Online Now 3359

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1883
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3397
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

The Official Michigan, MSU, and 1 Random Guy from Arky Thread

  • MrWoodson said...

    Our game this week against NW will tell us a lot about whether this team is significantly better than last year's team or not. It certainly looks like our offense and defense are steadily improving with each game, but we need to play another good team or two to know whether the improvement is just a mirage (like last year) or real.

    While our offense has been somewhat less productive than last year, we also are not turning the ball over at anything close to the same rate. The drop off in turnovers has made a huge difference. Defensively, our worst game was against ND, which has a vastly improved running game from last year and one of the best WRs in the country in Michael Floyd. FWIW, even though Floyd got his catches against us, we managed to keep him out of the endzone. Probably the biggest surprise so far is that we were able to virtually shut down SDSU's offense. It might be that Hoke & Co. are so familiar with SDSU's personnel that we had an unfair advantage, but I don't think anyone expected us to be able to contain Ronnie Hillman the way we did while also pressuring SDSU's QB and disrupting their passing game. We held a SDSU team with a very good offense to just 7 points.

    NW's weakness is their defense (they simply don't have the personnel), but their offense is for real. If we can keep them in check (i.e., under 20 points), it will bode well for us going into the MSU game and the remainder of the season.

    I wasn't able to watch the SDSU game (wedding), but I see Hillman averaged a shade over 5 YPC and had just over 100 yards rushing. What's the story tehre?

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    A 3-4 front is a different animal than a blitzing 4-3. You honestly cannot compare the two. I'd say MSU has a problem against 3-4s, but to say that "Complex blitzing" from a 4-3 is going to confuse them remains to be seen. tOSU blitzed a bit, not much, but some, and got through on rushing downs; None of their blitzes on passing downs got home. Cousins was hit more against CMU than he was against tOSU (didn't give up a sack in either game though).

    Mattison's scheme right now reminds me a lot of Narduzzi's in 2009. DBs couldn't cover (for us), so he went blitz-heavy to try and make a positive play out of things. You can't rely on blitzing all year long; MSU has a full 2 weeks to look at all the blitzes you've dialed up thus far. I don't know how much your DBs have improved (serious question? How have they looked?), but I find the best Ds out there are the ones that blitz the fewest. It works well against inexperienced QBs (we used the blitz quite a bit against tOSU), but the more experienced ones will invite it.

    Wanna give Cunningham 1 on 1 coverage? Send a linebacker and give Sims free release off the line? Sounds good to me.

    We have actually not been blitzing very much the last couple of weeks. Like you said in your post about your special teams being a progression thing i feel the same about our D. It has gotten better and better each week. Our D line has played much better the last couple of games which allows Mattison to back off of blitzing some. I think our DB's have looked much better as the year has gone along. Fr Blake Countess looks to be the real deal, Floyd is playing pretty well. The biggest problem i am seeing is that Woolfolk is having a real hard time tackling. He isn't the best tackler anyway but with that big cast on his hand he can't tackle for anything right now.

    signature image signature image signature image

    WillyWolverine

  • sarcyspice said...

    as an MSU fan I actually think that the more interesting question isn't UM's RB vs MSU D-line and Rb's, but the other way round.... MSU's RB and O-line vs UM's defensive front 7.....

    so my question is... what have UM done differently other that going 4-3 from 3-3-5 to stop the run game? is the personel really that much different or are they just a year more experienced?? has the focus on the Run Defense affected the Pass defense at all?? because other that martin, I don't think there is a person on the UM "D" that overly scares me.. that isn't arrogence at all

    The biggest thing Michigan has done differently is coaching coaching and more coaching for the DL. They are teaching the kids fundamentals and getting leverage. Let's be honest last years D was soft. You don't get run on 30+ times in a row in a game and not be able to stop it without being soft. Hoke and Mattison preach toughness, leverage, gap responsibility. Last year's DL was mostly Martin making plays. This year we have seen plays made from Martin, Roh, Van Bergen, Black, Big Will.

    An example of our DL being tougher is our success on 3rd and short. We stopped ND at least 3 times in that game on 3rd and 1 when they tried running the ball. We had a goal line stand against Eastern. We have had a couple more 3rd and short stops the last couple of weeks. Last year every team could just line up on 3rd and short and push Michigan off the line and get the first down if not break the line completely and run for a TD.

    signature image signature image signature image

    WillyWolverine

  • SpartanRocky said...

