Online Now 2620

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2459
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3027
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

The Official Michigan, MSU, and 1 Random Guy from Arky Thread

  • DWags said...

    NICEEEEEEEEE!

    It was. I bet watching a game with you would be fun.

    signature image signature image signature image

    MSU isn't a very good football program.. takes year of consistent winning to get to that level. - copemoney 1/22/13

    Due51

  • Jandy said...

    And Notre Dame beat UM.

    I fail to see how yardage is more indicative of talent level than end result.

    You specifically referenced the front seven.

    Michigan dominated on both sides in the trenches.

    Notre Dame was a better team than Michigan, not saying they weren't, but talent level was very similar to Michigan.

    signature image signature image signature image

    mriderblue12

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Trying to prevent someone from taking that the wrong way. Just saying that you have to come out of the gate ready to go; starting slow against Bama is not an option, unless you have Cam Newton.

    I agree, but ND's problem isn't that they had too much time to prepare.

    MrWoodson

  • Due51 said...

    It was. I bet watching a game with you would be fun.

    Film and beer is fun. I don't get guys that don't understand how fun it is to watch film and drink beer.

    signature image signature image signature image

    DWags

  • DWags said...

    Film and beer is fun. I don't get guys that don't understand how fun it is to watch film and drink beer.

    I could watch all night. No homo.

    signature image signature image signature image

    MSU isn't a very good football program.. takes year of consistent winning to get to that level. - copemoney 1/22/13

    Due51

  • mriderblue12 said...

    Notre Dame was a better team than Michigan, not saying they weren't, but talent level was very similar to Michigan.

    Good god. It's never ending

    copemoney0

  • Due51 said...

    I could watch all night. No homo.

    lol

    signature image signature image signature image

    DWags

  • Wait. You mean you didn't take ND +28.5? Suckers.

    signature image signature image signature image

    MSU isn't a very good football program.. takes year of consistent winning to get to that level. - copemoney 1/22/13

    Due51

  • From here on out I will no longer be posting in the other MSU/UM thread. It's this thread only for me.

    signature image

    laconophilia is everywhere... http://www.msu-umbig10.com/

    Jandy

  • MrWoodson said...

    ND is better now too. ND nearly lost to Purdue and Pitt to start the season.

    Uh.. They played Pitt towards the end of the season...

    signature image signature image signature image

    Braintrust

  • Jandy said...

    And Notre Dame beat UM.

    I fail to see how yardage is more indicative of talent level than end result.

    Eh, I'm going to disagree with you there. I take yardage into account when looking at how good teams are in their wins/losses. If you're outgained by 100 yards, but win, you probably forced some RZ TOs or got a couple of big returns.

    It also depends on WHEN the yardage comes. In '09, MSU had a couple of huge pass plays to Martin in the end of blowouts vs. Wisconsin and PSU (one was over 90 yards and the other over 70). That makes the yardage #s look better than they actually were.

    In UM's case, a 60 yard difference isn't something that should be outright ignored.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • Jandy said...

    From here on out I will no longer be posting in the other MSU/UM thread. It's this thread only for me.

    I am good with it. Which thread had the ban bets?

    Why don't we just ask the mods to merge the two threads? :)

    xxmgobluexx

  • MrWoodson said...

    I agree, but ND's problem isn't that they had too much time to prepare.

    Not their only problem, but Bama looked sharper. ND had the "deer in headlights" look and played like their first game.

    On the recruiting front, NJ 4-star powerback Gerald Owens reached out to MSU because he liked the way Bell was used this year; just picked up an offer. He's a top 100 guy, 96 rating.

    http://247sports.com/Player/Gerald-Owens-20631

    Has S. Car and Wisky offers as well.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    I am good with it. Which thread had the ban bets?

    Why don't we just ask the mods to merge the two threads? :)

    Merge threads is not a function mods have cry I wish we did though.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • Braintrust said...

    Uh.. They played Pitt towards the end of the season...

    Ok. Well they almost lost to Purdue. ND probably improved over the course of the season more than Bama simply because Golson was a RS FR starting his first games in college this year. He was pulled and replaced by Tommy Rees in several games early in the season. Bama has been this good all year long. They even lost a couple starters to injury along the way.

    This post was edited by MrWoodson on 1/8/2013 at 10:01 AM

    MrWoodson

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Eh, I'm going to disagree with you there. I take yardage into account when looking at how good teams are in their wins/losses. If you're outgained by 100 yards, but win, you probably forced some RZ TOs or got a couple of big returns.

    It also depends on WHEN the yardage comes. In '09, MSU had a couple of huge pass plays to Martin in the end of blowouts vs. Wisconsin and PSU (one was over 90 yards and the other over 70). That makes the yardage #s look better than they actually were.

    In UM's case, a 60 yard difference isn't something that should be outright ignored.

    I do think it's significant, I think it shows that UM may have outplayed ND in several phases of the game.

    It doesn't, however, suggest to me that UM has more talent than ND. Do you believe that it does?

    signature image

    laconophilia is everywhere... http://www.msu-umbig10.com/

    Jandy

  • Jandy said...

    I do think it's significant, I think it shows that UM may have outplayed ND in several phases of the game.

    It doesn't, however, suggest to me that UM has more talent than ND. Do you believe that it does?

    UM has MORE talent than ND? No. They're comparable, but ND's has had an extra year in BK's system compared to UM. ND has slightly more if you look at the recruiting rankings over the last 4-5 years, but I think it's a wash at that point. ND is out-recruiting UM this season though.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Not their only problem, but Bama looked sharper. ND had the "deer in headlights" look and played like their first game.

    On the recruiting front, NJ 4-star powerback Gerald Owens reached out to MSU because he liked the way Bell was used this year; just picked up an offer. He's a top 100 guy, 96 rating.

    http://247sports.com/Player/Gerald-Owens-20631

    Has S. Car and Wisky offers as well.

    13 months still to go, but the 2014 class for MSU looks to be a special one for them. Great start, and look to be in on some highly touted kids.

    xxmgobluexx

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Merge threads is not a function mods have cry I wish we did though.

    It will be phased in this year though, right?

    xxmgobluexx

  • I'm really getting my hopes up for Michigan's future OL. This year 'Bama showed that a dominant OL can push around a good DL. If (and I know all reasons that this can go wrong) Michigan's OL can even be in the same neighborhood as 'Bama's was this season, then they could have a strong 2-3 year stretch simply because they would be able to run the ball effectively on a lot of the teams they played.

    hownowbrowncow

  • Would I get in trouble for posting something that TomVH wrote on WolverineNation about Michigan and their scholarship numbers? It's a couple months old, and mostly just a summary but I think it's fairly interesting and does a good job explaining Michigan's recruiting strategy.

    hownowbrowncow

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    13 months still to go, but the 2014 class for MSU looks to be a special one for them. Great start, and look to be in on some highly touted kids.

    Yea, not sure what's up with Henderson/Kizer. There's another 4-star from OH, Dareian Watkins, that's visiting MSU for the MSU - tOSU Bball game in a few weeks. He's a 93 4-star.

    Kind of surprised, but MSU is also high on Kyle Trout's list as well as Nick Richardson. Now, I'm sure UM sweeps in and scoops them all up, but for now it's fun to dream wink_msu

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • elmn12 said...

    Would I get in trouble for posting something that TomVH wrote on WolverineNation about Michigan and their scholarship numbers? It's a couple months old, and mostly just a summary but I think it's fairly interesting and does a good job explaining Michigan's recruiting strategy.

    Where did you post it? I'm sure you can post in ITT; if not, would you mind PMing it to me?

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • Let's look at actual numbers (recruiting wise)
    You guys are upset, and I understand that, but let's look at some numbers to help explain why Michigan is at where they're at right now. This is not meant to be a dig on any of the players, or say that rankings are always right because they're a prediction/projection. That being said, take a look at what Brady Hoke and Al Borges are working with on offense.

    2008 Class still on the roster:

    OL still on the roster (3):
    Ricky Barnum: #4 OG, 80 rating (equals a 4-star)
    Elliott Mealer: #42 OT, 77 rating (equals a 3-star)
    Patrick Omameh: #113 OT, 69 rating (probably a 3-star)

    WR still on the roster (1):
    Roy Roundtree: #104 WR, 3-star

    You have three OL, one WR, no QB's, RB's or TE's from this class still on the roster.

    One four-star remaining on the offensive roster.

    2009 Class still on the roster:

    QB (1):
    Denard Robinson: #7 ATH, 81 rating (equals a 4-star)

    OL (2):
    Taylor Lewan: #12 OT, 80 rating (4-star)
    Michael Schofield: #40 OT, 77 rating (3-star)

    RB (2):
    Fitz Toussaint: #28 RB, 79 rating (4-star)
    Vince Smith: #60 RB, 77 rating (3-star)

    WR (1):
    Jeremy Gallon: #80 ATH, 77 rating (3-star)

    One QB, Two OL, Two RB and One WR.

    Three 4-stars left on the offensive roster.

    2010 class still on the roster:

    WR (5):
    Devin Gardner: #5 QB, 4-star
    Ricardo Miller: #27 WR, 4-star
    Jeremy Jackson: #39 WR, 4-star
    Jerald Robinson: #99 WR, 3-star
    Drew Dileo: #137 ATH, 3-star

    RB (1):
    Stephen Hopkins: #50 RB, 3-star

    There are No QB's and No OL left from this class (Christian Pace was the only one committed), only One RB left and he has moved to FB and there are three 4-stars left.

    2011 class still on the roster:

    QB (1):
    Russell Bellomy: #35 QB, 3-star

    RB (2):
    Justice Hayes: #22 RB, 4-star
    Thomas Rawls: #84 RB, 3-star

    OL (2):
    Jack Miller: #53 DT, 3-star
    Chris Bryant: #37 OG, 3-star

    One 4-star on the roster and No WR's.

    So now let's sum all of that up. Between the 2008 and 2011 classes, which is 4 recruiting classes you have the following:

    Two QB's. One 4-star and one 3-star. Two quarterbacks over four classes, and Bellomy was added late after Hoke got here.
    SEVEN OL. TWO 4-stars. That's seven offensive linemen over four classes. To compare, there are 8 OL commits between the 2012 and 2013 class. There were TWO 4-star OL in these four classes, Michigan has double that amount in the 2013 class alone. One OL commit between these four classes (Barnum) was ranked in the top five at his position, however Lewan is an exception here obvs.
    Six WR's. Two of the receivers were four-stars, one of them (Ricardo Miller) is nowhere to be found. Only two, including Miller were in the top 75 at their position.
    Five RB's, one has moved to FB. Two 4-stars, none in the top 25 at the RB position.

    (additional comments by TomVH)

    - The 2010 class is a big hit to the roster. There are ZERO OL on the roster and only three WR's contributing, and Hopkins is at fullback, which you could consider a loss since Michigan now has two scholarship fullbacks.

    - Also, here's a comparison between these numbers and just how good the 2012 and 2013 classes are:

    The 2012 and 2013 classes combined have 10 commitments ranked in the top 10 at their position. The 2008-2011 classes (four classes) had two commitments ranked in the top 10 at their position.
    Michigan has six 4-star OL commits in the 2012 and 2013 classes, five of which are in the top 10 at their position. The 2008-2011 classes had two, only one was in the top 10.
    Shane Morris is the first TOP FIVE QB that Michigan has landed since Ryan Mallett in 2007. That's for pro-style or dual threat qb's.
    Michigan has 14 commitments in the ESPN 150 in the 2012 and 2013 classes, they had 12 between 2008 and 2011 (That's total not just offense).

    hownowbrowncow

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Where did you post it? I'm sure you can post in ITT; if not, would you mind PMing it to me?

    I didn't realize it was quite that long, but I posted it anyways. TomVH made this because the people on the espn board were having a meltdown because our offense was doing badly.

    -I must not be communicating this properly, because the point of it was to show you that there is not the type of talent on this offense for the results you are looking for.

    I understand your argument about the QB's and being prepared, but like the post says, they recruited two quarterbacks over a four year period that are still on the roster. On top of that, had Hoke not gotten in on Bellomy they would only have Denard and Gardner right now.

    (This comment by him was probably the funniest part to me)

    hownowbrowncow