Online Now 4196

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2696
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 4258
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

The Official Michigan, MSU, and 1 Random Guy from Arky Thread

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    Yep, the last 3 years, across the rivalry as a whole, not so much for sparty. Keep banking on coaching up those 2-3 stars.

    Last 3 classes:

    1 5 star

    17 4-stars

    9 2-stars

    MSU really hasn't taken a ton of 2-stars in recent years. MSU does take a lot of 3-stars, with a fair # of highly ranked guys, especially considering our perceived recruiting shortfalls.

    This year, we have 1 4-star and 4 3-stars according to 247, and 5 3-stars according to TOS. Are they elite prospects? No, though O'Connor and McGowan are pretty well respected talents. Are they 2-star MAC left-overs? Absolutely not. Can you win consistently with this type of recruiting? I think so, as long as the coaches are good.

    MSU doesn't have to outrecruit UM to hang with them. MSU just needs to stay in the overall ballpark. Unless Hoke and Co bring in 15+ 4-stars every class, I'm confident in MSU's 4-6 4 stars/class (average, last 3 years), along with a lot of 3-star guys. I don't consider those guys "reaches" or prospects that should have a hard time playing in the Big 10.

    I'm also not expecting MSU to measure up to the Bama's, Oklahoma's, and LSU's of the world until MSU recruits at that level. But Michigan? For the time being, MSU has the talent to handle the boys in blue.

    This post was edited by SpartanRocky on 6/13/2011 at 1:18 PM

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • BEdwards 17 said...

    Don't worry, they are going national. A 3* from Texas is always better than a 4* in Michigan.

    I know that was meant to be a flame, but I think Michigan fans will be surprised at our out of state haul this year. I'm not saying we are going to get bunch of highly recruited 4 star guys, but I think we will get lots of solid 3 star guys. Teams like Wisconsin have made a living on getting solid 3 star prospects from around the country and building up a strong roster with kids like that.

    spartanstate

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    Yep, the last 3 years, across the rivalry as a whole, not so much for sparty. Keep banking on coaching up those 2-3 stars.

    Keep Hope alive!

    NigelUno

  • Who is visiting that we don't know of. I don't know if you heard about us but Greg Garmon, Jordan Diamond, and Andrus Peat are visiting our campus this week and the beginning of next. Last week Erik magnuson, Tom Strobel, Jarod Wilson, and Maty Mauk were all on campus. These are just a few not to mention our name is being mentioned in the same sentence as Gunner Kiel. How are you close to us in the type of talent that visits or is being recruited by Michigan.

    MichLash30

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Last 3 classes:

    1 5 star

    17 4-stars

    9 2-stars

    MSU really hasn't taken a ton of 2-stars in recent years. MSU does take a lot of 3-stars, with a fair # of highly ranked guys, especially considering our perceived recruiting shortfalls.

    This year, we have 1 4-star and 4 3-stars according to 247, and 5 3-stars according to TOS. Are they elite prospects? No, though O'Connor and McGowan are pretty well respected talents. Are they 2-star MAC left-overs? Absolutely not. Can you win consistently with this type of recruiting? I think so, as long as the coaches are good.

    MSU doesn't have to outrecruit UM to hang with them. MSU just needs to stay in the overall ballpark. Unless Hoke and Co bring in 15+ 4-stars every class, I'm confident in MSU's 4-6 4 stars/class (average, last 3 years), along with a lot of 3-star guys. I don't consider those guys "reaches" or prospects that should have a hard time playing in the Big 10.

    I'm also not expecting MSU to measure up to the Bama's, Oklahoma's, and LSU's of the world until MSU recruits at that level. But Michigan? For the time being, MSU has the talent to handle the boys in blue.

    These next few years are vital to MSU. Michigan is wounded and if MSU ever has a chance to turn the tide of recruiting it is now. If Michigan recovers this year (and I think they will) then the recruiting will continue to the point where Michigan is recruiting on the level of Bama, Oklaoma, and LSU. You said it yourself, MSU can't compete against a team with talent like that, 67-31-5 kind of talent.

    xxmgobluexx

  • NigelUno said...

    Keep Hope alive!

    In Hoke we trust.

    lol

    xxmgobluexx

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    These next few years are vital to MSU. Michigan is wounded and if MSU ever has a chance to turn the tide of recruiting it is now. If Michigan recovers this year (and I think they will) then the recruiting will continue to the point where Michigan is recruiting on the level of Bama, Oklaoma, and LSU. You said it yourself, MSU can't compete against a team with talent like that, 67-31-5 kind of talent.

    MIchigan is recruiting well, but you guys are not on Bama, LSU, OK, FSU's level. That takes multiple 5-stars, and double digit 4-stars in a class. Right now MSU has as many 5-stars on its roster (1, Will Gholston) as UM does (1, Will Campbell).

