Online Now 3444

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2365
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3590
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Which School Is Quarterback U?

  • jmsmooth33 said...

    YOu can thank the BCS for riding your jock two of those NC's you had one loss..

    Cry about it all you want, but there was no doubt Alabama had the best team in the country in 2011 and 2012. Feelsgoodman

    bigwilly64

  • shavisimo2 said...

    Oy vey, it's Friday night and I don't have an hour to find stats to come up with to say why this is ludicrous. But, for example on why AV is ridiculous to best linebackers currently in the NFL, NaVorro Bowman is rated a 34. Lofa Tatupu is a 48. So, a top 5 LB in the game today (as rated by most people, many argued last season that he's the best ILB right now) is significantly lower than a guy who hasn't played since 2010. Ridiculous. 45/188 of your points (about 25%) are in a guy who last played a snap of professional football in 3 years - and that's how you justify your "current players are better for USC" argument.

    Also, HOF is 2-0 all time, which you conveniently left out (pretty significant notch on a belt for "position U" designation, wouldn't you agree).

    If you are making the argument for this year only, then I understand why you think it is ludicrous. But I thought we were talking about current NFL players (meaning their entire career, so far). So, it depends on that.

    For current players encompassing their entire career work to this point, USC wins.
    If we are talking about this past year only, then Penn St wins because Cushing, Tatupu, and Perry were all injured.

    As far as the AV rating, maybe you don't understand how it works, but Bowman is the 2nd highest rated player in his draft class of 2010 (right behind Gronkowski), so I don't know what you are complaining about. The AV rating is based on an a player's entire career, so I guy like Tatupu, who was a top ILB for about 4 years, is going to be rated ahead of a guy like Bowman who has only been starting in the NFL for 2 years.

    Good point about the HOF's, that's something that should have been in the comparison.
    Although it will be 2-1 when Seau is inducted.

    The debate with the current LB's is close, but overall throughout USC's and Penn State's history, USC LB's have pretty much doubled Penn State's LB's production in the NFL.

    LB's with an NFL Approx Value above 50.

    PENN ST (6)
    ============
    Jack Ham 128
    Dave Robinson 94
    Matt Millen 67
    Chuck Drazenovich 64
    Ralph Baker 63
    Shane Conlan 59

    USC (12)
    ===========
    Junior Seau 125
    Clay Matthews 96
    Willie McGinest 78
    Rod Martin 76
    Chip Banks 72
    Marlin McKeever 66
    Duane Bickett 63
    Charlie Weaver 60
    Jack Del Rio 56
    Riki Ellison 52
    Gary Cobb 51
    Richard Wood 51

    LB's over 70 AV
    USC - 5
    Penn St - 2

    LB U must be based on Penn St math, where 6 is greater than 12, and 2 is greater than 5.
    roflmao

    This post was edited by NcaaAssassinG13 on 3/9/2013 at 6:59 PM

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    If you are making the argument for this year only, then I understand why you think it is ludicrous. But I thought we were talking about current NFL players (meaning their entire career, so far). So, it depends on that.

    For current players encompassing their entire career work to this point, USC wins. If we are talking about this past year only, then Penn St wins because Cushing, Tatupu, and Perry were all injured.

    As far as the AV rating, maybe you don't understand how it works, but Bowman is the 2nd highest rated player in his draft class of 2010 (right behind Gronkowski), so I don't know what you are complaining about. The AV rating is based on an a player's entire career, so I guy like Tatupu, who was a top ILB for about 4 years, is going to be rated ahead of a guy like Bowman who has only been starting in the NFL for 2 years.

    Good point about the HOF's, that's something that should have been in the comparison. Although it will be 2-1 when Seau is inducted.

    The debate with the current LB's is close, but overall throughout USC's and Penn State's history, USC LB's have pretty much doubled Penn State's LB's production in the NFL.

    LB's with an NFL Approx Value above 50.

    PENN ST (6) ============ Jack Ham 128 Dave Robinson 94 Matt Millen 67 Chuck Drazenovich 64 Ralph Baker 63 Shane Conlan 59

    USC (12) =========== Junior Seau 125 Clay Matthews 96 Willie McGinest 78 Rod Martin 76 Chip Banks 72 Marlin McKeever 66 Duane Bickett 63 Charlie Weaver 60 Jack Del Rio 56 Riki Ellison 52 Gary Cobb 51 Richard Wood 51

    LB's over 70 AV USC - 5 Penn St - 2

    LB U must be based on Penn St math, where 6 is greater than 12, and 2 is greater than 5. roflmao

    A few things:

    This year, PSU is better, as you admit. So - Current success = PSU over USC.

    Current players encompassing career, you're including a known substance abuse policy offender and a player who played his last meaningful snap in 2010 . Love that those are your players who nullify the injury factor. Sean Lee has had ridiculous injury struggles and probably matches Cushing + Perry combined. Tatupu last played when Michael Vick was Comeback POTY.

    Pretend like I don't understand AV. Tha'ts ridiculous, but I'm complaining about your use of it to say USC's current crop of LB's are better than PSU's when 25% of your current AV is based on Tatupu, a man who hasn't played in 3 years. His total is 33% greater than a guy who is widely regarded as a top 5 LB in the league right now. So, your evaluation of current players is based on AV which has Tatupu well ahead of Bowman. No rational observer would agree with that. But you want to use it to enhance your argument. Cherry picking stats is great and all, but rational observers tend to disagree.

    Anyway, PSU was bestowed the honor of LBU from the national media. The media gave our school the honor. Someone else could take it away, but looking at the guys in the NFL right now, it wouldn't make sense to take the honor away. It's not like someone at Penn State said "hey, we're linebacker university." The national media looked at linebacker histories and decided PSU should have that title. As USCtrojan1 said, PSU remains LBU until someone knocks us off that perch. To say that a crop of LBs from USC which is relatively equal to PSU's crop of linebackers takes away that title is short sighted.

    PSU is LBU. That doesn't demean USC's crop of LB's of the years. USC has a very rich tradition of LB's. But they are not LBU - not historically and not currently. When people hear LBU, more often than not they think PSU. For good reason. I hope that doesn't change, but success in general is cyclical, so who knows.

    signature image

    #DicedPineapples

    shavisimo2

  • shavisimo2 said...

    A few things:

    This year, PSU is better, as you admit. So - Current success = PSU over USC.

    Current players encompassing career, you're including a known substance abuse policy offender and a player who played his last meaningful snap in 2010 . Love that those are your players who nullify the injury factor. Sean Lee has had ridiculous injury struggles and probably matches Cushing + Perry combined. Tatupu last played when Michael Vick was Comeback POTY.

    Pretend like I don't understand AV. Tha'ts ridiculous, but I'm complaining about your use of it to say USC's current crop of LB's are better than PSU's when 25% of your current AV is based on Tatupu, a man who hasn't played in 3 years. His total is 33% greater than a guy who is widely regarded as a top 5 LB in the league right now. So, your evaluation of current players is based on AV which has Tatupu well ahead of Bowman. No rational observer would agree with that. But you want to use it to enhance your argument. Cherry picking stats is great and all, but rational observers tend to disagree.

    Anyway, PSU was bestowed the honor of LBU from the national media. The media gave our school the honor. Someone else could take it away, but looking at the guys in the NFL right now, it wouldn't make sense to take the honor away. It's not like someone at Penn State said "hey, we're linebacker university." The national media looked at linebacker histories and decided PSU should have that title. As USCtrojan1 said, PSU remains LBU until someone knocks us off that perch. To say that a crop of LBs from USC which is relatively equal to PSU's crop of linebackers takes away that title is short sighted.

    PSU is LBU. That doesn't demean USC's crop of LB's of the years. USC has a very rich tradition of LB's. But they are not LBU - not historically and not currently. When people hear LBU, more often than not they think PSU. For good reason. I hope that doesn't change, but success in general is cyclical, so who knows.

    Not current success, just last season. Next season could be different.
    Funny all that talk about Tatupu, when you are basing Penn State's merits partly
    on a guy who was playing defensive end this year (Wake), and partly on another
    guy (Hali) who played DE his first couple of years.

    I was going to give Penn St the edge on the current players, but I decided to look up
    the numbers after reading your last post.

    I'm glad I did, USC's current NFL Linebackers out perform Penn St like usual.
    It's not as decisive as the all-time LB stats for USC over Penn St are, in fact it's rather close,
    but USC still has the better numbers.

    Stats from each groups top 6 LB's (when playing LB)
    USC - Matthews,Tatupu,Cushing,Maulauga,Rivers,Maiava.
    PSU - Bowman,Hali,Wake,Polusnzky,Lee,Connor.

    Tackles
    USC 1,239
    Penn St 1,221

    Sacks
    Penn St 85
    USC 70

    Interceptions
    USC 26
    Penn St 17

    Touchdowns
    USC 3
    Penn St 1

    I guess you thought a little too highly of your current group of LB's.

    BTW, did Wake and Bowman play against USC in the Rose Bowl. Serious question,
    because if they did, I didn't even notice them out there while USC was scoring at on the Penn St D.
    Maybe they were hurt.

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • shavisimo2 said...

    Anyway, PSU was bestowed the honor of LBU from the national media. The media gave our school the honor. Someone else could take it away, but looking at the guys in the NFL right now, it wouldn't make sense to take the honor away. The national media looked at linebacker histories and decided PSU should have that title. As USCtrojan1 said, PSU remains LBU until someone knocks us off that perch. To say that a crop of LBs from USC which is relatively equal to PSU's crop of linebackers takes away that title is short sighted.

    Btw, I'm not saying that the current crop USC LB's takes away the title of LB U,
    I'm saying that title was taken a long time ago, and I'm not sure exactly why PSU was ever called
    that in the first place.

    That's why I am saying USC is the real LB U, not just given the name by the "national media".
    It should be earned, not given. How about this, you tell me why Penn St is the real LB U after
    comparing the resumes.

    ------------------------------------------------------------USC------------------PSU
    1st round NFL draft picks.............................12...........................5
    Seasons named All-Pro................................13*........................10
    Seasons named to Pro Bowl.........................43.........................26
    Hall of Fame(*Seau will be 1st ballot HoF).....0...........................2
    Seasons as a primary starter.......................224.......................152
    Total amount of LB's w/ AV above 50...........12...........................6
    AV rating total value...................................1,627....................1,290
    Average AV rating per LB............................27.1......................23.9

    *12 without Cushing's year.

    The only category Penn St leads is HoF's which will be 2-1 when Seau is inducted. Really, it's not even close,
    anybody who is not being a homer can see that.

    This post was edited by NcaaAssassinG13 on 3/9/2013 at 10:01 PM

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Not current success, just last season. Next season could be different. Funny all that talk about Tatupu, when you are basing Penn State's merits partly on a guy who was playing defensive end this year (Wake), and partly on another guy (Hali) who played DE his first couple of years.

    I was going to give Penn St the edge on the current players, but I decided to look up the numbers after reading your last post.

    I'm glad I did, USC's current NFL Linebackers out perform Penn St like usual. It's not as decisive as the all-time LB stats for USC over Penn St are, in fact it's rather close, but USC still has the better numbers.

    Stats from each groups top 6 LB's (when playing LB) USC - Matthews,Tatupu,Cushing,Maulauga,Rivers,Maiava. PSU - Bowman,Hali,Wake,Polusnzky,Lee,Connor.

    Tackles USC 1,239 Penn St 1,221

    Sacks Penn St 85 USC 70

    Interceptions USC 26 Penn St 17

    Touchdowns USC 3 Penn St 1

    I guess you thought a little too highly of your current group of LB's.

    BTW, did Wake and Bowman play against USC in the Rose Bowl. Serious question, because if they did, I didn't even notice them out there while USC was scoring at on the Penn St D. Maybe they were hurt.

    Why would you give me career tackles when discussing current success? Why would you include Derek Wake when he is now a DE? Why would you include Tatupu when he hasn't played since 2010? Cherry picking as usual.

    As for your bowl thing on Wake and Bowman, Wake already graduated and Bowman was named on the "All-Bowl" team after he had a Rose Bowl record 5 tackles for loss. USC abused our DBs... the LBs played well and limited USC to only 61 yards on 35 carries. What a tool you are.

    getmyjive11

  • getmyjive11 said...

    Why would you give me career tackles when discussing current success? Why would you include Derek Wake when he is now a DE? Why would you include Tatupu when he hasn't played since 2010? Cherry picking as usual.

    As for your bowl thing on Wake and Bowman, Wake already graduated and Bowman was named on the "All-Bowl" team after he had a Rose Bowl record 5 tackles for loss. USC abused our DBs... the LBs played well and limited USC to only 61 yards on 35 carries. What a tool you are.

    Hey, I'm surprised you came back for more abuse. You must love tool.

    Bowman played? Really? I must have been too busy celebrating all those touchdowns to notice. Besides, nobody on a defense, that gave up like 30 by halftime had a good game.

    Or you must mean it was like Kerry Collins Super Bowl good.

    Either way LB U is now located in sunny SoCal . I like how you Penn Staters are avoiding the all-time LB numbers like the plague, must be hard to argue your case when it's about 2/1 in every category in favor of SC.

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • Legends aren't built on statistics alone..legendary status and nicknames at a particular position, are not self awarded...it's the perception of unbroken excellence that leads the media and the nation to award the "Linebacker U" "Tailback U" and so on.

    A university does not have to produce the "best of" in the position...just produce a long line of outstanding players. What I've read, NFL coaches praise Penn State LBs for their toughness and well coached coming out of college. USC still remains known as "Tailback U" even though it's been a long time since "thunder and lightning" Guess it's the Heismans.

    As for the 2009 Rose Bowl (I was there), our passing game was on fire..we did absolutely abuse their DBs, while they pretty much stuffed our run game...that is why none of us could understand why Pete backed off the passing game and began running the ball in the second half - check the stats, why did we back off from what was clearly lighting them up? Appears Pete was awestruck with JoePa and did not wish to embarrass him? Who knows, I do know that Mark and our WRs did not like it one bit.

    signature image

    "Here are provided seats of meditative joy, where shall rise again the destined reign of Troy." Virgil

    usctrojan1

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Hey, I'm surprised you came back for more abuse. You must love tool.

    Bowman played? Really? I must have been too busy celebrating all those touchdowns to notice. Besides, nobody on a defense, that gave up like 30 by halftime had a good game.

    Or you must mean it was like Kerry Collins Super Bowl good.

    Either way LB U is now located in sunny SoCal . I like how you Penn Staters are avoiding the all-time LB numbers like the plague, must be hard to argue your case when it's about 2/1 in every category in favor of SC.

    By your logic, you would question a RB having a good game if a defense shut down the QB. As I said, the LBs allowed only 61 yards on 35 carries. If you watched the game, you would know what the issue was. To call out Bowman is a joke. It makes you look like a fool, even more so when you asked about Wake who wasn't even on the team (and hadn't been for two years).

    This post was edited by getmyjive11 on 3/10/2013 at 11:06 AM

    getmyjive11

  • Why are you guys arguing about LBU when that title is undoubtedly located in Tuscaloosa?

    bigwilly64

  • bigwilly64 said...

    Why are you guys arguing about LBU when that title is undoubtedly located in Tuscaloosa?

    sorry

    getmyjive11

  • bigwilly64 said...

    Why are you guys arguing about LBU when that title is undoubtedly located in Tuscaloosa?

    roflmao

    signature image signature image signature image

    ‏@Cordale10 Why should we have to go to class if we came here to play FOOTBALL, we ain't come to play SCHOOL, classes are POINTLESS

    Texas Lion

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Not current success, just last season. Next season could be different. Funny all that talk about Tatupu, when you are basing Penn State's merits partly on a guy who was playing defensive end this year (Wake), and partly on another guy (Hali) who played DE his first couple of years.

    I was going to give Penn St the edge on the current players, but I decided to look up the numbers after reading your last post.

    I'm glad I did, USC's current NFL Linebackers out perform Penn St like usual. It's not as decisive as the all-time LB stats for USC over Penn St are, in fact it's rather close, but USC still has the better numbers.

    Stats from each groups top 6 LB's (when playing LB) USC - Matthews,Tatupu,Cushing,Maulauga,Rivers,Maiava. PSU - Bowman,Hali,Wake,Polusnzky,Lee,Connor.

    Tackles USC 1,239 Penn St 1,221

    Sacks Penn St 85 USC 70

    Interceptions USC 26 Penn St 17

    Touchdowns USC 3 Penn St 1

    I guess you thought a little too highly of your current group of LB's.

    BTW, did Wake and Bowman play against USC in the Rose Bowl. Serious question, because if they did, I didn't even notice them out there while USC was scoring at on the Penn St D. Maybe they were hurt.

    attachment
    signature image signature image signature image

    ‏@Cordale10 Why should we have to go to class if we came here to play FOOTBALL, we ain't come to play SCHOOL, classes are POINTLESS

    Texas Lion

  • Texas Lion said...

    roflmao

    Oh God, you've been hanging out with Nova too much. Posting the smiling emoticons is a dead giveaway.

    Alabama has a great LB tradition, and it is only getting better.

    bigwilly64

  • bigwilly64 said...

    Alabama has a great LB tradition, and it is only getting better.

    Alabama's not bad, but if going off how much total NFL value produced (granted, there are several different ways to judge a position group- this is just one way) at the linebacker position, then here is the top 10 schools all time

    LB ( In terms of NFL value produced)
    1-USC
    2-Penn St
    3-Ohio St
    4-Miami
    5-UCLA
    6-Tennessee
    7-Georgia Tech
    8-Texas A&M
    9-Alabama
    10-Pitt

    NcaaAssassinG13

  • bigwilly64 said...

    Oh God, you've been hanging out with Nova too much. Posting the smiling emoticons is a dead giveaway.

    Alabama has a great LB tradition, and it is only getting better.

    Sure you do, Bama has a great tradition.

    Y'all aren't LBU though, that title remains in State College.

    signature image signature image signature image

    ‏@Cordale10 Why should we have to go to class if we came here to play FOOTBALL, we ain't come to play SCHOOL, classes are POINTLESS

    Texas Lion

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Alabama's not bad, but if going off how much total NFL value produced (granted, there are several different ways to judge a position group- this is just one way) at the linebacker position, then here is the top 10 schools all time

    LB ( In terms of NFL value produced)
    1-USC
    2-Penn St
    3-Ohio St
    4-Miami
    5-UCLA
    6-Tennessee
    7-Georgia Tech
    8-Texas A&M
    9-Alabama
    10-Pitt

    Geez, I definitely wouldn't have put Alabama behind some of those schools. But Im also not sure how the "value produced" numbers are calculated. USC and PSU have produced some great LBs, but I couldn't name more than a handful of LBs from some of the other schools. And I certainly thought Alabama would be higher with alumni such as:

    Lee Roy Jordan
    EJ Junior
    Woodrow Lowe
    Wayne Davis
    Cornelius Bennett
    Derrick Thomas
    Dwayne Rudd
    Demeco Ryans
    Rolando McClain
    Donta Hightower

    Im sure I am missing some others. Somebody like DT could have also been viewed as a D-end too though.

    This post was edited by bigwilly64 on 3/11/2013 at 12:19 PM

    bigwilly64

  • NcaaAssassinG13 said...

    Btw, I'm not saying that the current crop USC LB's takes away the title of LB U, I'm saying that title was taken a long time ago, and I'm not sure exactly why PSU was ever called that in the first place.

    That's why I am saying USC is the real LB U, not just given the name by the "national media". It should be earned, not given. How about this, you tell me why Penn St is the real LB U after comparing the resumes.

    ------------------------------------------------------------USC------------------PSU 1st round NFL draft picks.............................12...........................5 Seasons named All-Pro................................13*........................10 Seasons named to Pro Bowl.........................43.........................26 Hall of Fame(*Seau will be 1st ballot HoF).....0...........................2 Seasons as a primary starter.......................224.......................152 Total amount of LB's w/ AV above 50...........12...........................6 AV rating total value...................................1,627....................1,290 Average AV rating per LB............................27.1......................23.9

    *12 without Cushing's year.

    The only category Penn St leads is HoF's which will be 2-1 when Seau is inducted. Really, it's not even close, anybody who is not being a homer can see that.

    UNC has the greatest LB and defender in the history of football, Junior Seau can't even hold LT56's jockstrap.

    jmsmooth33

  • bigwilly64 said...

    Cry about it all you want, but there was no doubt Alabama had the best team in the country in 2011 and 2012. Feelsgoodman

    You lost to TAMU at home and Les miles gave you the game by his horrible coaching descisions, trust me there is a lot of doubt..

    jmsmooth33

  • jmsmooth33 said...

    You lost to TAMU at home and Les miles gave you the game by his horrible coaching descisions, trust me there is a lot of doubt..

    Ha, cry me a river. Who was better? Are you implying TAMU was better, with their 2 losses at home? Or LSU, whom we BEAT at their house at night? LOL. Alabama was clearly the best team in the country last year.

    bigwilly64

  • bigwilly64 said...

    Ha, cry me a river. Who was better? Are you implying TAMU was better, with their 2 losses at home? Or LSU, whom we BEAT at their house at night? LOL. Alabama was clearly the best team in the country last year.

    TAMU was clearly bettter than your team, the UF loss was Johnny Football's first career start ever. How can you say your a better than a team that beat you in your own house? Who cares they had two losses was there any doubt thye were the bes team in the country at the end of the year by murdering OU in the bowl game.

    This post was edited by jmsmooth33 on 3/11/2013 at 3:29 PM

    jmsmooth33

  • jmsmooth33 said...

    TAMU was clearly bettter than your team, the UF loss was Johnny Football's first career start ever. How can you say your a better than a team that beat you in your own house?

    Not sure I'd say "clearly better." aTm had a +3 turnover margin and the final margin was only 5 points.

    signature image

    psubills62

  • psubills62 said...

    Not sure I'd say "clearly better." aTm had a +3 turnover margin and the final margin was only 5 points.

    That game was also in Alabama considering home field advantage is huge in CFB, TAMU drove the ball on Alabama's defense at will they couldn't stop them.

    jmsmooth33

  • jmsmooth33 said...

    TAMU was clearly bettter than your team, the UF loss was Johnny Football's first career start ever. How can you say your a better than a team that beat you in your own house? Who cares they had two losses was there any doubt thye were the bes team in the country at the end of the year by murdering OU in the bowl game.

    You tried the same shit by mentioning LSU?! TAMU caught us asleep at the wheel, I will give them that. After things settled down, Alabama began controlling the game but got away from what they do best when the game was on the line. If you will notice, there was a decided difference in Alabama's playcalling after that game.

    The bad part about TAMU this coming year is they will no longer be able to sneak up on anyone.

    bigwilly64

  • jmsmooth33 said...

    That game was also in Alabama considering home field advantage is huge in CFB, TAMU drove the ball on Alabama's defense at will they couldn't stop them.

    Like I said, having the benefit of 3 more turnovers and only winning by 5 is not what I would call "clearly better," no matter where it is.

    signature image

    psubills62