Online Now 3730

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2223
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3563
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

USC Implosion Timeline

  • getmyjive11 said...

    Hey, we beat a top 25 team and a BCS bowl team this year. USC cannot claim the same can they? We also had more wins with only 67scholarship players and one less game to do it in. shrug

    We aren't allowed to talk about Penn State for 4 years.

    Oneluve4u

  • Oneluve4u said...

    We aren't allowed to talk about Penn State for 4 years.

    I guess BOB should give back those coach of the year trophies, eh? I had no idea that they could give those to programs that we "aren't allowed to talk about".

    But none of that matters... you didn't dispute what I said because there is no disputing it. USC stank.

    getmyjive11 ●

  • scinsc5 said...

    i thought ramsey decomitted on 2/6(signing day)

    Not according to his profile on this site. Also I believe Ramsey committed to FSU the day prior to NSD.

    signature image signature image

    Clarkw267 ●

  • getmyjive11 said...

    But none of that matters...

    After PSu lost to the Ohio Bobcats and Virginia, it was obvious that the only reason the Nittany Ligers
    had a winning season was because they played other awful teams in the awful Big Ten.

    This post was edited by NcaaAssassinG13 on 2/9/2013 at 12:11 AM

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • getmyjive11 said...

    Hey, we beat a top 25 team and a BCS bowl team this year. USC cannot claim the same can they? We also had more wins with only 67scholarship players and one less game to do it in. shrug

    Lmao

    Alonzo Harris

  • Kiffen just screwed another kid.

    USC just fired Ty Isaac's primary recruiter, offensive coordinator/RB coach Kennedy Polamalu.

    Michmania ●

  • Michmania said...

    Kiffen just screwed another kid.

    USC just fired Ty Isaac's primary recruiter, offensive coordinator/RB coach Kennedy Polamalu.

    Should have listened to his parents.lol Don't know how parents can be so oblivious to what was transpiring at USC?confused

    signature image

    star69

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    After PSu lost to the Ohio Bobcats and Virginia, it was obvious that the only reason the Nittany Ligers had a winning season was because they played other awful teams in the awful Big Ten.

    So you are saying that losses mean more than wins? Is that right?

    getmyjive11 ●

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    After PSu lost to the Ohio Bobcats and Virginia, it was obvious that the only reason the Nittany Ligers had a winning season was because they played other awful teams in the awful Big Ten.

    Georgia Tech?

    signature image signature image

    Clarkw267 ●

  • Clarkw267 said...

    Georgia Tech?

    Yes losing to a MAC team and the 10th place ACC team is much worse than losing to the 3rd place ACC team.

    Are you really trying argue that it isn't?

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Yes losing to a MAC team and the 10th place ACC team is much worse than losing to the 3rd place ACC team.

    Are you really trying argue that it isn't?

    The difference is, they actually beat teams that were worth a damn. After going through a mass exodus of players that included their best offensive weapon , who played for you this year.

    You guys are a mess. Get your act together then come back and talk.

    signature image signature image

    Clarkw267 ●

  • getmyjive11 said...

    So you are saying that losses mean more than wins? Is that right?

    It flip flops based on what SEC team you are and which argument gets you in the BCS title game. In 2011 it did, but in 2012 it didn't.

    See Alabama 2011 ( LSU was a better loss and trumps Ok State who had more Quality wins)

    See Alabama 2012 ( Alabama had more quality wins and that trumps Oregon, who was undefeated in regulation and had the better loss).

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • Clarkw267 said...

    The difference is, they actually beat teams that were worth a damn. After going through a mass exodus of players that included their best offensive weapon , who played for you this year.

    You guys are a mess. Get your act together then come back and talk.

    Teams such as...?

    USC_Forever

  • Clarkw267 said...

    The difference is, they actually beat teams that were worth a damn. After going through a mass exodus of players that included their best offensive weapon , who played for you this year.

    You guys are a mess. Get your act together then come back and talk.

    Which teams were worth a damn, Wisconsin? You mean the team with the same amount of losses as USC. Let's face it, the only B10 team that would have finished ahead of USC if they were in the Pac12 last year, is maybe Ohio St.

    This post was edited by NcaaAssassinG13 on 2/9/2013 at 4:03 PM

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • USC_Forever said...

    Teams such as...?

    Top 25 NW and Rose Bowl Wisky. They weren't great, but were better than any win USC had (easily)

    getmyjive11 ●

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Which teams were worth a damn, Wisconsin? You mean the team with the same amount of losses as USC. Let's face it, the only B10 team that would have finished ahead of USC if they were in the Pac12 last year, is maybe Ohio St.

    lol

    And you base that on what?

    getmyjive11 ●

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    It flip flops based on what SEC team you are and which argument gets you in the BCS title game. In 2011 it did, but in 2012 it didn't.

    See Alabama 2011 ( LSU was a better loss and trumps Ok State who had more Quality wins)

    See Alabama 2012 ( Alabama had more quality wins and that trumps Oregon, who was undefeated in regulation and had the better loss).

    in reality Bama was simply a better team than both.

    w/ a four team scenario...
    in 2011 Okie Lite would have had their trousers pushed in.
    in 2012 atleast Oregon may have made it out of Rnd1.

    as for a USC implosion ? highly unlikely with their recruiting base.

    Crimson_Ghost

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    It flip flops based on what SEC team you are and which argument gets you in the BCS title game. In 2011 it did, but in 2012 it didn't.

    See Alabama 2011 ( LSU was a better loss and trumps Ok State who had more Quality wins)

    See Alabama 2012 ( Alabama had more quality wins and that trumps Oregon, who was undefeated in regulation and had the better loss).

    lol

    You jelly.

    signature image signature image signature image

    sf2k4 ●

  • getmyjive11 said...

    lol

    And you base that on what?

    Based on the fact that Ucla beat Nebraska, Oregon St and Stanford beat Wisconsin, Cal nearly beat Ohio St at the horseshoe and then got annihilated in Pac 12 play. Also, SC gave Stanford the same game 21-14 / 20-14 that Wisconsin did but SC played @ Stanford.

    I could see Ohio St finishing just ahead of Washington for 7th in the Pac12 last year and Michigan and Penn St battling Arizona St for 8th.

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Based on the fact that Ucla beat Nebraska, Oregon St and Stanford beat Wisconsin, Cal nearly beat Ohio St at the horseshoe and then got annihilated in Pac 12 play. Also, SC gave Stanford the same game 21-14 / 20-14 that Wisconsin did but SC played @ Stanford.

    I could see Ohio St finishing just ahead of Washington for 7th in the Pac12 last year and Michigan and Penn St battling Arizona St for 8th.

    You really believe the PAC is good, don't you?

    signature image signature image signature image

    sf2k4 ●

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Based on the fact that Ucla beat Nebraska, Oregon St and Stanford beat Wisconsin, Cal nearly beat Ohio St at the horseshoe and then got annihilated in Pac 12 play. Also, SC gave Stanford the same game 21-14 / 20-14 that Wisconsin did but SC played @ Stanford.

    I could see Ohio St finishing just ahead of Washington for 7th in the Pac12 last year and Michigan and Penn St battling Arizona St for 8th.

    lol

    You're funny.

    signature image signature image

    Clarkw267 ●

  • sf2k4 said...

    You really believe the PAC is good, don't you?

    Well, they don't have the best record in games between winning AQ teams in the BCS era for nothing, including 10-6 vs the SEC.

    This past year though, I would put them as the #2 conference behind the SEC.

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Well, they don't have the best record in games between winning AQ teams in the BCS era for nothing, including 10-6 vs the SEC.

    This past year though, I would put them as the #2 conference behind the SEC.

    facepalm_msu

    signature image signature image signature image

    sf2k4 ●

  • star69 said...

    Should have listened to his parents.lol Don't know how parents can be so oblivious to what was transpiring at USC?confused

    If you make a decision on where to go to school based on a position coach you are an idiot.

    Fight_On1014

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Based on the fact that Ucla beat Nebraska, Oregon St and Stanford beat Wisconsin, Cal nearly beat Ohio St at the horseshoe and then got annihilated in Pac 12 play. Also, SC gave Stanford the same game 21-14 / 20-14 that Wisconsin did but SC played @ Stanford.

    I could see Ohio St finishing just ahead of Washington for 7th in the Pac12 last year and Michigan and Penn St battling Arizona St for 8th.

    The funny thing with you is that USC lost to UCLA and Stanford, didn't play Oregon St. and Cal lost to OSU. Your examples are crap.

    getmyjive11 ●

Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Features
Resources
Connect

247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports