Online Now 3763

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1827
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3571
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

What will you pay due to "fiscal cliff"?

  • well...I figured we are about to pay about $5,000-$6,000 more in taxes next year, plus we'll probably take about an $8,000 hit in investments over the next few months. As a middle class family who works hard to save and increase our monthly discretionary income, F.U. democrats and republicans both. Go F yourselves. Sticking it to everyone in the middle of clawing back out of a recession. Thanks.

    signature image

    3

    cockengr

  • cockengr said...

    well...I figured we are about to pay about $5,000-$6,000 more in taxes next year, plus we'll probably take about an $8,000 hit in investments over the next few months. As a middle class family who works hard to save and increase our monthly discretionary income, F.U. democrats and republicans both. Go F yourselves. Sticking it to everyone in the middle of clawing back out of a recession. Thanks.

    Amen brother!

    First thing cut should be all the numbnuts in Congress as well as the President. They should all be re-called and replaced if they cant figure this out.

    SameoleReb

  • Tax Dollars At War

    Based on a animated by Chris Fontaine produced by Softbox

    www.youtube.com
    signature image

    devidee

  • devidee said...

    cliffs? cannot watch on work computer - if interesting will watch later tonight

    signature image

    3

    cockengr

  • cockengr said...

    cliffs? cannot watch on work computer - if interesting will watch later tonight

    The majority of our tax money goes to pay for war or organizations that support war.

    This post was edited by devidee on 12/21/2012 at 9:20 AM

    signature image

    devidee

  • Why do we continually elect inept people? Says something about us if we keep letting them make us worse and worse as a nation (IMO):

    WRobins

  • WRobins said...

    Why do we continually elect inept people? Says something about us if we keep letting them make us worse and worse as a nation (IMO):

    We elect people that we can "relate" with

    MarylandDawg

  • News flash, folks: these people are responsible if we go over the fiscal cliff.

    Boehner Tax Plan in House Is Pulled, Lacking Votes - NYTimes.com

    Speaker John A. Boehner abruptly halted efforts to pass fallback legislation to prevent a fiscal crisis after conservative Republicans refused to allow taxes to rise even on the most affluent.

    www.nytimes.com
    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • CMXI said...

    News flash, folks: these people are responsible if we go over the fiscal cliff.

    Way to make it partisan....

    mpcoan

  • CMXI said...

    News flash, folks: these people are responsible if we go over the fiscal cliff.

    as a lifelong conservative, I am disappointed in replublicans big time. Boehner to me did well in a very, very tough position, and he just got his ass thrown under the bus.

    However, democrats are to blame also. They are sitting back and doing nothing allowing this to happen for their political gain. Obama ran on working both sides, spending/entitlement reform and revenue, and yet he will not identify any significant plans on entitlement reform. He was so unmoving that Boehner virtually had to do all the work himself, and now he is the one getting crucified when he appears to be the only person actually TRYING to get something done.

    signature image

    3

    cockengr

  • devidee said...

    The majority of our tax money goes to pay for war or organizations that support war.

    But we need to be "safe"

    Who cares that we face no real military threat and that the threats can be avoided by smarter security systems.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre

  • cockengr said...

    as a lifelong conservative, I am disappointed in replublicans big time. Boehner to me did well in a very, very tough position, and he just got his ass thrown under the bus.

    However, democrats are to blame also. They are sitting back and doing nothing allowing this to happen for their political gain. Obama ran on working both sides, spending/entitlement reform and revenue, and yet he will not identify any significant plans on entitlement reform. He was so unmoving that Boehner virtually had to do all the work himself, and now he is the one getting crucified when he appears to be the only person actually TRYING to get something done.

    Are you kidding me? Democrats doing nothing? Have you seen the most recent proposals from the Obama administration?

    If Democrats were sitting back and doing nothing, Boehner's "Plan B" would never have been an option. Obama has given up a payroll tax holiday extension, acceded to many of Boehner's revenue demands, agreed to cuts in aid programs (FFS, a Democrat agreed to cut Social Security benefits - do you know how unpopular that is?), and even opened up to the idea of extending the Bush tax cuts for earned income under $1,000,000/year, as opposed to only $250,000/year.

    Dan Burton (R-Ind.) has it right. The Republican Party has already won a victory by seeing Obama change his demands at all. If we go over the fiscal cliff, this deal goes out the window and Obama has the entire tide of public opinion on his side. He also has the best bully pulpit in the nation, the State of the Union address, in which to further argue his points. This is the time to make a deal, but the extremist wing of the Republican party won't allow that to happen.

    Dan Burton On Tax Cuts: GOP Would Swallow Democratic Tax Plan After December

    WASHINGTON -- If a fiscal cliff deal isnd accept the $250,000 limit today.

    www.huffingtonpost.com
    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • CMXI said...

    Are you kidding me? Democrats doing nothing? Have you seen the most recent proposals from the Obama administration?

    If Democrats were sitting back and doing nothing, Boehner's "Plan B" would never have been an option. Obama has given up a payroll tax holiday extension, acceded to many of Boehner's revenue demands, agreed to cuts in aid programs (FFS, a Democrat agreed to cut Social Security benefits - do you know how unpopular that is?), and even opened up to the idea of extending the Bush tax cuts for earned income under $1,000,000/year, as opposed to only $250,000/year.

    Dan Burton (R-Ind.) has it right. The Republican Party has already won a victory by seeing Obama change his demands at all. If we go over the fiscal cliff, this deal goes out the window and Obama has the entire tide of public opinion on his side. He also has the best bully pulpit in the nation, the State of the Union address, in which to further argue his points. This is the time to make a deal, but the extremist wing of the Republican party won't allow that to happen.

    actually we are not too far in disagreement. That is actually what I meant when I said that Obama and them are sitting back and letting it happen for their political gain - - meaning exactly what that article and you are saying, he isn't too interested in compromising right now so he can get in that stronger position next year. hopefully taking that strategy doesn't damage the markets too bad because people freak out. I know eventually they will make the cuts retroactive at whatever level they agree to.

    I thought Obama drew the line at $400,000, not $1MM....(like any of those numbers mean jackchit to me!)

    signature image

    3

    cockengr

  • cockengr said...

    actually we are not too far in disagreement. That is actually what I meant when I said that Obama and them are sitting back and letting it happen for their political gain - - meaning exactly what that article and you are saying, he isn't too interested in compromising right now so he can get in that stronger position next year. hopefully taking that strategy doesn't damage the markets too bad because people freak out. I know eventually they will make the cuts retroactive at whatever level they agree to.

    I thought Obama drew the line at $400,000, not $1MM....(like any of those numbers mean jackchit to me!)

    He started at $250,000, moved to $400,000 and signaled willingness to move a little bit higher, to $700-800k.

    $1M/year is so, so, SO high that it's infuriating. We're not talking about millionaires, we're talking about people who could blow all the money they've ever saved in Vegas and then become millionaires again in 365 days. It's not the wealthiest 1%. It's the wealthiest 0.19%. And we're only going back to the tax rates of the Clinton era!

    Republicans control the house and this bill has to start in the house. The biggest problem is that the moderate wing of the Republican party has been almost wiped out. The ultra-conservatives refused to raise rates on the wealthiest 0.19%. And that was the REPUBLICAN plan, not a compromise.

    RabbitSC

  • RabbitSC said...

    He started at $250,000, moved to $400,000 and signaled willingness to move a little bit higher, to $700-800k.

    $1M/year is so, so, SO high that it's infuriating. We're not talking about millionaires, we're talking about people who could blow all the money they've ever saved in Vegas and then become millionaires again in 365 days. It's not the wealthiest 1%. It's the wealthiest 0.19%. And we're only going back to the tax rates of the Clinton era!

    Republicans control the house and this bill has to start in the house. The biggest problem is that the moderate wing of the Republican party has been almost wiped out. The ultra-conservatives refused to raise rates on the wealthiest 0.19%. And that was the REPUBLICAN plan, not a compromise.

    I think as you pointed out, and so did the article, that Obama doesn't have too much motivation to compromise too much prior to end of the year. I am more frustrated with the republican side though, as I said earlier.

    $1MM in taxable income annually, agreed, is pretty dang rich....more than most multi-millionaires.