    I wasn't able to watch the SDSU game (wedding), but I see Hillman averaged a shade over 5 YPC and had just over 100 yards rushing. What's the story tehre?

    Hillman is a really good running back. He is currently averaging 6.18 yards per carry and 151.5 yards per game so we actually held him under his averages. We also caused him to fumble i think 2 times in that game. Watching that game it was actually a very quiet 100 yard rushing game. Didn't really have an impact is what i mean by that.

    signature image signature image signature image

    WillyWolverine

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    The rb situation is just now becoming clear. It was a committee to start the season with Toussaint missing at least one of the games. He is breaking away from the pack with his recent performance on the field. Nice to see a rb in there to compliment Denard.

    I edited my last post about Toussaint also, fyi.

    IF you get tired and need to tag a partner, just let me know.... In the meantime you are doing a great job.

    SDWolverine

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Gotcha, and thanks for explaining your rotation. I admit that I've often thought about your RBs as a group, with no real feel for who was 1, 2, 3, etc.

    1,2,3 of RB rotation literally changes weakly (intentional pun) and mid game some weeks.

    SDWolverine

  • SpartanRocky said...

    A 3-4 front is a different animal than a blitzing 4-3. You honestly cannot compare the two. I'd say MSU has a problem against 3-4s, but to say that "Complex blitzing" from a 4-3 is going to confuse them remains to be seen. tOSU blitzed a bit, not much, but some, and got through on rushing downs; None of their blitzes on passing downs got home. Cousins was hit more against CMU than he was against tOSU (didn't give up a sack in either game though).

    Mattison's scheme right now reminds me a lot of Narduzzi's in 2009. DBs couldn't cover (for us), so he went blitz-heavy to try and make a positive play out of things. You can't rely on blitzing all year long; MSU has a full 2 weeks to look at all the blitzes you've dialed up thus far. I don't know how much your DBs have improved (serious question? How have they looked?), but I find the best Ds out there are the ones that blitz the fewest. It works well against inexperienced QBs (we used the blitz quite a bit against tOSU), but the more experienced ones will invite it.

    Wanna give Cunningham 1 on 1 coverage? Send a linebacker and give Sims free release off the line? Sounds good to me.

    "the best Ds out there are the ones that blitz the fewest" and then you admit MSU blitzed "quite a bit" versus OSU. It's best defensive performance of the year. Actually, MSU blitzed a TON against OSU (as the Buckeye center said, he never saw so many blitzes in his years at OSU).

    So, MSU's only "solid" win of the year came with an extremely high level of blitzing against a normally weak offense at OSU.

    Plus, you have not watched a lot of UM football. Mattison does not blitz a lot and the first game of the year (WMU) was blitz heavy. (That is a better Offense than OSU with a much more experienced QB). Michigan does not rely on the blitz, but they know how to use it. Plus, Mattison says he has a lot more blitz packages than he showed against WMU.

    Anyway, I agree you can't rely on blitzes to have a great defense, but you have to be able to do it when faced with a young QB or young OL. Michigan doesn't rely on it, but they can do it effectively.

    This post was edited by Peterklima on 10/5/2011 at 12:42 PM

    Peterklima

  • Peterklima said...

    "the best Ds out there are the ones that blitz the fewest" and then you admit MSU blitzed "quite a bit" versus OSU. It's best defensive performance of the year. Actually, MSU blitzed a TON against OSU (as the Buckeye center said, he never saw so many blitzes in his years at OSU).

    So, MSU's only "solid" win of the year came with an extremely high level of blitzing against a normally weak offense at OSU.

    Plus, you have not watched a lot of UM football. Mattison does not blitz a lot and the first game of the year (WMU) was blitz heavy. (That is a better Offense than MSU with a much more experienced QB). Michigan does not rely on the blitz, but they know how to use it. Plus, Mattison says he has a lot more blitz packages than he showed against WMU.

    Anyway, I agree you can't rely on blitzes to have a great defense, but you have to be able to do it when faced with a young QB or young OL. Michigan doesn't rely on it, but they can do it effectively.

    We blitzed because it was apparent that they couldn't bail themselves out by passing. Even blitzing 2 linebackers they weren't able to get any passes off.

    Macks

  • Macks said...

    We blitzed because it was apparent that they couldn't bail themselves out by passing. Even blitzing 2 linebackers they weren't able to get any passes off.

    And Michigan will do the same to take advantage of the confused OL at MSU?

    Peterklima

  • SpartanRocky said...

    I wasn't able to watch the SDSU game (wedding), but I see Hillman averaged a shade over 5 YPC and had just over 100 yards rushing. What's the story tehre?

    Ronnie Hillman is currently the 2nd leading rusher in the country. Prior to the Michigan game, he was averaging 166 ypg and 6.5 ypc. FWIW, he also was the 10th leading rusher in the country last year, averaging nearly 6 ypc, so his early stats this year are not a fluke. In comparison, we held Hillman to 109 yards rushing and 5.2 ypc. He also had 8 TDs in his first three games this season, while we held him to zero TDs. It is very difficult to totally shut down a RB like Hillman unless you devote all of your resources to that one goal and SDSU has far too good of a QB to do that. Hillman broke 100 yards against us, but it was his lowest production of the season, both in ypg and ypc, and we kept him out of the endzone. In fact, our redzone defense has been outstanding this year in all five games.

    This post has been edited 5 times, most recently by MrWoodson on 10/5/2011 at 12:38 PM

    Rushing - NCAA.com

    View the Official Rushing at NCAA.com

    www.ncaa.com

    MrWoodson

  • The WMU QB is more experienced than Cousins?

    OTPT

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    Bump for steve hyping and pumping in the wrong thread.

    What was going on over there buddy? I literally headed into the Michigan thread before I left the office to say good night to all of you guys, and I felt like the dad in American Pie walking in on his kid doing something embarrassing.

    For reference, Wiflong posted that a recruit narrowed his list down and it didn't included Michigan. So the posters were trying to figure out what they could do to entice him to come to Michigan, and one poster thought winning 14 games in a season would help. confused xxmgobluexx loved the idea.

    Biggest hype and pump fest I've seen this season. Still hyping, still pumping.

    This post was edited by steveschneider on 10/5/2011 at 12:44 PM

    signature image

    steveschneider

  • OTPT said...

    The WMU QB is more experienced than Cousins?

    Woops. I meant "OSU" not "MSU." I edited it.

    WMU has a better offense than OSU and a much more experienced QB than Braxton Miller. The point being that MSU's defense had to rely on the "all or nothing blitz" against a weaker opponent. It worked for them, but as Spartan Rocky says, "you can't rely on the blitz all year long.

    MSU's defense faced one good offense (ND) and lost. The next best Offense they faced (which was not very good) required them to blitz a LOT in order to pull out a victory.

    Peterklima

  • steveschneider said...

    Biggest hype and pump fest I've seen this season. Still hyping, still pumping.

    Shove it up your censored.

    signature image signature image

    Go Blue and Go Titans!

    CorchBlue

  • steveschneider said...

    What was going on over there buddy? I literally headed into the Michigan thread before I left the office to say good night to all of you guys, and I felt like the dad in American Pie walking in on his kid doing something embarrassing.

    For reference, Wiflong posted that a recruit narrowed his list down and it didn't included Michigan. So the posters were trying to figure out what they could do to entice him to come to Michigan, and one poster thought winning 14 games in a season would help. confused xxmgobluexx loved the idea.

    Biggest hype and pump fest I've seen this season. Still hyping, still pumping.

    I thought you were only here to talk football. Who do you think is the best first year head coach for a FBS team? Lmao, football only, bring the peace and harmony.

    xxmgobluexx

  • blue2468 said...

    Shove it up your censored.

    Keep hating.

    I'm impressed with everyone keeping it to football you only stop by when there's an opportunity to hate.

    signature image

    steveschneider

  • Peterklima said...

    Woops. I meant "OSU" not "MSU." I edited it.

    WMU has a better offense than OSU and a much more experienced QB than Braxton Miller. The point being that MSU's defense had to rely on the "all or nothing blitz" against a weaker opponent. It worked for them, but as Spartan Rocky says, "you can't rely on the blitz all year long.

    MSU's defense faced one good offense (ND) and lost. The next best Offense they faced (which was not very good) required them to blitz a LOT in order to pull out a victory.

    I think OSU will improve on their offense. Their QB was playing their second game. I don't think they'll be terrible for long and I thought he showed flashes of good things to come throughout the game.

    signature image

    steveschneider

  • steveschneider said...

    Keep hating.

