Online Now 3444

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1711
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3662
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

The Official Michigan, MSU, and 1 Random Guy from Arky Thread

  • Peterklima said...

    Personally, I have a hard time beleiving the "years of UM dominating MSU are over" and here is my rational:

    1. Dantonio and MSU have thrived while UM (and to a lesser degree OSU) fell off. Whether they can beat UM in the future remains to be seen. Anyway, all else being equal, it would not be surprising to see Hoke win 2/3rds or 3/4ths of the games once he has his recruits and MSU's roster is a little depleted from battling OSU/UM on the recruiting trail. Not sure that is "domination" though.

    2. We all saw RichRod get "dominated" by the entire B10 despite having the "name brand" of Michigan to pull in good recruits. MSU is not a coaching destination (as Saban proved) and it just can't afford to pay on the same level for new coaches. Dantonio is not a typical coach who is good enough to win, but not good enough to be considered for higher positions. They would have to hit a "home run" in a new coaching search to keep up with a (presumedly) resurgant Michigan.

    3. Given the rest economic exodus, the state of Michigan might not be able to sully support (through recruits, patrons, etc.) two big-time football programs for very long. Which one do you think will feel the pinch, while the other will be kept afloat based on national perception?

    So, there are at least some reason to believe Michigan can return to dominating MSU, if Hoke turns out to be a good coach over the years. Also, there is reason to believe that, if Hoke fails miserably and UM screws up the search for another coach, that MSU could "dominate" Michigan like they did under RichRod.

    Dude, come on. tOSU had ONE bad year; 3 straight Big 10 titles before that. In that time span, MSU has the most Big 10 wins of ANY program. That includes MSU's 6-7 2009 season.

    It's not as though MSU has been going 7-5 while UM has be going 6-6.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • jimtaco said...

    Spartanrocky must get tired of being the only State fan in this thread capable of having a rational discussion.

    Upvotes to you.

    There are a couple of other guys I have pretty good discussions with. Steve has been good to talk to this year.

    signature image signature image signature image

    WillyWolverine

  • jimtaco said...

    Spartanrocky must get tired of being the only State fan in this thread capable of having a rational discussion.

    Upvotes to you.

    I thought we were going to have a civil discussion today until Rocky came out with the, "I'll respect Michigan recruiting when they can beat MSU". Reminds me of the other day when he took a dig at Michigan then told everybody that we don't 5 pages of it to follow.

    xxmgobluexx

  • Maize&Blue said...

    So then recruiting matters. I don't really care if MSU falls hard. I care about Michigan being elite. I feel like we are on that track with our coaching staff and the way we are recruiting. I also believe that if MSU's recruiting doesn't pick up Michigan will begin to win a majority of the games again.

    It's a sliding scale between recruiting and coaching. Top recruiting + Top Coaching = NCs/dominant programs. Just having one or the other isn't enough to be a national power. MSU has some pretty good coaching (I'd say top 15-20), but the recruiting is not at the same level (top 35 or so). That's why you have a program with 11 W seasons, but not BCS bowls.

    UM has always had top talent. Compare your roster this season to MSU's; I bet UM started at LEAST twice the 4/5-stars that MSU did. I think your coaching is good. I don't know if it's great.

    Notre Dame is probably the biggest fly in your ointment. Kelly came in as a more decorated coach as Hoke, and EVERYONE predicted instant success. He's actually out-recruited UM, and ND has more talent than any Big 10 program except tOSU, and they're equals.

    All of that has given him back to back 8-5 years. Charlie Weiss went to not 1, but 2 BCS bowls, brought in the #2 class nationally . . . and was gone 3 years later.

    Just continue winning and you won't have me arguing these points.

    This post was edited by SpartanRocky on 2/20/2012 at 3:44 PM

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    I thought we were going to have a civil discussion today until Rocky came out with the, "I'll respect Michigan recruiting when they can beat MSU". Reminds me of the other day when he took a dig at Michigan then told everybody that we don't 5 pages of it to follow.

    See my above example about ND.

    What I said was that I'll care about how you guys are recruiting once you start beating MSU. State beat tOSU, UM and UGA last season, all of which had at least twice the 4-star players that MSU had on their rosters. Why would any Spartan start bowing down to UM based on recruiting rankings?

    Hear the UM fans tell it, they're in for 10 straight Ws over MSU (Big M aside). I'll believe it when it starts happening, and not before. What's wrong with wanting your rival to prove it on the field first?

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • jimtaco said...

    Spartanrocky must get tired of being the only State fan in this thread capable of having a rational discussion.

    Upvotes to you.

    lol

    Because there's so many Michigan fans here NOT distorting the past or anything.

    NigelUno

  • SpartanRocky said...

    It's a sliding scale between recruiting and coaching. Top recruiting + Top Coaching = NCs/dominant programs. Just having one or the other isn't enough to be a national power. MSU has some pretty good coaching, but the recruiting is not at the same level. That's why you have a program with 11 W seasons, but not BCS bowls.

    UM has always had top talent. Compare your roster this season to MSU's; I bet UM started at LEAST twice the 4/5-stars that MSU did. I think your coaching is good. I don't know if it's great.

    Notre Dame is probably the biggest fly in your ointment. Kelly came in as a more decorated coach as Hoke, and EVERYONE predicted instant success. He's actually out-recruited UM, and ND has more talent than any Big 10 program except tOSU, and they're equals.

    All of that has given him back to back 8-5 years. Charlie Weiss went to not 1, but 2 BCS bowls, brought in the #2 class nationally . . . and was gone 3 years later.

    Just continue winning and you won't have me arguing these points.

    Of course i agree about the Coaching plus recruiting equals the elite teams. The one thing i know right now is we have the recruiting. I am pretty confident in the coaching. This is why i believe Michigan fans continue to get excited and talk about recruiting. It means we have half the equation need to be elite and we feel confident we have the other part as well.

    signature image signature image signature image

    WillyWolverine

  • SpartanRocky said...

    See my above example about ND.

    What I said was that I'll care about how you guys are recruiting once you start beating MSU. State beat tOSU, UM and UGA last season, all of which had at least twice the 4-star players that MSU had on their rosters. Why would any Spartan start bowing down to UM based on recruiting rankings?

    Hear the UM fans tell it, they're in for 10 straight Ws over MSU (Big M aside). I'll believe it when it starts happening, and not before. What's wrong with wanting your rival to prove it on the field first?

    So you are not at all concerned about the recent recruiting disparity?

    FilthySanchez

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Dude, come on. tOSU had ONE bad year; 3 straight Big 10 titles before that. In that time span, MSU has the most Big 10 wins of ANY program. That includes MSU's 6-7 2009 season.

    It's not as though MSU has been going 7-5 while UM has be going 6-6.

    Over the last 4 years, this is what MSU faced in those two teams:

    3 years with RichRod at UM.

    3 years with Fickell at OSU (or State did not play OSU).

    After the top two teams, PSU has the next highest amount of talent...and MSU was 1-2 against them.

    I think MSU split with Iowa over those years

    MSU has "owned Wisco" to a degree. That is it.
    [EDIT: Looks like MSU is 3-2 against Wisco....with all of those wins coming at home]

    --

    How can you deny the downturn (or scheduling) at OSU/UM did not have a big effect on MSU's record? My comment, that we will see how Dantonio does when he has to play (and recruit) against those two resurgent programs is a legit one.

    ___

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by Peterklima on 2/20/2012 at 3:54 PM

    Peterklima

  • Maize&Blue said...

    Of course i agree about the Coaching plus recruiting equals the elite teams. The one thing i know right now is we have the recruiting. I am pretty confident in the coaching. This is why i believe Michigan fans continue to get excited and talk about recruiting. It means we have half the equation need to be elite and we feel confident we have the other part as well.

    I get it. What I'm saying is that don't expect MSU fans to acknowledge it until it shows up on the field.

    Whether or not you guys care about State fans' opinions is up to you. For the purposes of this thread though, I just wouldn't expect a stream of MSU posters coming in to kiss Hoke's ring.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    I get it. What I'm saying is that don't expect MSU fans to acknowledge it until it shows up on the field.

    Whether or not you guys care about State fans' opinions is up to you. For the purposes of this thread though, I just wouldn't expect a stream of MSU posters coming in to kiss Hoke's ring.

    On the other hand Hoke took a team many pegged for 7-5 or worse to 11-2 and a BCS win. Yes, MSU beat Michigan. Other than that metric, didn't Hoke's coaching already show up on the field?

    Big M

  • FilthySanchez said...

    So you are not at all concerned about the recent recruiting disparity?

    Not till UM starts beating MSU. Could happen as soon as this year.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    I get it. What I'm saying is that don't expect MSU fans to acknowledge it until it shows up on the field.

    Whether or not you guys care about State fans' opinions is up to you. For the purposes of this thread though, I just wouldn't expect a stream of MSU posters coming in to kiss Hoke's ring.

    Well you have to understand as well that Michigan fans are not going to fear the Spartans until you get the second part of that equation as well.

    signature image signature image signature image

    WillyWolverine

  • Maize&Blue said...

    Well you have to understand as well that Michigan fans are not going to fear the Spartans until you get the second part of that equation as well.

    Even if MSU wins in AA this year?

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • jimtaco said...

    Spartanrocky must get tired of being the only State fan in this thread capable of having a rational discussion.

    Upvotes to you.

    Ill talk rationally with you. What would you like to talk about today?

    signature image

    BrodieMSU

  • SpartanRocky said...

    It's a sliding scale between recruiting and coaching. Top recruiting + Top Coaching = NCs/dominant programs. Just having one or the other isn't enough to be a national power. MSU has some pretty good coaching, but the recruiting is not at the same level. That's why you have a program with 11 W seasons, but not BCS bowls.

    UM has always had top talent. Compare your roster this season to MSU's; I bet UM started at LEAST twice the 4/5-stars that MSU did. I think your coaching is good. I don't know if it's great.

    Notre Dame is probably the biggest fly in your ointment. Kelly came in as a more decorated coach as Hoke, and EVERYONE predicted instant success. He's actually out-recruited UM, and ND has more talent than any Big 10 program except tOSU, and they're equals.

    All of that has given him back to back 8-5 years. Charlie Weiss went to not 1, but 2 BCS bowls, brought in the #2 class nationally . . . and was gone 3 years later.

    Just continue winning and you won't have me arguing these points.

    That's because Kelly went to ND for himself. He's an ego-maniac who screams at his kids and is only out for himself.

    Hoke has always coveted the Michigan job and respects the position infinitely more than Kelly does. That's undeniable. Hoke is about Michigan, not about Hoke. You've heard him say it a million times. Kids will ALWAYS play harder for a guy like him who is genuine and devoted to the heritage of the program.

    I've coached for a long time and have always judged my success and the success of other coaches based on how hard the kids play for a coach. The Irish aren't playing for Kelly. They're playing out of fear of getting benched. Michigan improved so much on defense last year because the kids are 100% behind the staff and believe in them.

    signature image signature image signature image

    MSU isn't a very good football program.. takes year of consistent winning to get to that level. - copemoney 1/22/13

    Due51

  • Maize&Blue said...

    Well you have to understand as well that Michigan fans are not going to fear the Spartans until you get the second part of that equation as well.

    How can Michigan fans not fear MSU right now? We have won 4 straight games. What does it take? 1 more? 10 more?

    Are they just going to ignore the fact that MSU beats them and claim that MSU is just irrelevant?

    signature image

    BrodieMSU

  • SpartanRocky said...

    See my above example about ND.

    What I said was that I'll care about how you guys are recruiting once you start beating MSU. State beat tOSU, UM and UGA last season, all of which had at least twice the 4-star players that MSU had on their rosters. Why would any Spartan start bowing down to UM based on recruiting rankings?

    Hear the UM fans tell it, they're in for 10 straight Ws over MSU (Big M aside). I'll believe it when it starts happening, and not before. What's wrong with wanting your rival to prove it on the field first?

    Who anything about MSU having no chance against Michigan. Your post was out of the blue, sounded like you were letting off some steam from Michigan's great weekend.

    xxmgobluexx

  • BrodieMSU said...

    How can Michigan fans not fear MSU right now? We have won 4 straight games. What does it take? 1 more? 10 more?

    Are they just going to ignore the fact that MSU beats them and claim that MSU is just irrelevant?

    What is there to fear? Did you fear Michigan when they rolled off 6 straight against MSU?

    xxmgobluexx

  • Maize&Blue said...

    Well you have to understand as well that Michigan fans are not going to fear the Spartans until you get the second part of that equation as well.

    That's not rational thinking, bud. If you lose to a team once, let alone four consecutive times, then you should fear them a lot more than a fear based off of relatively arbitrary recruiting rankings.

    TerryLove

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    What is there to fear? Did you fear Michigan when they rolled off 6 straight against MSU?

    Well I didnt look forward to playing them with BW, thats for sure.

    signature image

    BrodieMSU

  • BrodieMSU said...

    How can Michigan fans not fear MSU right now? We have won 4 straight games. What does it take? 1 more? 10 more?

    Are they just going to ignore the fact that MSU beats them and claim that MSU is just irrelevant?

    You can't be serious.
    Fear? Do you think any Spartan feared Michigan after we rattled off 6 straight?
    Come on dude. Nobody fears anybody. Bring it down a notch.

    EDIT: didn't see virtually the same thing already posted. My bad.

    This post was edited by Due51 on 2/20/2012 at 3:58 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    MSU isn't a very good football program.. takes year of consistent winning to get to that level. - copemoney 1/22/13

    Due51

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Even if MSU wins in AA this year?

    Especially not this year. Hoke just signed his first real class. If MSU is beating UM in 2014, then I will worry. It takes a long time to dig out of a mess like the one left by Rich Rod, and Michigan still has a lack of talent at several key positions.

    FilthySanchez

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    What is there to fear? Did you fear Michigan when they rolled off 6 straight against MSU?

    In short, yes. I think fear is the wrong word, but for the sake of the argument, we probably did "fear" you then. Not so much, currently.

    TerryLove

  • TerryLove said...

    That's not rational thinking, bud. If you lose to a team once, let alone four consecutive times, then you should fear them a lot more than a fear based off of relatively arbitrary recruiting rankings.

    This makes zero sense. First of all, how many times does it have to be proved that recruiting rankings are not arbitrary. Second, everyone beat Michigan with Rich Rod. If he was still our coach and bringing in those types of players, I'd be afraid of losing to just about everyone.

    FilthySanchez