Online Now 4052

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2251
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3991
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

What is wrong with ND Football?

  • CRgator1 said...

    I know they aren't USC's "natural" rival.

    Bama and LSU arent natural rivals either.

    By importance where would you rank the gms then?

    You would have it Notre Dame #1?

    In and out of relevancy as they are they (Stanford and Oregon) are relevant at the moment. And significantly more relevant than ND, at the moment.

    Like I said, especially with the Pac 12 having a conf championship gm, as well as the Big 10, it is more appealing for recruits to follow those in confetence gms.

    I simply oppose the word "rival", that involves tradition and respect.

    A team currently dominant means nothing more than an obstacle to get by to reach the desired goal. A win, you take joy in the victory and move on, a rival..you savor it and great plays become legend. 4th & 9 was only six years ago, and the players on that great team counted it the greatest victory of their careers...over the National Championship. That is a rivalry.

    This post was edited by usctrojan1 on 4/19/2012 at 12:38 AM

    signature image

    "Here are provided seats of meditative joy, where shall rise again the destined reign of Troy." Virgil

    usctrojan1

  • usctrojan1 said...

    I simply oppose the word "rival", that involves tradition and respect.

    A team currently dominant means nothing more than an obstacle to get by to reach the desired goal. A win, you take joy in the victory and move on, a rival..you savor it and great plays become legend. 4th & 9 was only six years ago, and the players on that great team counted it the greatest victory of their careers...over the National Championship. That is a rivalry.

    attachmentattachment
    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • usctrojan1 said...

    I simply oppose the word "rival", that involves tradition and respect.

    A team currently dominant means nothing more than an obstacle to get by to reach the desired goal. A win, you take joy in the victory and move on, a rival..you savor it and great plays become legend. 4th & 9 was only six years ago, and the players on that great team counted it the greatest victory of their careers...over the National Championship. That is a rivalry.

    I understand your view point on "rival".

    But, you get what Im saying about the conference championship gm changing things?

    When I said "rivalries picking up" thats what I was speaking about.

    Oregon/Stanford and USC I could see becoming rivals, due to possible matchups in the Pac champ gms.

    In ND's case that means there gms with UM and USC, sorta get pushed down the "impact" scale just a notch, not the rivalry though. Between the 2 fanbases(USC/ND that gm will stay impactful), but to the outside world, the other gms will be highly intriguing to most because of the conf championship bids. Wasnt dissing the rivalry at all, just putting it in perspective.

    I always want UF to beat FSU, but the UT/UGA gms are far more important.

    CRgator1

  • CRgator1 said...

    I understand your view point on "rival".

    But, you get what Im saying about the conference championship gm changing things?

    When I said "rivalries picking up" thats what I was speaking about.

    Oregon/Stanford and USC I could see becoming rivals, due to possible matchups in the Pac champ gms.

    In ND's case that means there gms with UM and USC, sorta get pushed down the "impact" scale just a notch, not the rivalry though. Between the 2 fanbases(USC/ND that gm will stay impactful), but to the outside world, the other gms will be highly intriguing to most because of the conf championship bids. Wasnt dissing the rivalry at all, just putting it in perspective.

    I always want UF to beat FSU, but the UT/UGA gms are far more important.

    No, you don't understand. You will never understand...nothing wrong with that, but the cultural divide, and what we hold dear are vastly different from what you are capable of understanding. Just like we can't fully understand your ways or conference pride.

    signature image

    "Here are provided seats of meditative joy, where shall rise again the destined reign of Troy." Virgil

    usctrojan1

  • usctrojan1 said...

    No, you don't understand. You will never understand...nothing wrong with that, but the cultural divide, and what we hold dear are vastly different from what you are capable of understanding. Just like we can't fully understand your ways or conference pride.

    attachment
    signature image signature image signature image

    NoVaNoles

  • usctrojan1 said...

    No, you don't understand. You will never understand...nothing wrong with that, but the cultural divide, and what we hold dear are vastly different from what you are capable of understanding. Just like we can't fully understand your ways or conference pride.

    Conference pride?

    You're gonna have to win the Pac12 conference championship gm to get to the Rose Bowl.

    Not ND.

    Maybe you dont understand, that Stanford beat you guys 2 yrs running, and Oregon won the Pac 12 championship gm last yr.

    And you guys beat ND. Yea hold that dearly then.

    CRgator1

  • NoVaNoles said...

    attachment
    signature image

    "Here are provided seats of meditative joy, where shall rise again the destined reign of Troy." Virgil

    usctrojan1

  • ND has an identity crisis. Somehow they have this vision of being an East coast school while stuck in South Bend Indiana which is hardly a cultural mecca at that. Northwestern located in Evanston is a way cooler and culturally diverse town. In some ways Pat Fitzgerald has the better job. Run a clean program, be competitive and have a job for life at a place where quality of life is through the roof.

    ErnieMcCracken

  • CRgator1 said...

    Conference pride?

    You're gonna have to win the Pac12 conference championship gm to get to the Rose Bowl.

    Not ND.

    Maybe you dont understand, that Stanford beat you guys 2 yrs running, and Oregon won the Pac 12 championship gm last yr.

    And you guys beat ND. Yea hold that dearly then.

    Stanford beat us THREE times. Oregon beat us THREE times in a row...Washington twice before last season....you still have no idea what I'm talking about.

    All those teams above did not beat us when we were good...IF, MAYBE that had happened, a relevant competition between us would mean something.

    This post was edited by usctrojan1 on 4/19/2012 at 1:24 AM

    signature image

    "Here are provided seats of meditative joy, where shall rise again the destined reign of Troy." Virgil

    usctrojan1

  • usctrojan1 said...

    Stanford beat us THREE times. Oregon beat us THREE times in a row...Washington twice before last season....you still have no idea what I'm talking about.

    We get it- SC is the traditional dominant power in the Pac.

    ErnieMcCracken

  • ErnieMcCracken said...

    We get it- SC is the traditional dominant power in the Pac.

    That wasn't my point either..

    signature image

    "Here are provided seats of meditative joy, where shall rise again the destined reign of Troy." Virgil

    usctrojan1

  • usctrojan1 said...

    That wasn't my point either..

    They why dont you just state it? ND is a traditional rival of my school but to be honest while I take pride I do not consider them a measuring stick anymore. That bar is pretty low to me.

    ErnieMcCracken

  • usctrojan1 said...

    Stanford beat us THREE times. Oregon beat us THREE times in a row...Washington twice before last season....you still have no idea what I'm talking about.

    Go back and read my previous posts.

    They're all in relation to the future of ND, not USC.

    With Stanford and Oregon coming full steam ahead, along with the Big 10 having a conf championship gm, and Meyer vs Hoke, ND will get the short end of the stick.

    The media will hype up the Pac 12's USC vs Stanford/Oregon matchups as potential conf championship gm matchups, like wise with the Big 10.

    Who follows media hype closely? Recruits do.

    ND recruits nationally, I know, but with conference expansions, in my opinion ND is the one team that it will hurt the most.

    I didnt say USC vs ND would be less of a rivalry, but it will not be as important in the grand scheme of things. This doesnt hurt USC, it will hurt ND.

    You're making this about USC and its really about the disadvantages that ND will be up against.

    Do you see ND being a contender over Oregon right now?

    CRgator1

  • CRgator1 said...

    Go back and read my previous posts.

    They're all in relation to the future of ND, not USC.

    With Stanford and Oregon coming full steam ahead, along with the Big 10 having a conf championship gm, and Meyer vs Hoke, ND will get the short end of the stick.

    The media will hype up the Pac 12's USC vs Stanford/Oregon matchups as potential conf championship gm matchups, like wise with the Big 10.

    Who follows media hype closely? Recruits do.

    ND recruits nationally, I know, but with conference expansions, in my opinion ND is the one team that it will hurt the most.

    I didnt say USC vs ND would be less of a rivalry, but it will not be as important in the grand scheme of things. This doesnt hurt USC, it will hurt ND.

    You're making this about USC and its really about the disadvantages that ND will be up against.

    Do you see ND being a contender over Oregon right now?

    Indiana brings in twice the TV money ND does. ND may not need the cash but that tells you right there how times have changed.

    ErnieMcCracken

  • ErnieMcCracken said...

    Indiana brings in twice the TV money ND does. ND may not need the cash but that tells you right there how times have changed.

    Damn. I didnt know ND was falling off like that, no disrespect to Indiana.

    CRgator1

  • CRgator1 said...

    Damn. I didnt know ND was falling off like that, no disrespect to Indiana.

    Its the same as the SEC schools. Take you lowest football school and they bring in tons of more cash than ND.

    ErnieMcCracken

  • ErnieMcCracken said...

    Its the same as the SEC schools. Take you lowest football school and they bring in tons of more cash than ND.

    I thought ND wasnt far behind Texas, at one time?

    Is it that they arent profiting?

    CRgator1

  • MrWoodson said...

    Bingo. You need to find your Pat Fitzgerald or Jim Harbaugh or Brady Hoke. Brian Kelly is just not the right coach.

    Fitzgerald or Franklin are at the top of my list. Both coach at academic institutes. Franklin needs a little more experience, but if BK fails miserably in 2013 he might be gone.

    signature image

    star69

  • Final Countdown said...

    A lot of these "reasons" relate to ND's recruiting. That isn't the problem. ND's talent is second to none. They just never do anything with it. Academic standards and cold weather have NOTHING to do with player development.

    "ND's talent is second to none" lol our CB play has been attrocious since Holtz left, except when Walton, walk-on soccer player, and Vontez graduated, horrible CB's. Bad hiring has played a huge role in this. TW and CW were the worst developers of talent I've seen. Take 5* talent and never develop it. ND has a lot of great things going for it, unfortunately these great things normally don't appeal to the elite HS kids. Indiana has horrible history of producing talent, weather sucks, academics are stringent, not a party school, ugly girls, and so on. I'm patiently waiting for the day ND relocates to FL.biggrin

    This post was edited by star69 on 4/19/2012 at 2:37 AM

    signature image

    star69

  • What is wrong with ND Football?

    Entitlement.

    That entitlement leads to poor work ethic. They get some recruits to sign the paper just because it says "Notre Dame" on it. But what does "Notre Dame" mean now? They aren't winning and it's not the only team on TV anymore.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Face Stabber

  • SpartanRocky said...

    Warning: This is going to be long.

    I think it's the same thing that turned Michigan State from a powerhouse in the 50's and 60's into a program fighting for respectability: lack of coaching stability, albeit for a time much shorter than MSU's, and an administration who is not willing to allow a coach enough time to develop his players.

    Seriously: ND has had 4 coaches from the start of the '97 season. That's 4 coaches in 15 years; on average, your coaches, on average, have not seen their first full recruiting class graduate. On top of that, your last 3 coaches have all had different schemes: Willingham tried to go West-Coast from the option, Weiss a down-field pro-style O, and Kelly runs a spread. FWIW, Willingham and Weiss ran 4-3's and Kelly a 3-4.

    I don't care how good the players your getting are, kids that have to learn new schemes in the middle of their career are not going to reach their full college potential. You're going to be forced to swallow some bad seasons, as there's usually a dip when the last class of a failed predecessor, often reduced due to the attrition following a coaching change, along with that coach's first class (short recruiting time due to coaching hires being done usually between Nov. and Jan.) become your program's only upper classmen.

    If ND wants to succeed, it needs to have a coach who isn't looking over his shoulder after his second year. Unfortunately, Notre Dame appears to have the expectation that it just needs the right coach, and it should instantly be a national title contender. That allows for little room for error, and gives the ND coach 0 room for error.

    Case in point: This year has become almost a "must win big" year for Kelly; after a solid first year, including a bowl W, Notre Dame regressed last season. Quite frankly, the Irish should have been 10-2, as 5 TO games against both South Florida and Michigan would likely have gone the Irish's way if they committed just 1 less TO in each. I am not trying to rub salt in the wound

    The practical effect of losing those 2 games is that Kelly has had identical records in his first 2 seasons (8-5). Now, 8-5 isn't terrible, but it's not nationally elite. I'd assume 2 "ok" years are fine at ND, providing that year 3 shows marked improvement. If those 2 games go the other way, Kelly likely has a BCS bowl bid in his pocket and some insurance for year 3. Why is that important? Well . . .

    Notre Dame's '12 schedule is nothing short of brutal. Games @Oklahoma, @Michigan State, @USC are all top 10-15 match-ups on the road, plus the Irish host Michigan (top 10ish preseason), Stanford (top 25) and Miami(FL) (Possibly top 25). Notre Dame could go 7-5 next year and not be upset once. The Irish could well be a much better team in '12 than in '11, but with little improvement of their record.

    As long as Notre Dame does not suffer a losing season, I think the Irish need to not only keep Brian Kelly, but make it clear that he is not on the hotseat. If he is fired, the Notre Dame rebuilding process is going to be set back another few years at least, as the next coach comes in. At some point ND needs to pick a guy and stick with him.

    Stability is everything in college football, and Notre Dame is proof that even the most prestigious of college football powers need it.