    I'm impressed with everyone keeping it to football you only stop by when there's an opportunity to hate.

    All morning there has been civil football discussion and your first post in this thread all day wasn't about football. Either is your last one. Pot meet kettle.

    xxmgobluexx

  • MrWoodson said...

    Ronnie Hillman is currently the 2nd leading rusher in the country. Prior to the Michigan game, he was averaging 166 ypg and 6.5 ypc. FWIW, he also was the 10th leading rusher in the country last year, averaging nearly 6 ypc, so his early stats this year are not a fluke. In comparison, we held Hillman to 109 yards rushing and 5.2 ypc. He also had 8 TDs in his first three games this season, while we held him to zero TDs. It is very difficult to totally shut down a RB like Hillman unless you devote all of your resources to that one goal and SDSU has far too good of a QB to do that. Hillman broke 100 yards against us, but it was his lowest production of the season, both in ypg and ypc, and we kept him out of the endzone. In fact, our redzone defense has been outstanding this year in all five games.

    Reminds me of trying to hold a WR like Floyd to a quiet 80 yards and 0 touchdowns.

    bb011

  • bb011 said...

    Reminds me of trying to hold a WR like Floyd to a quiet 80 yards and 0 touchdowns.

    How did that turn out for the team as a whole? Must have gotten the win then.

    xxmgobluexx

  • steveschneider said...

    I think OSU will improve on their offense. Their QB was playing their second game. I don't think they'll be terrible for long and I thought he showed flashes of good things to come throughout the game.

    I disagree on this. I think they really miss Tressel's coaching. At this point I am really questioning Fickell and Co. ability to coach. Miller looks really lost at QB and with him enrolling early and spending all spring with the team he should have much more understanding off the offense than he does right now. Miller has shown the raw talent to play QB but it is really hard to bring along a freshman during the season who has shown that the game is just to fast for him at this time. The coaches need to spend the time during the week now going over game film and game planning for the next opponent.

    signature image signature image signature image

    WillyWolverine

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    All morning there has been civil football discussion and your first post in this thread all day wasn't about football. Either is your last one. Pot meet kettle.

    Whatever, I was just catching up and responding to your little flame from last night. Consider those three notes a palette cleanser....back to football.

    signature image

    steveschneider

  • Maize&Blue said...

    I disagree on this. I think they really miss Tressel's coaching. At this point I am really questioning Fickell and Co. ability to coach. Miller looks really lost at QB and with him enrolling early and spending all spring with the team he should have much more understanding off the offense than he does right now. Miller has shown the raw talent to play QB but it is really hard to bring along a freshman during the season who has shown that the game is just to fast for him at this time. The coaches need to spend the time during the week now going over game film and game planning for the next opponent.

    Tough for someone to look good in their second game though when they are constantly getting sacked.

    signature image

    steveschneider

  • steveschneider said...

    What was going on over there buddy? I literally headed into the Michigan thread before I left the office to say good night to all of you guys, and I felt like the dad in American Pie walking in on his kid doing something embarrassing.

    For reference, Wiflong posted that a recruit narrowed his list down and it didn't included Michigan. So the posters were trying to figure out what they could do to entice him to come to Michigan, and one poster thought winning 14 games in a season would help. confused xxmgobluexx loved the idea.

    Biggest hype and pump fest I've seen this season. Still hyping, still pumping.

    That was a different recruit. Work on your reading skills. Stefon Diggs named us to his top 10. Then someone asked about his teammate Wes Brown, and Steve put that article saying he didn't include Michigan in his list. Then we were talking about how we could get Diggs to come here, and someone said if we go 14-0 that would entice him to come here. What's wrong with saying that? That's a fact. If we go 14-0, he would probably come here if the coaches want him. That's not hyping and pumping, that's the truth..

    And you headed into the thread to say goodnight? No.. All you did was tell us how our team sucks and how we shouldn't be hyping our team. I have a question. Why are we not allowed to be excited about our team when we are 5-0 and our defense looks good for the first time in a while? Are we supposed to be down on our team and expect us to lose every game? That's what tRCMB does, so I know you're used to it, but most fans are optimistic about their team shrug

    signature image signature image signature image

    Ducksworth

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    How did that turn out for the team as a whole? Must have gotten the win then.

    How come someone can't do good in a loss? If you cover Michael Floyd well isn't that a positive?

    signature image

    steveschneider