Online Now 3259

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2027
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3199
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

The Official Michigan, MSU, and 1 Random Guy from Arky Thread

  • Macks said...

    Answer me honestly. Is Cam Gordon good at LB? He basically got trucked by all 3 of our RBs last year and the commentators mentioned his name a lot, and not in a good way. He played SS last year, correct?

    He played safety as a true freshman but moved to "star" "spurr" "whatever" backer last year, and in my opinion, no he's not good. If I remember, he was primarily a receiver in hs.

    But more to the point, I chide SR about State's LBs because leading up to the season, he claimed they would get about 90% of last years production from this years group. Just to clarify, he didn't think there would be a significant drop off despite replacing 4 year starters Gordon and 2-time AA Jones.

    You can spew out all the tackle stats you want, Bullough can't carry Gordons jock. He may be on a lot of tackles but they aren't at the LOS, a la Jones/Gordon.

    signature image signature image signature image

    MSU isn't a very good football program.. takes year of consistent winning to get to that level. - copemoney 1/22/13

    Due51

  • Due51 said...

    oh Rocky, you have all the answers.

    Nevermind me. You're right on all accounts. Your OL will be fine. Your DBs are flawless. And if I didn't know better, I'd swear that was Jones and Gordon at LB. :lol:

    Oh come off it. I didn't say the DBs were flawless, or that our OL will be awesome. I think both will be enough to beat Michigan this year though, which is what we're talking about.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • Due51 said...

    He played safety as a true freshman but moved to "star" "spurr" "whatever" backer last year, and in my opinion, no he's not good. If I remember, he was primarily a receiver in hs.

    But more to the point, I chide SR about State's LBs because leading up to the season, he claimed they would get about 90% of last years production from this years group. Just to clarify, he didn't think there would be a significant drop off despite replacing 4 year starters Gordon and 2-time AA Jones.

    You can spew out all the tackle stats you want, Bullough can't carry Gordons jock. He may be on a lot of tackles but they aren't at the LOS, a la Jones/Gordon.

    Right now you're right about the LBs. 3 games in and it looks like you are right. BTW, Bullough is at Jones' position and Denicos Allen is at Gordon's. Allen actually leads the team in TFL . . . .

    Care to defend Robinson's passing this year while you're at it?

    This post was edited by SpartanRocky on 9/21/2011 at 4:21 PM

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • Due51 said...

    Amazing what playing an FAU and YSU, along with defending against team nursing a 2TD lead will do for your defensive statistics.

    Let's face it, State's patch OLine made up of converted kickers and punters will be able to keep Michigan's DL at bay, thanks in part to the magical bye week prior to the game.

    Amazing what beating teams like UMASS, UCONN, Bowling Green and Indiana did to make your QB a September Heisman winner last year. lol

    signature image

    steveschneider

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Right now you're right about the LBs. 3 games in and it looks like you are right. BTW, Bullough is at Jones' position and Denicos Allen is at Gordon's. Allen actually leads the team in TFL . . . .

    Care to defend Robinson's passing this year while you're at it?

    No. Not at all. He's not good at sitting back and reading a D. He can sling a quick pass just fine (see the Koger and Dileo TDs last week).

    But to be clear, I'm not the one making any claims or predictions based on games against 2 deadbeats and an ass whooping on the road.

    signature image signature image signature image

    MSU isn't a very good football program.. takes year of consistent winning to get to that level. - copemoney 1/22/13

    Due51

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Oh come off it. I didn't say the DBs were flawless, or that our OL will be awesome. I think both will be enough to beat Michigan this year though, which is what we're talking about.

    You "think" it will be enough...

    signature image

    Do infants have as much fun in infancy as adults do in adultery?

    AnthonyBourdain

  • steveschneider said...

    Amazing what beating teams like UMASS, UCONN, Bowling Green and Indiana did to make your QB a September Heisman winner last year. lol

    Well, if you can find a single claim by me using statistics from the first 3 games to predict the outcome of the M v S game, feel free. But the fact is, I made none about Robinson, our DL, our Lbs, or anyone. You'll find all such claims attributed to your boy SpartanRocky.

    signature image signature image signature image

    MSU isn't a very good football program.. takes year of consistent winning to get to that level. - copemoney 1/22/13

    Due51

  • steveschneider said...

    Amazing what beating teams like UMASS, UCONN, Bowling Green and Indiana did to make your QB a September Heisman winner last year. lol

    UConn won the Big East last year and went to a BCS bowl game, so they weren't a cupcake like the other games you listed.

    signature image signature image

    Go Blue and Go Titans!

    CorchBlue

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Oh come off it. I didn't say the DBs were flawless, or that our OL will be awesome. I think both will be enough to beat Michigan this year though, which is what we're talking about.

    Which is what we heard about the ND game as well.

    signature image signature image

    Go Blue and Go Titans!

    CorchBlue

  • Due51 said...

    Well, if you can find a single claim by me using statistics from the first 3 games to predict the outcome of the M v S game, feel free. But the fact is, I made none about Robinson, our DL, our Lbs, or anyone. You'll find all such claims attributed to your boy SpartanRocky.

    Relax man, I was explicitly asked by xxmgobluexx what I thought of the MSU - UM match-up based off of the first 3 games. I didn't just put a post that said "3 GAMES IN, MSU iS GONNA WIN WHOO HOOO"

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • AnthonyBourdain said...

    You "think" it will be enough...

    And you may "think" it won't be. All we can do at this point is "think"; no one is psychic, so no one knows how it'll actually play out. I was asked my opinion, so I gave it. I didn't say it was gospel.

    Michigan State does not and will not run the 3-4 defense.

    SpartanRocky

  • SpartanRocky said...

    And you may "think" it won't be. All we can do at this point is "think"; no one is psychic, so no one knows how it'll actually play out. I was asked my opinion, so I gave it. I didn't say it was gospel.

    I am psychic, and I know how it plays out.

    But I won't tell....

    signature image signature image

    Go Blue and Go Titans!

    CorchBlue

  • Due51 said...

    Well, if you can find a single claim by me using statistics from the first 3 games to predict the outcome of the M v S game, feel free. But the fact is, I made none about Robinson, our DL, our Lbs, or anyone. You'll find all such claims attributed to your boy SpartanRocky.

    He's been right the last three years by using stats to predict victories over UofM. Maybe he's onto something? biggrin

    signature image

    steveschneider

  • SpartanRocky said...

    "3 GAMES IN, MSU iS GONNA WIN WHOO HOOO"

    I support this post

    signature image signature image signature image

    Snake Plissken

  • Due51 is -1 bombing. The guy is seething with anger. roflmao

    This post was edited by steveschneider on 9/21/2011 at 5:22 PM

    signature image

    steveschneider

  • SpartanRocky said...

    And you may "think" it won't be. All we can do at this point is "think"; no one is psychic, so no one knows how it'll actually play out. I was asked my opinion, so I gave it. I didn't say it was gospel.

    Correct with all the data you amassed all you can do is guess.

    signature image

    Do infants have as much fun in infancy as adults do in adultery?

    AnthonyBourdain

  • How do you sparty guys think your rival game with CMU will turn out? The battle for 127 has been a hottly contested one the last 20 years, 4-3 in spartys favor.

    xxmgobluexx

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    How do you sparty guys think your rival game with CMU will turn out? The battle for 127 has been a hottly contested one the last 20 years, 4-3 in spartys favor.

    Your posts are comical, so much rage inside.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Now knowing what 1995 is like all over again! Thank you 247 technology!!

    InTenSity

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Relax man, I was explicitly asked by xxmgobluexx what I thought of the MSU - UM match-up based off of the first 3 games. I didn't just put a post that said "3 GAMES IN, MSU iS GONNA WIN WHOO HOOO"

    Actually you were asked if you were still so sure that MSU will win. Your answers and citations to anecdotes clearly imply that you are still as confident. Any objective observer would say the chances of an MSU win has decreased based on UM outperforming expectations and MSU underperforming as the 15th ranked team. Only a delusional homer would not admit the obvious.

    Peterklima

  • steveschneider said...

    Amazing what beating teams like UMASS, UCONN, Bowling Green and Indiana did to make your QB a September Heisman winner last year. lol

    Hey now, that UCONN team was a BCS team.

    roflmao

    signature image signature image signature image

    um_king

  • steveschneider said...

    Due51 is -1 bombing. The guy is seething with anger. roflmao

    I'm on my blackberry and it's been in the car, charging since my last post.

    I didn't neg anyone. More stats that don't support the truth. :lol:

    This post was edited by Due51 on 9/21/2011 at 6:26 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    MSU isn't a very good football program.. takes year of consistent winning to get to that level. - copemoney 1/22/13

    Due51

  • um_king said...

    Hey now, that UCONN team was a BCS team.

    roflmao

    roflmao I actually watched that game, who was the LB on your team that caused the fumble? That was a huge play. Who ever is negative bombing me step forth. Don't hide behind your computer, man up and let me know who you are.

    signature image

    steveschneider

  • Due51 said...

    I'm on my blackberry and it's been in the car, charging since my last post.

    I didn't neg anyone. More stats that don't support the truth. :lol:

    Don't text and drive. cyclops

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by steveschneider on 9/21/2011 at 6:45 PM

    signature image

    steveschneider

  • steveschneider said...

    Come on be a 'Michigan Man' and man up to it. You can tell me. Was that you negative bombing me?

    I'm tellin you I didn't neg you. God's (an Bo's) honest truth.

    signature image signature image signature image

    MSU isn't a very good football program.. takes year of consistent winning to get to that level. - copemoney 1/22/13

    Due51

  • Due51 said...

    I'm tellin you I didn't neg you. God's (an Bo's) honest truth.

    Alright, I trust you. I'm just trying to suss out the coward. Just +1 you.

    edit: whoops, out of +1's will hit you up later.

    This post was edited by steveschneider on 9/21/2011 at 6:46 PM

    signature image

    steveschneider