    I've said that MSU needs 4-6 4-star guys per class; whatever makes up 25% of that year's class should be that high-end HS talent. MSU isn't ready to hit that 8+ 4-star/years level, we need to have a few more winning seasons to get there. That 4-6 4-star range will let MSU win 7+ games/year and build a reputation of playing winning football.

    Teams that haven't been powers since Nixon are going to have to walk before they can run. MSU has graduated from crawling to walking. We'll see over the next 2-3 seasons whether we're ready to jog.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    MSU doesn't have to outrecruit UM to hang with them. MSU just needs to stay in the overall ballpark. Unless Hoke and Co bring in 15+ 4-stars every class, I'm confident in MSU's 4-6 4 stars/class (average, last 3 years), along with a lot of 3-star guys. I don't consider those guys "reaches" or prospects that should have a hard time playing in the Big 10.

    I'm also not expecting MSU to measure up to the Bama's, Oklahoma's, and LSU's of the world until MSU recruits at that level. But Michigan? For the time being, MSU has the talent to handle the boys in blue.

    Here is the part that NONE of you seem to understand. Yes , Michigan will always have a better recruiting class. MSU fan says it doesn't matter because UofM has always had a better recruiting class and we still beat them the last 3 years. These are facts and they are indisputable.

    Michigan had better classes because Rich Rod abandoned the Midwest for the most part. Unless you were a diehard UofM fan you were not going to get overly recruited and if you did, RR had screwed up most high school coach relationships in the state of Michigan that it was very difficult to get a local kid.

    Enter Dantonio with his stance on taking the state and getting into the local high schools to build relationships that were blown up by John L and crew. Of course he racks up local talent and takes advantage of the overhaul in Ann Arbor. He did a good job. He did what he was suppose to do.

    Fast Forward to the present and Michigan is once again winning the recruiting battle. Only this time they are taking the players that MSU wanted. They have gone head to head on many players this year and have lost to Michigan. Before you say Cass Tech and Ross were predestined to go to Ann Arbor, those recruits had already said if RR was still there they go elsewhere. MSU had a chance to go in there and win some of those kids. They did not. You have now lost the state and your feeding ground for high school talent that was going to help you sustain your recent 1 year success. If you can't get any of the top 10 talent after you just won the Big 10 championship, i don't know when you will.

    signature image signature image signature image

    RicoX19

  • SpartanRocky said...

    MIchigan is recruiting well, but you guys are not on Bama, LSU, OK, FSU's level. That takes multiple 5-stars, and double digit 4-stars in a class. Right now MSU has as many 5-stars on its roster (1, Will Gholston) as UM does (1, Will Campbell).

    I've said that MSU needs 4-6 4-star guys per class; whatever makes up 25% of that year's class should be that high-end HS talent. MSU isn't ready to hit that 8+ 4-star/years level, we need to have a few more winning seasons to get there. That 4-6 4-star range will let MSU win 7+ games/year and build a reputation of playing winning football.

    Teams that haven't been powers since Nixon are going to have to walk before they can run. MSU has graduated from crawling to walking. We'll see over the next 2-3 seasons whether we're ready to jog.

    Michigan has historically been at that level, hence the 67-31-5. That is why this year and the next couple are absolutely crucial to MSU. If they fall back and Michigan rises back up (which they will), then MSU is back to being an also ran.

    Edit: Meeechigan explained the importance of Michigan reastablishing the pecking order in Michigan very well. If MSU is playing second fiddle in their home state, then you know that with national recruits they are even less than that.

    This post was edited by xxmgobluexx on 6/13/2011 at 2:28 PM

    xxmgobluexx

  • MichLash30 said...

    Who is visiting that we don't know of. I don't know if you heard about us but Greg Garmon, Jordan Diamond, and Andrus Peat are visiting our campus this week and the beginning of next. Last week Erik magnuson, Tom Strobel, Jarod Wilson, and Maty Mauk were all on campus. These are just a few not to mention our name is being mentioned in the same sentence as Gunner Kiel. How are you close to us in the type of talent that visits or is being recruited by Michigan.

    Our headline visitor was Nick Tompkins from GA. Not on the same level as Garmon or others you mentioned, but should be a solid 3 star when he gets ranked.

    spartanstate

  • Diamond is visiting MSU this week as well, as is Dennis Norfleet. Oh, and now Hoke has offered Radcliff, the RB out of FL that MSU offered weeks ago. Should be fun to see how these shake out.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • Meeechigan said...

    Here is the part that NONE of you seem to understand. Yes , Michigan will always have a better recruiting class. MSU fan says it doesn't matter because UofM has always had a better recruiting class and we still beat them the last 3 years. These are facts and they are indisputable.

    Michigan had better classes because Rich Rod abandoned the Midwest for the most part. Unless you were a diehard UofM fan you were not going to get overly recruited and if you did, RR had screwed up most high school coach relationships in the state of Michigan that it was very difficult to get a local kid.

    Enter Dantonio with his stance on taking the state and getting into the local high schools to build relationships that were blown up by John L and crew. Of course he racks up local talent and takes advantage of the overhaul in Ann Arbor. He did a good job. He did what he was suppose to do.

    Fast Forward to the present and Michigan is once again winning the recruiting battle. Only this time they are taking the players that MSU wanted. They have gone head to head on many players this year and have lost to Michigan. Before you say Cass Tech and Ross were predestined to go to Ann Arbor, those recruits had already said if RR was still there they go elsewhere. MSU had a chance to go in there and win some of those kids. They did not. You have now lost the state and your feeding ground for high school talent that was going to help you sustain your recent 1 year success. If you can't get any of the top 10 talent after you just won the Big 10 championship, i don't know when you will.

    Uhhh, I understand all this. What you don't understand is that the recruiting cycle is far from over. Will you keep the same tune if Burbridge, O'Brien and Norfleet all come to MSU?

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • Let's have another fun list-game. Name your Top 10 players in the Big 10, regardless of position.

    As this list is for the whole year, I've omitted the OSU players who are suspended for the first 5 games. Because multiple proven players for tOSU could be suspended, including 4/7 of their projected front 7, I have a hard time putting many of them on the list. Kind of weird, but I don't feel any WR is truly a top 10 player in the conference. The best are probably Roundtree (Mich), Toon (Wisky), Cunningham (MSU), Posey (tOSU and probably the best, but not listed for suspension reasons), McNutt (Iowa), Doss (IU), Ebert (Northwestern).

    1. Jared Crick, DT, Nebraska
    2. James White, RB, Wisconsin
    3. LaVonte David, LB, Nebraska
    4. Dan Persa, QB, Northwestern
    5. Mike Brewster, C, tOSU
    6. Dennard Robinson, QB, Michigan
    7. Mike Mauti, LB, PSU
    8. Jerel Worthy, DT, MSU
    9. Kirk Cousins, QB, MSU
    10. Edwin Baker, RB, MSU

    I know the last 3 make me sound like a homer, but all 3 will contend for all league honors at their positions. Let's get this rolling.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Uhhh, I understand all this. What you don't understand is that the recruiting cycle is far from over. Will you keep the same tune if Burbridge, O'Brien and Norfleet all come to MSU?

    Burbridge needs to qualify before I think anything about him. I think O'Brien is a very good player and will be a nice addition to anyone. I'm not sold on Norfleet...don't see him as having a lot of success in the Big Ten.

    c_woodson

  • c_woodson said...

    Burbridge needs to qualify before I think anything about him. I think O'Brien is a very good player and will be a nice addition to anyone. I'm not sold on Norfleet...don't see him as having a lot of success in the Big Ten.

    I see Norfleet as a utility player; KR/PR/ 3rd down take a swing pass the distance type.

    MSU does need a between-the-tackles guy in this class, which is why we offered Radcliff and Mahone (I think Mahone goes to PSU though).

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    I see Norfleet as a utility player; KR/PR/ 3rd down take a swing pass the distance type.

    MSU does need a between-the-tackles guy in this class, which is why we offered Radcliff and Mahone (I think Mahone goes to PSU though).

    Norfleet may be that, but that is not the type of guy I would pound my recruiting chest over. The other two I'd be much more excited about.

    I'm not familiar with Radcliff. I didn't even know Michigan offered. I'll have to check him out.

    c_woodson

  • c_woodson said...

    Norfleet may be that, but that is not the type of guy I would pound my recruiting chest over. The other two I'd be much more excited about.

    I'm not familiar with Radcliff. I didn't even know Michigan offered. I'll have to check him out.

    Looks like he's blowing up; Georgia and Miami(Fl) also offered. Edit: I'm talking about Radcliff.

    In terms of Norfleet, he's a 4-star prospect as ranked by this site. I'm not going to use his commitment as the basis for predicting 4 straight conf. titles, but if MSU ends up with 2-3 in-state 4-stars, it would certainly blunt the notion that Hoke has turned the whole state blue in a few months.

    This post was edited by SpartanRocky on 6/13/2011 at 3:28 PM

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • c_woodson said...

    Norfleet may be that, but that is not the type of guy I would pound my recruiting chest over. The other two I'd be much more excited about.

    I'm not familiar with Radcliff. I didn't even know Michigan offered. I'll have to check him out.

    According to mgoblog, he does not have an offer. Also Michigan is not one of the teams listed on any of the recruiting sites.

    Edit: Did some extra searching, and I think he does have an offer. From what I read though, most people believe he is going to stay in the south or Louisville.

