Online Now 3458

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2043
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3431
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Who has the talent to stop the SEC?

  • Junes Daddy said...

    Alabama had 103 recruits sign a letter of intent this years four year cycle, and add in the five 5th year seniors and that number goes up to 108. Compare that to ND's 86 and that is 22 more kids to pick and choose from. I undrstand there are going to be loses, but as you could read from up above that ND only lost 8 players total, and that number is high for them compared to normal. Having a coaching change in their cycle would attribute to a lot of them, but come on having 14 more than ND in the same cycle smells a little fishy to me. No wonder they are so deep. The numbers are right there for all to see, I guess it just matters what each individual preferes to see.

    Several of those were JUCO's that only had two years and also guys that left early for the draft. Transfers happen all the time. When you recruit elite kids, they want to play. If they aren't getting the necessary PT they believe they deserve, they move on. Case in point, Phillip Sims.

    Until anyone can prove Saban is forcing kids out, then it's a stupid tin-foil argument. It's not happening because if it was, all these kids would be acknowledging it on social media.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Macdaddy7930

  • Stouds1 said...

    Yet in the last 3 years ATM and the Cocks have beat Bama. Guess that doesn't count as competingshrug

    Yeah, I'm not trying to get Cocks or ATM fans panties wadded. You both have great teams. But neither of your teams have Bama's talent level right now. That's not to say you can't 'compete' with them or even beat them.

    It's like during USC's run under Pete Carroll. Plenty of PAC teams had talent, and on any given Sat they could compete with them. But at the end of the day a team with a great coach and 30 5-star players trumps the team with 4 5-stars. At least 7 out of 10 times.

    brem22

  • Junes Daddy said...

    One thing that has not been mentioned in this over signing topic is that those 85 player limits also include 5th year seniors,which would actually inflate the over signing even more for these teams. One of the biggest problems I have with this whole issue is that each team doing this always ends up right at or around the 85 number even when other circumstances should knock that number down in certain years. (transfers, enter the NFL early, of medical hardships). Example would be Notre Dame this year, 86 scholorships in the four year cycle counting the five 5th year seniors, but they had three kids with medical hardships, one death, and 4 transfers. That left the roster at 78. Now they will try to make that difference up this cycle but looking at the numbers, they will still end up 2-3 short. Now that is recruiting strictly by the numbers, not jumping up to 103 during a four year cycle. I feel if you offer a kid a scholorship and he doesn't live up to your standards, then guess what, that's your problem. There should be no mulligans in this process. When you are constantly allowed 15 mulligans every cycle, you cannot tell me that is not a unfair advantage for that team. ND honors four year scholor- ships and does not force anyone out early, if they miss on a recruit that is their problem and they live with it. Just do a better job of evaluating these kids from the beginning. You don't think ND would have loved to have those extra 7 kids on the roster to fill some of the voids they had in the secondary or offensive line that was hit hard by injuries before this season started.

    Ding. Ding. Ding. We have a winner

    Tempe03

  • theProcess said...

    True, I don't get the slOw-hio state love propaganda. They have consistently proven nothing but that they can't win the big game. Choklahoma is the only team that can come close to rivaling slOw-hio state in suck-on-the-big-stage level of egg laying.

    Hate to use facts but...

    BCS all-time records by school

    www.bcsfootball.org
    signature image signature image signature image

    CFBfan91

  • brem22 said...

    Yeah, I'm not trying to get Cocks or ATM fans panties wadded. You both have great teams. But neither of your teams have Bama's talent level right now. That's not to say you can't 'compete' with them or even beat them.

    It's like during USC's run under Pete Carroll. Plenty of PAC teams had talent, and on any given Sat they could compete with them. But at the end of the day a team with a great coach and 30 5-star players trumps the team with 4 5-stars. At least 7 out of 10 times.

    two things...number 1, that's why they play the game and number 2, Harbaugh had doggy doo doo when he knocked off USC as a 44 point underdog at the Coliseum.

    Coaching matters more now because of more better players. I can't reiterate this anymore... You HAVE to have a great staff now, period.

    CoachGomez214

  • CFBfan91 said...

    Hate to use facts but...

    When I looked at that a couple things jumped out... First one is that the ACC is 2-13 in BCS games. Wow.

    CoachGomez214

  • What about Philon appearing to announce that he is signing with Alabama, but later in the day it is announced that he signed with Arkansas. He never even visited Arkansas. He was originally an Auburn verbal commitment that Saban flipped to Alabama, only to pull the rug out from under him several months later.

    Could you imagine if Urban Meyer flipped Kyle Dodson from Wisconsin, only to screw him on national signing day and have Dodson sign with Iowa or Penn State? Bret Bielema would have called the police instead of Barry Alvarez.

    Nick Saban tries to blame the new signing rules for taking away opportunites, but the bottom line is that he is the one taking away the opportunities. He took two of them away from kids that were committed to him this year. There was no rule that said he had to take those opporunities away. The rule is there to keep him from trying to give out opportunities he doesn't have to give or to keep him from giving opportunities at the expense of taking opportunities away from existing players.

    Every school only gets so many opportunities to give out. When you attempt to give out more than you are allowed to give out and then have to take some of them away you can't cry wolf and say "we HAD to take away some opportunities." No, you didn't. You weren't supposed to give them out in the first place.

    Saban of all the coaches in the SEC should know this. He spent 5 years in the B1G conference during a time in which oversigning was completely banned. He knows how to manage the numbers and managing them under the new SEC rules is much easlier than he had it for 5 years at Michigan State.

    fightfan

  • Macdaddy7930 said...

    Several of those were JUCO's that only had two years and also guys that left early for the draft. Transfers happen all the time. When you recruit elite kids, they want to play. If they aren't getting the necessary PT they believe they deserve, they move on. Case in point, Phillip Sims.

    Until anyone can prove Saban is forcing kids out, then it's a stupid tin-foil argument. It's not happening because if it was, all these kids would be acknowledging it on social media.

    blahblahblah

    signature image signature image signature image

    LegalAlien

  • CoachGomez214591 said...

    two things...number 1, that's why they play the game and number 2, Harbaugh had doggy doo doo when he knocked off USC as a 44 point underdog at the Coliseum.

    Coaching matters more now because of more better players. I can't reiterate this anymore... You HAVE to have a great staff now, period.

    Of course it's why they play the game. I'm just talking about statistics and probabilities. JC intimated that there is not a big difference in talent gap between a team that averages top 15-20 in recruiting and a team that averages top 5-10. I'm saying that's demonstratively, statistically false.

    I agree on coaching. Look no further than Mack Brown.

    Hairballs did not have crap when they steamrolled SC. They had a mondo O line and were running jumbo sets with Gearhart. That game was also Andrew Luck's coming out party. The kid could not miss that game. The second SC would load up to stop the run Luck would throw a laser. But I get your point.

    EDIT: Easiest most obvious point...

    Gators 7 BCS Games (five W's) and 2 NCs.
    A&M 0 BCS 0 NCs
    Cocks: 0 BCS 0 NCs

    But yeah, no difference in talent levels. A&M and USCe recruit on the same "high level" as UF.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by brem22 on 1/9/2013 at 12:20 PM

    brem22

  • brem22 said...

    EDIT: Easiest most obvious point...

    Gators 7 BCS Games (five W's) and 2 NCs. A&M 0 BCS 0 NCs Cocks: 0 BCS 0 NCs

    But yeah, no difference in talent levels. A&M and USCe recruit on the same "high level" as UF.

    Who on earth has ever said TAMu or SCar has won BCS?

    Who on earth has ever said TAMU or SCar recruits on the same level as UF?

    The only people I ever see saying this stuff is non-sec people. No SEC people with a brain would say either of these things you felt the need to point out.

    Stouds1

  • fightfan said...

    What about Philon appearing to announce that he is signing with Alabama, but later in the day it is announced that he signed with Arkansas. He never even visited Arkansas. He was originally an Auburn verbal commitment that Saban flipped to Alabama, only to pull the rug out from under him several months later.

    Could you imagine if Urban Meyer flipped Kyle Dodson from Wisconsin, only to screw him on national signing day and have Dodson sign with Iowa or Penn State? Bret Bielema would have called the police instead of Barry Alvarez.

    Nick Saban tries to blame the new signing rules for taking away opportunites, but the bottom line is that he is the one taking away the opportunities. He took two of them away from kids that were committed to him this year. There was no rule that said he had to take those opporunities away. The rule is there to keep him from trying to give out opportunities he doesn't have to give or to keep him from giving opportunities at the expense of taking opportunities away from existing players.

    Every school only gets so many opportunities to give out. When you attempt to give out more than you are allowed to give out and then have to take some of them away you can't cry wolf and say "we HAD to take away some opportunities." No, you didn't. You weren't supposed to give them out in the first place.

    Saban of all the coaches in the SEC should know this. He spent 5 years in the B1G conference during a time in which oversigning was completely banned. He knows how to manage the numbers and managing them under the new SEC rules is much easlier than he had it for 5 years at Michigan State.

    He was offered a greyshirt and turned it down. Nothing illegal about it. It's not against the rules, so this argument is ridiculous and only showing the butthurt from the entire OSU fanbase. Everyone is still waiting on anyone's sources (facts outside of math on a spreadsheet) to indicate Saban has/is taking away opportunities by forcing kids out.

    There is turnover at every school, so GTFO.

    Turnover on Ohio State roster includes transfers, dismissals - NCAA Football - Sporting News

    NCAA college football news, standings, trade rumors, scores, schedules and more 2012-13 coverage on Sporting News.

    aol.sportingnews.com

    Ohio State football: Bobek will transfer to Minnesota | The Columbus Dispatch

    Former Ohio State football player Brian Bobek will transfer to Minnesota, he informed The Dispatch today. By choosing to play for a Big Ten team, Bobek will lose a year of eligibility. When the center becomes eligible to play in 2013 after sitting out the upcoming seasons because of NCAA transfer, Bobek will have two years of eligibility remaining.

    www.dispatch.com
    signature image signature image signature image

    Macdaddy7930

  • Stouds1 said...

    Who on earth has ever said TAMU or SCar recruits on the same level as UF?

    The only people I ever see saying this stuff is non-sec people. No SEC people with a brain would say either of these things you felt the need to point out.

    If you're going to beak about what I wrote at least read the whole post.. Or at least get a grasp of the context in which I wrote it. Which would be ITT.

    JC intimated that there is not a big difference in talent gap between a team that averages top 15-20 in recruiting and a team that averages top 5-10. He was talking about A&M's recruiting vs FLA's. That they recruit on the "same high level". I said that was laughable.

    Why I pointed out the obvious. I'm not banging on the Cocks dude. They just happened to be in the same discussion.

    brem22

  • Macdaddy7930 said...

    He was offered a greyshirt and turned it down. Nothing illegal about it. It's not against the rules, so this argument is ridiculous and only showing the butthurt from the entire OSU fanbase. Everyone is still waiting on anyone's sources (facts outside of math on a spreadsheet) to indicate Saban has/is taking away opportunities by forcing kids out.

    There is turnover at every school, so GTFO.

    blahblahblah

    signature image signature image signature image

    LegalAlien

  • Tempe03 said...

    Just my opinion. Respect the job you ,just think those teams are over rated year in and year out over past 3-4 years. They have a lot of top tier talent that hasn't lived up to the ink yet either. (out of hs)

    I can't argue with your point there at all.

    E-mail: jc@247Sports.com/Twitter: @jcshurburtt/Instagram jcshurburtt

    JC Shurburtt

  • theProcess said...

    True, I don't get the slOw-hio state love propaganda. They have consistently proven nothing but that they can't win the big game. Choklahoma is the only team that can come close to rivaling slOw-hio state in suck-on-the-big-stage level of egg laying.

    They haven't lost a game under Urban Meyer. 12-0 this season and played a ton of young players. They will have a playmaking quarterback that will be a Heisman contender, a bruising running game and the young talent on defense will be a year older. He has fantastic assistant coaches that can scheme and gameplan with the best of them.

    My article was strictly based on current talent, but "can't win the big game" isn't something that can be used when arguing against. It's an upgraded Ohio State and will only get better.

    E-mail: jc@247Sports.com/Twitter: @jcshurburtt/Instagram jcshurburtt

    JC Shurburtt

  • Okay let me get this straight.

    The SEC isnt really better because their success is the product of two coaches (and that "fact" nullifies any conference achievements)

    Also, that the SEC is better. But only because of oversigning. Even though that the impact and actualities of that phenomenon have been wildly overstated.