    This post was edited by cockengr on 12/21/2012 at 12:20 PM

    signature image

    3

    cockengr

  • One side has made concessions while the other side has not.

    Take and educated guess on who is who.

    signature image signature image signature image

    shortcbaseballa

  • To be honest, it was really just the forty or so whackjobs who refused to even vote for Boehner's plan B that will probably be the tipping point. They won't raise taxes on anyone or anything ever, so...

    To look on the bright side, this might force an easier compromise since most would rather have ~$1.2T in increased tax revenue (Obama plan all along) in addition to $1.2T in spending cuts than $3.6T in increased taxes in addition to trillions in spending cuts.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    To be honest, it was really just the forty or so whackjobs who refused to even vote for Boehner's plan B that will probably be the tipping point. They won't raise taxes on anyone or anything ever, so...

    To look on the bright side, this might force an easier compromise since most would rather have ~$1.2T in increased tax revenue (Obama plan all along) in addition to $1.2T in spending cuts than $3.6T in increased taxes in addition to trillions in spending cuts.

    This is why, if Boehner wants to get anything done, he'll get a coalition of 50 or so of the most moderate Republicans together and pass a modified plan that's simply an agreement between the Democrats and the moderate Republicans. If "Plan B" couldn't even get approved, Boehner will never get unanimous support for any plan even remotely within striking distance of a possible agreement.

    Of course, this would also be political suicide, so it's never going to happen.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • cockengr said...

    actually we are not too far in disagreement. That is actually what I meant when I said that Obama and them are sitting back and letting it happen for their political gain - - meaning exactly what that article and you are saying, he isn't too interested in compromising right now so he can get in that stronger position next year. hopefully taking that strategy doesn't damage the markets too bad because people freak out. I know eventually they will make the cuts retroactive at whatever level they agree to.

    I thought Obama drew the line at $400,000, not $1MM....(like any of those numbers mean jackchit to me!)

    The thing is though, Obama has made multiple concessions to get closer to a deal. This is not a situation where Obama put one offer on the table and then said "take it or leave it."

    What we're seeing is a situation similar to the last debt ceiling negotiations. Certain elements of the Republican party have latched onto something that they can hold hostage in return for more concessions. Last time, it was the U.S. credit rating, which Republicans held hostage (despite the damage it would do to the country) in order to force excessive concessions. The same thing is happening here. The extension of tax cuts for the middle class is being held hostage in return for excessive concessions, despite how much this gamesmanship will cost the middle class.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • I think the Dems are mistaken. Dou you think R's are worried about tarnishing their brand? Obama's got to cut spending for this to work.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Sir Mix A Lot

  • FL Buckeye said...

    I think the Dems are mistaken. Dou you think R's are worried about tarnishing their brand? Obama's got to cut spending for this to work.

    For a subset that is determined to not raise taxes at all, I see it as damaging that they not get painted as forcing triple would could have been prevented.

    That said, cutting the deficit is a win-win for either side, but having to deal with another recession ruins any plans for grand reforms in energy, immigration etc.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • The R's are willing to raise taxes, Obama is unwilling to cut. What hsppened to 3:1 spending cuts, Obamas proposal isnt even 1:1 in real dollars.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Sir Mix A Lot

  • FL Buckeye said...

    The R's are willing to raise taxes, Obama is unwilling to cut. What hsppened to 3:1 spending cuts, Obamas proposal isnt even 1:1 in real dollars.

    Nah. O is willing to cut spending. That's why he has proposed spending cuts. facepalm_msu

    O's spending cuts> Boehner's revenue proposals.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Nah. O is willing to cut spending. That's why he has proposed spending cuts. facepalm_msu

    O's spending cuts> Boehner's revenue proposals.

    Again, there has been no concessions by the Republicans. The Democrats have made concessions.

    What's funny is recent polls about who is causing the Fiscal Cliff are showing that the american people believe the Republicans are standing in the way. Huge change from last year.

    They can only blame themselves.

    signature image signature image signature image

    shortcbaseballa

  • I interviewed a highly respected tax lawyer with a work background that gives him plenty of insight about this situation.

    He felt that the best strategy would be for Obama to let the fiscal cliff happen because then he would be able to put his plan in place with the least amount of resistance.

    AbsenteeTrojan