    Nailed it. The AD knows how brutal this season will be with the schedule we have. Fans might not believe this but 7-5 will be a good year, AD knows that. Expectations are brought on by fans when the AD starts listening then we're in trouble. BK has made some very questionable calls in a few games and TO's are a product of an undisciplined team, which falls on coaching staff. TO's are horrible, but when they happen inside 20 or the 20 yard line it's a complete momentum killer. Not sure on exact #'s but USF game had 2, UM game had 2, and USC game at least 1. There were more than that. USF and USC returned TD's from our 1 yard line. We were in every game besides Stanford. Heck USC owned us the first half, but we were about to tie it late in 3rd. Having too many TO's, plus a low amount of TO's forced, and worst PR team in country can and will kill a season. BK fuked around last year leaving Rees in most of the year. Now he's looking for a QB. His career hedges on finding a QB this year. If Rees is starting QB he's as good as gone, that's the mindset of many ND fans, weak arm and a tree in the pocket. Not conducive for a spread attack.

    signature image

    star69

  • TerpsSoccer said...

    pretty sure it's great for college football when ND is bad. Its god getting them back for playing with kids.

    The Catholics.

    Maryland fans please stay out of football conversations. We sucked this year and still beat the brakes of your shitty team.

    signature image

    star69

  • CWEBB said...

    Assuming BK is gone after this year, who’s got the best shot at this job? Would Pete Carroll give it a look if the Seahawks decide to get rid of him after this season?

    BK will not be gone after this year, unless he quits. I'd wager a year ban from tBB on this.

    signature image

    star69

  • Face Stabber said...

    What is wrong with ND Football?

    Entitlement.

    That entitlement leads to poor work ethic. They get some recruits to sign the paper just because it says "Notre Dame" on it. But what does "Notre Dame" mean now? They aren't winning and it's not the only team on TV anymore.

    Damn, I read through all four pages of this thread just to make sure no one mentioned a sense of entitlement before mentioning a sense of entitlement as a reason. You beat me to it.

    And, it's true. Notre Dame players and even worse, ND coaches automatically develop a sense of entitlement as soon as they become associated with the program. I don't know if it just a historic spirit that hangs around the school and infects them or if it's the sense of entitlement that, for some odd reason, ND fans still have that clouds their judgment.

    I remember when Kelly was first hired and he had his first press conference to introduce himself to the alumni, the students, the faculty, and the nation. He kept going on and on and on about what it meant to be part of Notre Dame. What it meant as a player, what it meant as a coach, what it meant overall in the whole scheme of history.

    I knew right then that Notre Dame was in for trouble. It was almost as if Kelly just expected good things to happen because it was Notre Dame and apparently because he was now at Notre Dame. I don't remember any mentions of hard work or dedication or any of that kind of stuff, just references to "what it meant" and "how it was going to be because of who ND was."

    It struck a chord with me because Coach Saban spent about a year lecturing Bama fans, students, players, and anyone that would listen to his long rambles that it meant absolutely nothing to him about what Alabama used to be. Basically, he was telling everyone that for anything to ever be better at Alabama, everyone was going to have to get over the "We Are's" and concentrate on the present day.

    This included fans, players, staff, the whole school, etc... was going to have to work together and that history meant absolutely nothing. I don't hear that from ND fans now and I definitely didn't hear that from Kelly when he was hired.

    "The same things win that always won... and we just have a different bunch of excuses if we lose." --Paul W. Bryant

    Notre Dame has a lot of excuses now and not enough willpower to change it.

    This post was edited by CtrlAltDel on 4/19/2012 at 2:37 AM

    signature image

    http://s151.photobucket.com/albums/s156/CtrlAltieDel/Bama/

    CtrlAltDel

  • mriderblue12 said...

    Say what you want about Hoke he's got the job done. I know it's hard to admit, but ND hasn't seen that level of success in a long time on the field, or in recruiting.

    You need to find a guy who loves ND, knows what it stands for and sells that well. Fitzgerald has been a great hire for NW, Dantonio for MSU. All these guys don't have the egos and are in it for the kids as opposed to themselves.

    Kelly doesn't care about ND, he cares about his reputation and thought ND would be a good platform for him. ND is a sleeping giant, get someone in there who is blue collared loves the school and they will go to work IMO.

    Love what Hoke is doing, but slow down. You guys had a very favorable schedule and caught all the breaks. Did anyone think VT would beat you in NOLA, not counting Buckeye/Hokie fans? ND saw that level of success in CW's first 2 years. Agree with the last part. What's your prediction on the upcoming season?

    signature image

    star69