    This post was edited by BEdwards 17 on 6/13/2011 at 3:35 PM

    BEdwards 17

  • I would love to have O'Brien but at the expense of Ondre and Shittu...I guess they will wait and see. NT is huge this class. I'd hate to lose out on all 3 of them. If MSU can get O'Brien and JJ that would be just as good as Pipkens and Shittu.

    signature image signature image signature image

    RicoX19

  • Nor fleet will go out of state to Tenn or the hot flavor of the month.

    signature image signature image signature image

    RicoX19

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Let's have another fun list-game. Name your Top 10 players in the Big 10, regardless of position.

    As this list is for the whole year, I've omitted the OSU players who are suspended for the first 5 games. Because multiple proven players for tOSU could be suspended, including 4/7 of their projected front 7, I have a hard time putting many of them on the list. Kind of weird, but I don't feel any WR is truly a top 10 player in the conference. The best are probably Roundtree (Mich), Toon (Wisky), Cunningham (MSU), Posey (tOSU and probably the best, but not listed for suspension reasons), McNutt (Iowa), Doss (IU), Ebert (Northwestern).

    1. Jared Crick, DT, Nebraska 2. James White, RB, Wisconsin 3. LaVonte David, LB, Nebraska 4. Dan Persa, QB, Northwestern 5. Mike Brewster, C, tOSU 6. Dennard Robinson, QB, Michigan 7. Mike Mauti, LB, PSU 8. Jerel Worthy, DT, MSU 9. Kirk Cousins, QB, MSU 10. Edwin Baker, RB, MSU

    I know the last 3 make me sound like a homer, but all 3 will contend for all league honors at their positions. Let's get this rolling.

    Mike Martin gets a homer Nod at the DT postion

    signature image signature image signature image

    RicoX19

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Let's have another fun list-game. Name your Top 10 players in the Big 10, regardless of position.

    As this list is for the whole year, I've omitted the OSU players who are suspended for the first 5 games. Because multiple proven players for tOSU could be suspended, including 4/7 of their projected front 7, I have a hard time putting many of them on the list. Kind of weird, but I don't feel any WR is truly a top 10 player in the conference. The best are probably Roundtree (Mich), Toon (Wisky), Cunningham (MSU), Posey (tOSU and probably the best, but not listed for suspension reasons), McNutt (Iowa), Doss (IU), Ebert (Northwestern).

    1. Jared Crick, DT, Nebraska
    2. James White, RB, Wisconsin
    3. LaVonte David, LB, Nebraska
    4. Dan Persa, QB, Northwestern
    5. Mike Brewster, C, tOSU
    6. Dennard Robinson, QB, Michigan
    7. Mike Mauti, LB, PSU
    8. Jerel Worthy, DT, MSU
    9. Kirk Cousins, QB, MSU
    10. Edwin Baker, RB, MSU

    I know the last 3 make me sound like a homer, but all 3 will contend for all league honors at their positions. Let's get this rolling.

    You could easily put Mike Martin instead of Worthy and Molk instead of Brewster. Baker has to be there though, he is a stud.

    xxmgobluexx

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    Michigan has historically been at that level, hence the 67-31-5. That is why this year and the next couple are absolutely crucial to MSU. If they fall back and Michigan rises back up (which they will), then MSU is back to being an also ran.

    Edit: Meeechigan explained the importance of Michigan reastablishing the pecking order in Michigan very well. If MSU is playing second fiddle in their home state, then you know that with national recruits they are even less than that.

    Oh my god, the arrogance is f'ing unbelievable. Give me your FACTS that Michigan will rise back up.

    Sp4rt4ns

  • NigelUno said...

    Seems to have worked the last 3 years against RichRod.

    Fixed it for you.

    signature image signature image signature image

    MSU isn't a very good football program.. takes year of consistent winning to get to that level. - copemoney 1/22/13

    Due51

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    You could easily put Mike Martin instead of Worthy and Molk instead of Brewster. Baker has to be there though, he is a stud.

    Yea, I was asked to move this in from the other thread, because the Seminole fan hijacked it. I saw your response in there.

    I really think Martin is a notch below Worthy for now, though I want to see him play back in the 4-3. MM is really a 3-tech guy rather than a NT.

    I think Molk and Brewster are both great Cs, but hey, it's my list so forgive me if I leave a Wolverine off of it lol

    I believe Cousins should be on there; as a 5th year SR with 2 full years starting behind him, he's the best pocket-passer in the league.

    I don't think there's a true stud DB aside from maybe Dennard from Neb and Hyde for Iowa, but Hyde's moving to S, so who knows what effect that'll have. No stud DEs in the league after we lost a bunch in Kerrigan, Watt, Clayborn and Heyward.

    This post was edited by SpartanRocky on 6/13/2011 at 3:49 PM

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky