Online Now 3355

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 2334
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3511
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

Why shouldn't Michigan St be the favorite to win the B1G?

  • Joester16 said...

    I think MSU's offense will struggle to start the year due to breaking in new guys at key positions. But their defense should help a bit and help bring them along until the offense starts to gel.

    Replacing QBs are hard unless you have guys who push the starter before he leaves.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    Good ole Nigel, someone who rarely gives and opinion and spends all day attacking others. thumbsup

    Nice deflection.

    My opinion was very clear when you mentioned your flawed "starters" system, and it is still clear.

    I can see why you don't want to talk about that though.

    NigelUno

  • maize&blue21 said...

    Replacing QBs are hard unless you have guys who push the starter before he leaves.

    Cousins would have to suffered an injury to have Maxwell be put ahead of him.

    Maxwell has been with MSU for a couple years and knows the playbook. He might start off with bad numbers, but I expect him to get better with every start.

    signature image

    11 National Titles | 42 Conference Titles | 3 Heisman Winners | 78 All-Americans | 37 College Hall of Fame Members

    Joester16

  • Joester16 said...

    Cousins would have to suffered an injury to have Maxwell be put ahead of him.

    Maxwell has been with MSU for a couple years and knows the playbook. He might start off with bad numbers, but I expect him to get better with every start.

    True but there is a big difference between knowing the playbook and having to make adjustments during the game.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21

  • NigelUno said...

    Nice deflection.

    My opinion was very clear when you mentioned your flawed "starters" system, and it is still clear.

    I can see why you don't want to talk about that though.

    You rarely give your opinion, and once again didn't in this instance either.

    Returning starters =/= leaving starters in all cases.

    Case in point, Michigan's DBs.

    Kovacs, started 12 games, returning starter.
    Floyd started 12 games, returning starter.
    Gordon started 10 games, returning starter.
    Countess started the last 6 games, returning starter.
    Woolfolk started 10 games, leaving starter.

    Michigan has 4 returning starters in the defensive backfield. They lost one starter in the defensive backfield. No different than Rocky talking about MSUs oline and White. shrug

    xxmgobluexx

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    You rarely give your opinion, and once again didn't in this instance either.

    Returning starters =/= leaving starters in all cases.

    Case in point, Michigan's DBs.

    Kovacs, started 12 games, returning starter. Floyd started 12 games, returning starter. Gordon started 10 games, returning starter. Countess started the last 6 games, returning starter. Woolfolk started 10 games, leaving starter.

    Michigan has 4 returning starters in the defensive backfield. They lost one starter in the defensive backfield. No different than Rocky talking about MSUs oline and White. shrug

    Cute.

    Want to run through your whole team, and your original analysis of the returning starters?

    Cuz...that was funny.

    Most sane people use this system:

    Starters - Starters leaving = Returning starters (eg., 11 - 3 = 8)

    What was your system again?

    NigelUno

  • maize&blue21 said...

    True but there is a big difference between knowing the playbook and having to make adjustments during the game.

    Good point. Gotta know when to throw the jump balls when the running game gets shut down.

    NigelUno

  • NigelUno said...

    Cute.

    Want to run through your whole team, and your original analysis of the returning starters?

    Cuz...that was funny.

    Most sane people use this system:

    Starters - Starters leaving = Returning starters (eg., 11 - 3 = 8)

    What was your system again?

    What is a starter? 1 game? All 12 games? Have you said what you consider a starter.

    What is your system exactly?

    This post was edited by xxmgobluexx on 2/7/2012 at 5:43 PM

    xxmgobluexx

  • NigelUno said...

    Good point. Gotta know when to throw the jump balls when the running game gets shut down.

    Man you're so funny. We played like shit and almost beat you.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21

  • maize&blue21 said...

    Man you're so funny. We played like shit and almost beat you.

    Wow. You guys take credit for moral victories now? That's kind of sad.

    You played like poop? Our defense have something to do with that? Or you just played like poop for no reason?

