Online Now 2861

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1754
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 4569
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

The Official Michigan, MSU Thread (CLOSED)

  • elmn12 said...

    It's mainly because I think we need more depth and more talent overall. Also, we need a few players who can be game changers on both sides of the ball. I think Dymonte Thomas is that kind of player, but we need a few more guys like Malik McDowell and Damon Webb who have the potential to be elite at their position once they've been on campus for a couple of years.

    I was just kidding.

    MrWoodson

  • jimtaco said...

    I'm curious State fans, do you think Narduzzi will get looks for a head coaching job? I know there was talk about heading to A&M as a coordinator but that obviously didn't happen. Is he now set at State?

    I've maintained that he wants his first gig to be at an AQ spot. His stomping grounds are the Midwest and Northeast, so a Big East/ACC job is most likely. He's getting paid well enough that he won't leave EL for another DC position (at college at least), so it depends on what jobs are available this offseason.

    There's some speculation that he'll just wait for MD to retire and take over MSU, but I think it's much more likely that he goes to another conference. I don't think he's at MSU for the '14 season.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • MrWoodson said...

    We had a hell of a time containing NW's rushing game on the edge. They were holding all day but I don't think we got a single holding penalty until the 4th QTR. And Siemien was throwing darts. You guys really need to be on your A game defensively. It's a dangerous team to defend against. If you can get your rushing game going and keep their offense off the field, that should help a lot. With Denard out, our rushing game was predictably poor. Most of our best rushing plays were scrambles by Gardner.

    Yea, our guys looked a half step slow the whole game vs. Nebraska. Pass D broke down late, but MSU also had their 4th and 5th string safeties playing on the final drive at the FS and nickel spots due to injuries. Still held Martinez to under 50% passing, 2 TDs and 3 INTs.

    Mark is a legit RB; I consider Northwestern's Colter/Mark to be about 90-95% of T-Mart/Abdullah. Less TO prone though, which can be problematic.

    Nice to play them off of a bye; gets some of MSU's legs back.

    I think it'll be a relatively high scoring game; MSU's OL has looked better in the last 2 games and is still healthy (longest stretch for the starting 5 to be together all season . . . which is crazy). Northwestern seems bad against the pass, and I think MSU can have success passing to set up the run. I also would be shocked if MSU held Northwestern under 21-24 points; these fast-paced spreads with quick QBs are just a pain in the rear for MSU.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Yea, our guys looked a half step slow the whole game vs. Nebraska. Pass D broke down late, but MSU also had their 4th and 5th string safeties playing on the final drive at the FS and nickel spots due to injuries. Still held Martinez to under 50% passing, 2 TDs and 3 INTs.

    Mark is a legit RB; I consider Northwestern's Colter/Mark to be about 90-95% of T-Mart/Abdullah. Less TO prone though, which can be problematic.

    Nice to play them off of a bye; gets some of MSU's legs back.

    I think it'll be a relatively high scoring game; MSU's OL has looked better in the last 2 games and is still healthy (longest stretch for the starting 5 to be together all season . . . which is crazy). Northwestern seems bad against the pass, and I think MSU can have success passing to set up the run. I also would be shocked if MSU held Northwestern under 21-24 points; these fast-paced spreads with quick QBs are just a pain in the rear for MSU.

    NW is bad against the pass. My only concern with passing a lot is that it does not chew up enough clock and a incomplete pass or two can result in a quick three and out. You are much better off running if you can (we couldn't). If you pass a lot and it causes you to keep giving the ball back to NW without taking much time off the clock, you will regret it. Their offense is dangerous.

    MrWoodson

  • MrWoodson said...

    NW is bad against the pass. My only concern with passing a lot is that it does not chew up enough clock and a incomplete pass or two can result in a quick three and out. You are much better off running if you can (we couldn't). If you pass a lot and it causes you to keep giving the ball back to NW without taking much time off the clock, you will regret it. Their offense is dangerous.

    I'm more thinking of hitting a 15 yard crossing route on the first play, then running a screen for 5-6 yards, THEN running. Not saying Maxwell should throw it 45 times lol. Their LBs seem pretty solid at keeping their gaps, so I'd like to back them off the LOS a little bit. Then again, running Lawrence Thomas at them seemed to work very well against Nebraska . . . he may end up at FB/H-back full time.

    I'd like to see a little more of Nick Hill. He had 2 carries for 30 yards against Nebraska and could really provide some burst. MSU has been dying for a #2 RB option, even if he only gets 7-9 carries/game.

    I gotta say, interior pass pro improved a ton once Treadwell was able to play LG full time. Jack Allen is much more comfortable at C. Glad to see France able to handle a speed rusher (Eric Maritin) and MSU didn't give up a sack vs. Nebraska. Now Northwestern has a nice pair of DEs too, so I'd like to see some strong play against them before I annoint the OL officially slightly below average, up from cover your eyes awful lol.

    This post was edited by SpartanRocky on 11/13/2012 at 1:27 PM

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    I'm more thinking of hitting a 15 yard crossing route on the first play, then running a screen for 5-6 yards, THEN running. Not saying Maxwell should throw it 45 times lol. Their LBs seem pretty solid at keeping their gaps, so I'd like to back them off the LOS a little bit. Then again, running Lawrence Thomas at them seemed to work very well against Nebraska . . . he may end up at FB/H-back full time.

    I'd like to see a little more of Nick Hill. He had 2 carries for 30 yards against Nebraska and could really provide some burst. MSU has been dying for a #2 RB option, even if he only gets 7-9 carries/game.

    I gotta say, interior pass pro improved a ton once Treadwell was able to play LG full time. Jack Allen is much more comfortable at C. Glad to see France able to handle a speed rusher (Eric Maritin) and MSU didn't give up a sack vs. Nebraska. Now Northwestern has a nice pair of DEs too, so I'd like to see some strong play against them before I annoint the OL officially slightly below average, up from cover your eyes awful lol.

    We couldn't run against NW, but excluding Denard we haven't been able to run against anyone. If you can run against them, you will be fine.

    MrWoodson

  • jimtaco said...

    I'm curious State fans, do you think Narduzzi will get looks for a head coaching job? I know there was talk about heading to A&M as a coordinator but that obviously didn't happen. Is he now set at State?

    Duzzi pretty much used that "visit" to TAMU for a raise. I think it came out afterward in a RCR that he really had no interest going there. If he's gone, it'll be for a BCS conference gig, which i dont think will come to him until 2014. He had some MAC/Smaller schools interested in him over the summer.

    This post was edited by Braintrust on 11/13/2012 at 1:55 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    Braintrust

  • SpartanRocky said...

    I'm more thinking of hitting a 15 yard crossing route on the first play, then running a screen for 5-6 yards, THEN running. Not saying Maxwell should throw it 45 times lol. Their LBs seem pretty solid at keeping their gaps, so I'd like to back them off the LOS a little bit. Then again, running Lawrence Thomas at them seemed to work very well against Nebraska . . . he may end up at FB/H-back full time.

    I'd like to see a little more of Nick Hill. He had 2 carries for 30 yards against Nebraska and could really provide some burst. MSU has been dying for a #2 RB option, even if he only gets 7-9 carries/game.

    I gotta say, interior pass pro improved a ton once Treadwell was able to play LG full time. Jack Allen is much more comfortable at C. Glad to see France able to handle a speed rusher (Eric Maritin) and MSU didn't give up a sack vs. Nebraska. Now Northwestern has a nice pair of DEs too, so I'd like to see some strong play against them before I annoint the OL officially slightly below average, up from cover your eyes awful lol.

    OL looked solid against Nebraska. Not sure if it's their awful run defense, or if its because they were all healthy. Roushar said it's the first time all 5 OL practiced together all week since the CMU game.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Braintrust

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Yea, he consistently trolls. Like the subtle jab that winning in Spartan Stadium is "a joke" after they win by 2 points at home? They get bragging rights for a year, but I don't think either fanbase can call a road game a "gimmee" in this rivalry.

    What do you expect me to say? I'm telling the truth when I say our hardest games are at home. Playing a 5-5 team on the road is supposed to be one of the hardest games? If that's the case then I will be upset if we don't go 11-0 to start the season.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Stealing Sparty's recruits and owning them on the field since 1898

    msucantmakebcs

  • Jandy said...

    I think Gardner has potentially answered the QB question for next year, but I would still wonder about both lines, RB, and WR.

    Lewan would help definitely, but it'll be an overall inexperienced group even with him. Without him, the group could really struggle.

    If all of this holds water, then the team will be asking Gardner to do a lot, and potentially with bad protection. That's a recipe for injury, so how comfortable are you with Morris/Bellamy?

    Ultimately, I think Gardner's size will help, along with him having been able to get on the field this year. But I still wonder who he will be throwing/handing the ball to.

    The DL is basically the same as this year. The Wrs are basically the same minus Roundtree. The only question mark is OL. If Lewan returns we will have almost no flaws.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Stealing Sparty's recruits and owning them on the field since 1898

    msucantmakebcs

  • Braintrust said...

    OL looked solid against Nebraska. Not sure if it's their awful run defense, or if its because they were all healthy. Roushar said it's the first time all 5 OL practiced together all week since the CMU game.

    I was shocked at how well MSU ran against Nebraska. Nebraska's run D looked bad, but if you took away tOSU and UCLA (which featured O's completely unlike MSU's), Nebraska's run D was giving up around 114 yards/game and 3.0 YPC. That's a pretty great run D and is close to what MSU's current rush D stats are (MSU actually giving up 3.6 YPC). They had nuked every pro-style rushing game, including Wisconsin's.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • msucan'tmakebcs said...

    What do you expect me to say? I'm telling the truth when I say our hardest games are at home. Playing a 5-5 team on the road is supposed to be one of the hardest games? If that's the case then I will be upset if we don't go 11-0 to start the season.

    Well, that 5-5 team nearly knocked off UM at home . . . and UM/MSU could still end up with the same record at the end of the year. I wouldn't call that game a gimmee by any stretch of the imagination.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • msucan'tmakebcs said...

    The DL is basically the same as this year. The Wrs are basically the same minus Roundtree. The only question mark is OL. If Lewan returns we will have almost no flaws.

    Rushing O sans Shoelace? That sounds like a big question mark to me.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • Jandy said...

    You display a lot of faith, which makes sense because you're a fan. Pardon me if I still wonder.

    You have 2/3 of an ineffective RB group returning.

    Roundtree might be the only senior, but him and Gardner are arguably your 2 best WR's. You say you like others; well who?

    You say you have experienced DL who you expect to step in, but I wonder why they haven't already. Who are you talking about?

    I believe your LB's and CB's will be fine, but Safety is another question IMO. Don't underestimate the leadership that is required from the S position. Trenton Robinson was a huge loss for us despite the fact that very talented players have stepped up to replace him.

    We still have Dileo and Gallon and have the potential to get the # 1 WR recruit in Treadwell. Frank Clark, Brennan Beyer, Jibreel Black, and Ondre pipkins will be back on the DL.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Stealing Sparty's recruits and owning them on the field since 1898

    msucantmakebcs

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Rushing O sans Shoelace? That sounds like a big question mark to me.

    The offense is just as effective through two games without him. shrug

    This post was edited by msucantmakebcs on 11/13/2012 at 2:08 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    Stealing Sparty's recruits and owning them on the field since 1898

    msucantmakebcs

  • msucan'tmakebcs said...

    The offense is just as effective through two games without him. shrug

    Your offense is still 81st in the country, wouldn't say its flawless.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Braintrust

  • msucan'tmakebcs said...

    The offense is just as effective through two games without him. shrug

    I was just asking about the running game. UM put up 155 and 133 yards vs. Minny and Northwestern on the ground. That's far from your nearly 200 YPG average.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • Braintrust said...

    Your offense is still 81st in the country, wouldn't say its flawless.

    I'd say we've stepped our offense since DR got hurt scoring 35 and 38 points the last two games.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Stealing Sparty's recruits and owning them on the field since 1898

    msucantmakebcs

  • msucan'tmakebcs said...

    The DL is basically the same as this year. The Wrs are basically the same minus Roundtree. The only question mark is OL. If Lewan returns we will have almost no flaws.

    The DL is basically the same next year? You lose 2/4 starters. It may end up just as good, but not because it is 'basically the same'.

    The top 4 WR's (as listed in your Iowa depth chart) are Roundtree, Gardner, Gallon and Dileo. Assuming Gardner moves to QB, that means you will be losing 2 of your 4 best WR's. Furthermore, Roundtree and Gardner would both be on the field at the same time fairly frequently, correct? As the X and Z WR's, I believe? With Gallon lined up in the slot. The issue with this is that two tall, deep-threat WR's will have to be identified. I assume Jerald Robinson will take one spot, and Darboh the other? Again, it could work perfectly fine, or it could not. I presume that chemistry issues could exist in the first half of the year, and the pass game could ultimately rely on how well Gardner gels with the WR's.

    I agree OL is a question mark, but disagree that it's answered if Lewan returns. If Lewan comes back, it definitely helps, but the entire interior will be very inexperienced (from what I understand). While having 2 inexperienced guards with experienced players at both OT's and C could work, having an inexperienced C between those 2 G's could hurt a lot. If you think there's going to be improvement at those 3 spots, I think you're crazy, and several of your fellow UM posters have agreed that the interior OL has struggled this year.

    signature image

    laconophilia is everywhere... http://www.msu-umbig10.com/

    Jandy

  • Jandy said...

    The DL is basically the same next year? You lose 2/4 starters. It may end up just as good, but not because it is 'basically the same'.

    The top 4 WR's (as listed in your Iowa depth chart) are Roundtree, Gardner, Gallon and Dileo. Assuming Gardner moves to QB, that means you will be losing 2 of your 4 best WR's. Furthermore, Roundtree and Gardner would both be on the field at the same time fairly frequently, correct? As the X and Z WR's, I believe? With Gallon lined up in the slot. The issue with this is that two tall, deep-threat WR's will have to be identified. I assume Jerald Robinson will take one spot, and Darboh the other? Again, it could work perfectly fine, or it could not. I presume that chemistry issues could exist in the first half of the year, and the pass game could ultimately rely on how well Gardner gels with the WR's.

    I agree OL is a question mark, but disagree that it's answered if Lewan returns. If Lewan comes back, it definitely helps, but the entire interior will be very inexperienced (from what I understand). While having 2 inexperienced guards with experienced players at both OT's and C could work, having an inexperienced C between those 2 G's could hurt a lot. If you think there's going to be improvement at those 3 spots, I think you're crazy, and several of your fellow UM posters have agreed that the interior OL has struggled this year.

    Didn't you hear? They're going 11-0 easily to start the year, and will be a flawless team!

    signature image signature image signature image

    Braintrust

  • Braintrust said...

    Didn't you hear? They're going 11-0 easily to start the year, and will be a flawless team!

    That was an incredibly stupid thing to say.

    signature image

    Rabid

  • Braintrust said...

    Didn't you hear? They're going 11-0 easily to start the year, and will be a flawless team!

    The problem is, you filtered everything else out and read everything as you wrote it.

    xxmgobluexx

  • RabidWolverine said...

    That was an incredibly stupid thing to say.

    It's okay, I know we were being trolled by an expert.

    Also, I love your signature.

    signature image

    laconophilia is everywhere... http://www.msu-umbig10.com/

    Jandy

  • Jandy said...

    It's okay, I know we were being trolled by an expert.

    Also, I love your signature.

    What signature?

    (I have them turned off wink_msu)

    This post was edited by Rabid on 11/13/2012 at 2:51 PM

    signature image

    Rabid

  • Read a great article today by Rexrode discussing MSU hoops team. I agree that the experiment of having Nix Payne on the floor at the same time needs to end. I'd also like to see Appling spend some time at SG allowing for Valentine to take over at PG.

    Sounds like we will see more of Valentine at the point tonight which should help him get some more experience.

    I think eventually this is the type of lineup we will see this year:
    Nix/Payne C
    Dawson PF
    Valentine/Trice PG
    Appling SG
    Harris SF.

    signature image

    steveschneider