    I think we are all leaving one key component. ESPN bias. Can we all at least agree that ESPN is the reason the SEC wins so much?

    Bom274

  • Bom274 said...

    Okay let me get this straight.

    The SEC isnt really better because their success is the product of two coaches (and that "fact" nullifies any conference achievements)

    Also, that the SEC is better. But only because of oversigning. Even though that the impact and actualities of that phenomenon have been wildly overstated.

    I think we are all leaving one key component. ESPN bias. Can we all at least agree that ESPN is the reason the SEC wins so much?

    SEC is the best conference in CFB. People are arguing why. Oversigning and cash payments are the two biggest factors in my mind. Also your conference is the worst (fans wise) in the nation.

    signature image signature image signature image

    LegalAlien

  • LegalAlien said...

    Exactly, that's all we hear from OSU fans. A bunch of useless tin-foil wearing arguments that have no legitimacy, other than number crunching in excel. Continue to be envious of what Saban has done, while trying to find an excuse as to why he and the SEC has been successful the last seven years.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Macdaddy7930

  • LegalAlien said...

    SEC is the best conference in CFB. People are arguing why. Oversigning and cash payments are the two biggest factors in my mind. Also your conference is the worst (fans wise) in the nation.

    Oversigning and cash payments, yet none are currently on probation like OSU. Something strange about this comment.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Macdaddy7930

  • Bom274 said...

    Okay let me get this straight.

    The SEC isnt really better because their success is the product of two coaches (and that "fact" nullifies any conference achievements)

    Also, that the SEC is better. But only because of oversigning. Even though that the impact and actualities of that phenomenon have been wildly overstated.

    I think we are all leaving one key component. ESPN bias. Can we all at least agree that ESPN is the reason the SEC wins so much?

    Oversigning is the main reason they are getting over. Location, coaches, asst salaries, tradition and facilities are others but we all know the number 1 reason. Unless of course, you have your head in the sand. banghead

    Tempe03

  • Tempe03 said...

    Oversigning is the main reason they are getting over. Location, coaches, asst salaries, tradition and facilities are others but we all know the number 1 reason. Unless of course, you have your head in the sand.

    Every conference does the same thing Bama is doing, so get over it.

    attachment
    signature image signature image signature image

    Macdaddy7930

  • brem22 said...

    If you're going to beak about what I wrote at least read the whole post.. Or at least get a grasp of the context in which I wrote it. Which would be ITT.

    JC intimated that there is not a big difference in talent gap between a team that averages top 15-20 in recruiting and a team that averages top 5-10. He was talking about A&M's recruiting vs FLA's. That they recruit on the "same high level". I said that was laughable.

    Why I pointed out the obvious. I'm not banging on the Cocks dude. They just happened to be in the same discussion.

    I think you might be misinterpreting what JC said. I was under the impression he was saying there's not much difference between class number five and class number 10 as far as recruiting rankings each year. The difference is just a couple of kids and not a huge gap in talent between the classes. I don't believe he was trying to say that teams that consistently have top-five classes are the same as teams that consistently have top 15 classes.

    Stouds1

  • Macdaddy7930 said...

    Every conference does the same thing Bama is doing, so get over it.

    No, no they don't

    signature image signature image signature image

    Sir Mix A Lot

  • Macdaddy7930 said...

    What happened in '07 and '08?

    There have been five SEC teams win the BCS, no other conference comes close.

    USc got screwed in 07 they would of smashed Florida, they almost held ND w/o a 1st down for the entire game destroyed OSU and PSU..

    jmsmooth33

  • Tempe03 said...

    Oversigning is the main reason they are getting over. Location, coaches, asst salaries, tradition and facilities are others but we all know the number 1 reason. Unless of course, you have your head in the sand. banghead

    Says the guy who ignores quality analysis (from legit reporters) debunking the oversigning argument.

    First of all, the SEC did not break any rule whatsoever re over signing

    Second, the SEC has instituted new regulations to prevent abuses

    Third, the effect of the 1-2 extra players is minimal, to say the least, in the grand scheme of why the SEC has been winning

    Y'all want to hang your hat on anything on anything in attempt to delegitimize the SEC's dominance, regardless of repeated breakdowns of why the oversigning critique is weaksauce.

    Bom274