    NigelUno

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    What is a starter? 1 game? All 12 games? Have you said what you consider a starter.

    What is your system exactly?

    This is a neat game...how you keep avoiding the questions.

    Just for laughs, I'll answer your question (although we've been over it before)...my system would be the one that sane people use (I even gave an example).

    What was your system again?

    Did it go something like this...(for example)...

    11 - 1 (Hemingway) +1 (Stonum) = 11 returning starters

    (Revised to 11 - 1 = 10 returning starters....unless you can find another guy that started a few games)

    This post was edited by NigelUno on 2/7/2012 at 6:04 PM

    NigelUno

  • NigelUno said...

    Wow. You guys take credit for moral victories now? That's kind of sad.

    You played like poop? Our defense have something to do with that? Or you just played like poop for no reason?

    Man you like to twist words. Did I claim a moral victory? No. I said we played like shit and yet almost beat you guys. If it makes you feel better we played like shit because of the combination of your defense and horrible play calling by our Offensive coordinator.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21

  • maize&blue21 said...

    Man you like to twist words. Did I claim a moral victory? No. I said we played like shit and yet almost beat you guys. If it makes you feel better we played like shit because of the combination of your defense and horrible play calling by our Offensive coordinator.

    OK. I feel a little better now. Thanks.

    NigelUno

  • NigelUno said...

    This is a neat game...how you keep avoiding the questions.

    Just for laughs, I'll answer your question (although we've been over it before)...my system would be the one that sane people use (I even gave an example).

    What was your system again?

    Did it go something like this...(for example)...

    11 - 1 (Hemingway) +1 (Stonum) = 11 returning starters

    I ask you what a starter is in you opinion. How many games does a player have to start to be considered a returning starter to you? 1, 2,3,... All games?
    I gave you my example with Michigan's defensive backfield, do you agree or disagree and can you explain your position?

    I agreed with Rocky on MSUs Dline, lost 2 starters in Worthy and Pickelman (sp), but with White coming back who started the season before getting hurt, retained a guy with starter experience.

    To answer your question, something you avoid or answer indirectly, Michigan lost a starter in Hemingway, we thought we had a guy returning with starter experience in Stonum, that ended up not being the case.

    xxmgobluexx

  • Somebody just merge this with the MSU-um thread.....my god....

    ScottsBadLiver

  • xxmgobluexx said...

    I see your blind homerism is overlooking the fact that an 11-2 Michigan team is returning 9 of 11 starters on Defense, 9 of 11 starters on Offense, punter, kicker, KR, and PR.

    Then I asked you...

    Let me make this really simple for you...you claim that Michigan is returning 9 of 11 starters on offense and defense, so...

    1. Which 2 starters are not returning on offense?

    2. Which 2 starters are not returning on defense?

    Take your time.

    (Now this was designed to show you how silly your "system" was, since you had more than 2 starters leaving on both sides of the ball...but you apparently still don't understand basic math, and how you were manipulating the returning "starters" while basically not counting actual "starters" that were leaving. And, then your system only seems to apply to UM returning "starters", and not MSU's returning "starters". Any other questions about how your system is flawed? Or have I covered everything?)

    NigelUno

  • ScottsBadLiver said...

    Somebody just merge this with the MSU-um thread.....my god....

    I suppose you want to add a poll also?

    NigelUno

  • NigelUno said...

    Then I asked you...

    Let me make this really simple for you...you claim that Michigan is returning 9 of 11 starters on offense and defense, so...

    1. Which 2 starters are not returning on offense?

    2. Which 2 starters are not returning on defense?

    Take your time.

    (Now this was designed to show you how silly your "system" was, since you had more than 2 starters leaving on both sides of the ball...but you apparently still don't understand basic math, and how you were manipulating the returning "starters" while basically not counting actual "starters" that were leaving. And, then your system only seems to apply to UM returning "starters", and not MSU's returning "starters". Any other questions about how your system is flawed? Or have I covered everything?)

    I will answer that for him because I'm right here and will give you an accurate answer. We are losing 4 players on offense, Center David Molk, WR Junior Hemingway, TE Kevin Koger, and RT Mark Huyge. On defense we lose 3/4 players depending on how you look at it. The 3 are DT Mike Martin, DT Ryan Van Bergen, DE Will Heringer, and if you want to count the fourth, DB Troy Woolfolk but he lost his job at CB and at safety before the season ended and only played about 15 or so plays a game.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21

  • maize&blue21 said...

    I will answer that for him because I'm right here and will give you an accurate answer. We are losing 4 players on offense, Center David Molk, WR Junior Hemingway, TE Kevin Koger, and RT Mark Huyge. On defense we lose 3/4 players depending on how you look at it. The 3 are DT Mike Martin, DT Ryan Van Bergen, DE Will Heringer, and if you want to count the fourth, DB Troy Woolfolk but he lost his job at CB and at safety before the season ended and only played about 15 or so plays a game.

    preciatecha

    NigelUno

  • ScottsBadLiver said...

    Somebody just merge this with the MSU-um thread.....my god....

    Or give Nigel his own thread. Anyone who feels like banging their head against a wall for a few minutes can drop by and say hello.

    MrWoodson

  • NigelUno said...

    preciatecha

    No problem.

    signature image signature image signature image

    Damaged goods

    MaizeandBlue21

  • NigelUno said...

    Then I asked you...

    Let me make this really simple for you...you claim that Michigan is returning 9 of 11 starters on offense and defense, so...

    1. Which 2 starters are not returning on offense?

    2. Which 2 starters are not returning on defense?

    Take your time.

    (Now this was designed to show you how silly your "system" was, since you had more than 2 starters leaving on both sides of the ball...but you apparently still don't understand basic math, and how you were manipulating the returning "starters" while basically not counting actual "starters" that were leaving. And, then your system only seems to apply to UM returning "starters", and not MSU's returning "starters". Any other questions about how your system is flawed? Or have I covered everything?)

    This is what you don't get, I was talking about returning starters. Remember Nigel, returning starter =/= not returning starter. Ask Rocky, he explained it earlier also.

    The 9 starters on O I believe we discussed as guys returning with starter experience were Robinson, Toussaint, Hopkins, Stonum, Roundtree, Lewan, Schofield, Barnum, and Omameh. Obviously Stonum isn't returning now.

    The 9 starters on D I believe we discussed as guys returning with starter experience were, Roh, Morgan, Demens, Ryan, Floyd, Countess, Kovacs, Gordon, and I thought somebody besides Heinenger (sp) was returning. I was wrong about Heinenger and admitted as much.

    (Can you explain the basic math to Rocky also, he said the same thing about White returning on the Dline.)

    xxmgobluexx

  • maize&blue21 said...

    I will answer that for him because I'm right here and will give you an accurate answer. We are losing 4 players on offense, Center David Molk, WR Junior Hemingway, TE Kevin Koger, and RT Mark Huyge. On defense we lose 3/4 players depending on how you look at it. The 3 are DT Mike Martin, DT Ryan Van Bergen, DE Will Heringer, and if you want to count the fourth, DB Troy Woolfolk but he lost his job at CB and at safety before the season ended and only played about 15 or so plays a game.

    I agree with the guys leaving. I have no problem admitting that guys like Woolfolk are leaving, but you can't overlook the fact that 4 guys are returning as starters in the defensive backfield. Isn't Countess, who started the last 6 games of the season a returning starter?

    xxmgobluexx

  • Status said...

    Michigan State is pretty terrible... doubt they get past Boise next year

    Glad to see you are still keeping up your hate. I have a feeling before too long you are going to be a fan.

    signature image

    steveschneider

  • Bump for Nigel.

    I ask you what a starter is in you opinion. How many games does a player have to start to be considered a returning starter to you? 1, 2,3,... All games?
    I gave you my example with Michigan's defensive backfield, do you agree or disagree and can you explain your position?

    xxmgobluexx