in kids that usually would be Longhorn locks. Was the move to the SEC the key? Upsetting Bama seemed to get it rolling. Winning the Heisman has done wonders.
    Auburn won a natty, but they recruited well before hand, and they hardly made a dent in Bama recruiting. That could have been different if they didn't faceplant after winning the natty though.

    xxmgobluexx

  • copemoney0 said...

    Denard plead guilty to driving on suspended license

    lol

    The Michigan Difference

    I'd rather have a player get a suspended license than beat up a hockey player.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Stealing Sparty's recruits and owning them on the field since 1898

    msucantmakebcs

  • Michigan's matte helmets for the bowl game look awesome. I think the uniform looks pretty good too, alot better than the Bama one. But aren't B1G teams supposed to be wearing colored jerseys this year?

    Sounds like MSU and TCU are gonna get some alternate Nike Unis too

    This post was edited by Braintrust on 12/18/2012 at 3:03 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    Braintrust

  • Braintrust said...

    Michigan's matte helmets for the bowl game look awesome. I think the uniform looks pretty good too, alot better than the Bama one. But aren't B1G teams supposed to be wearing colored jerseys this year?

    Sounds like MSU and TCU are gonna get some alternate Nike Unis too

    I hate that Brandon is messing with the helmet. Messing with the jersey was bad enough.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Stealing Sparty's recruits and owning them on the field since 1898

    msucantmakebcs

  • msucan'tmakebcs said...

    I'd rather have a player get a suspended license than beat up a hockey player.

    Wasn't that 3-4 years ago?

    Can you not find any newer material?

    Let me guess your next response: Ski Masks!!!

    copemoney0

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    I agree with everything you have to say.

    There are recent examples of the #2 state school jumping over the historical state power. Texas A&M has flipped some kids and is pulling in kids that usually would be Longhorn locks. Was the move to the SEC the key? Upsetting Bama seemed to get it rolling. Winning the Heisman has done wonders. Auburn won a natty, but they recruited well before hand, and they hardly made a dent in Bama recruiting. That could have been different if they didn't faceplant after winning the natty though.

    You can also look at the Florida school cycles and UCLA starting to be a regular competitor against USC, though those states have enough in-state talent to spread around.

    OK State/Oklahoma might be an interesting dynamic to watch, though OK State has a billionaire booster to help things out lol. Oregon is a meh recruiting state, but they're right next to CA.

    I kind of put MSU as the "fall back school for 4-stars"; able to beat out PSU and Nebraska for recruits from time to time, but is generally going to lose the battles to ND, UM, tOSU, Bama, etc. except for kids who grew up Spartan fans (4-stars like Hicks and Jones don't have tOSU offers, for instance, nor did a guy like Burkland back in '10). MSU's recruiting classes seem to be mostly high 3-star guys, some 4-star In-state MSU fans and usually 1-2 out of state 4-stars.

    One thing that's interesting is that MSU has made some major inroads into PA. They pulled 4-star Clemons out of there in '11, 4-star Cox in '12, 4-star Terry this year. Tyler Boyd set an official to MSU for Jan. 18th as well. I thought this staff would hit IL harder, but it looks like PA is becoming the #3 state outside of OH and MI. GA and IN are next in line.

    In terms of quality, I don't think MSU is recruiting poorly. I don't believe they're recruiting at a nationally competitive level either. In the conference, I'd say only Ohio State and UM are amassing demonstrably more raw talent; Nebraska is probably ahead of MSU by a little bit, though not as much as the rankings alone would indicate (they have quite a few 4-star JUCOs that don't stick around more than 2 years, making their older recruiting classes a poor indication of how much talent is on that team).

    That said, it's not that MSU has demonstrably MORE talent than a lot of conference teams; on par with Wisky, probably slightly ahead of Iowa and Northwestern, making only IL/IN/Purdue and Minny truly "less talented" than MSU. That leads to more toss-up games, and while MSU can beat just about anyone in the conference, it remains true that most of the conference is equally capable of beating MSU.

    That makes it harder to sustain success; we saw how thin the margin was for MSU this year, and they fell on the wrong side of a lot of close games. You see similar situations at Iowa and Wisconsin, and I suspect with PSU and Nebraska moving forward.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • copemoney0 said...

    Wasn't that 3-4 years ago?

    Can you not find any newer material?

    Let me guess your next response: Ski Masks!!!

    lol You're the one making fun of a player for a suspended license. MSU is the only one with violent crimes commited. It is sad that you think they don't matter because they happened 3 years ago. I bet that hockey player agrees with you that since it was three years ago it doesn't matter.

    This post was edited by msucantmakebcs on 12/18/2012 at 3:10 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    Stealing Sparty's recruits and owning them on the field since 1898

    msucantmakebcs

  • BTW, get ready for some MSU attrition. Predictions have been revised from a 15 man class to up to 20. There are only 12 scholarship SRs leaving by our count, plus Bell (likely).

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • msucan'tmakebcs said...

    lol You're the one making fun of a player for a suspended license. MSU is the only one with violent crimes commited. It is sad that you think they don't matter because they happened 3 years ago. I bet that hockey player agrees with you that since it was three years ago it doesn't matter.

    Nobody out of Ann Arbor even cares about the Rather Hall Brawl.

    signature image

    steveschneider

  • SpartanRocky said...

    BTW, get ready for some MSU attrition. Predictions have been revised from a 15 man class to up to 20. There are only 12 scholarship SRs leaving by our count, plus Bell (likely).

    MSU would have 76 players on scholarship not counting any 2013 commits and removing the 12 SRs. Bell is probably gone, so that brings it down to 75. 10 people will leave the program/get injured by next year? that's alot.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Braintrust

  • Braintrust said...

    MSU would have 76 players on scholarship not counting any 2013 commits and removing the 12 SRs. Bell is probably gone, so that brings it down to 75. 10 people will leave the program/get injured by next year? that's alot.

    That's not right. I think there's 11 with Hoover coming back and counting Conroy's scholarship.

    Maybe there are a couple of injuries + some of the RS SRs who don't want to be back-ups this year. 2009 class has largely been an on-field disappointment, despite the high national ranking.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    That's not right. I think there's 11 with Hoover coming back and counting Conroy's scholarship.

    Maybe there are a couple of injuries + some of the RS SRs who don't want to be back-ups this year. 2009 class has largely been an on-field disappointment, despite the high national ranking.

    Are Ray and Freeman still on scholarship? I didnt think they were

    Fonoti and Hoover are coming back, so i count only 9 (Caper, McDonald, Ruhland, White, Norman, Gardiner, Adams, M White, Conroy)

    signature image signature image signature image

    Braintrust

  • SpartanRocky said...

    BTW, get ready for some MSU attrition. Predictions have been revised from a 15 man class to up to 20. There are only 12 scholarship SRs leaving by our count, plus Bell (likely).

    Culling the herd. thumbsup

    xxmgobluexx