Online Now 3452

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

On this Board 1986
Record: 7394 (2/14/2012)

Online now 3431
Record: 18710 (2/25/2012)

Boards ▾

The Blue Board

We aren't just committed to college football; we're early enrolling in it.

247Rumors

College football scuttlebutt and scoop- powered by Football Rumor Mill

The Green Board

Where the madness isn't just in March.

Big Ten Board (Beta)

Reply

[clap] for The Michigan Legislature

  • pcgamecock2001 said...

    Unions enter into contracts with the employers, so if you are a member of the union and they get you a good contract (ie better pay and benefits), you will want to pay your dues. If you are not a member of a Union, you will not get the same benefits of the Union Contract and normally employers do not offer the same benefits to non unionize workers bc they want to save money.

    RTW means the Unions will have to prove to the membership they are worth the dues they pay. If not, they can try to negotiate on their own, which normally does not work out great.

    What is the difference between a monopoly or a union that requires everyone to be a member at a shop.

    I'm pretty sure that non-union members get benefits from union contracts.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • There's a lot of pissed off UAW members up here right now lol

    signature image signature image signature image

    Snake Plissken

  • Rocket_Play said...

    I haven't heard a good explanation on how this takes a dime out of Anyone pocket. Why are you against people having choices? If the union is good, people will join. If it isn't, people won't. This puts pressure on the unions to do a better job.

    He's a lawyer. Not saying he works for a union, but lawyers are the people that make the most off them.

    Note: I am a democrat, but also anti-union in most situations.

    BetterOff

  • BetterOff said...

    He's a lawyer. Not saying he works for a union, but lawyers are the people that make the most off them.

    Note: I am a democrat, but also anti-union in most situations.

    If I'm not mistaken, he's studying law with the aspiration to defend corporations vs the "common man" and fails to see irony in his soon to be profession.

    I've got a good friend who practices that type of law, who was always left leaning, and is by far the only person with whom I'd willingly, drunkenly argue politics/religion.

    This post was edited by PTCcock195 on 12/11/2012 at 9:00 PM

    PTCcock195

  • irishyoung420 said...

    lol thought it was 14 hour work days?

    Uphill both ways.

    signature image

    'Just to make it clear, I'm not transferring, I like it here too damn much to leave.' Jordan Kerner

    ejb5212

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    I'm pretty sure that non-union members get benefits from union contracts.

    If that is the case, that law should be changed. I dont like unions but that is the main value they bring.

    signature image signature image

    I lost a sig bet. that is why I have these sigs until November 7, 2013.

    pcgamecock2001

  • The majority of revenue unions take on is from employer contributions anyway. It's likely many of these CBA's will be written so that employer contributions will remain relatively consistent. The hit will come from those individuals that won't remit on their behalf. However, much less revenue is made off of individual remittances.

    The biggest threat to the unions is the reduced leverage they will have with a potential of losing members. Many seem to think unions offer better wages and benefits in comparison to private employers. This just isn't true. Indiana is a great example. Many guys that are members of unions will do union work with union employers and non union work with non union employers. It hasn't really destroyed many unions in Indiana. In fact, a lot of electricians for example, have done work for foreign auto-manufacturers while also doing union work for something like a parking garage.

    It's far from the end of unions. It will likely create a bit more competition for unions to get the best possible deal for their employees. It may hurt the union in the short term, but it may very well help the individuals in the long run.

    To make things even more complicated. Employers pay less to the individuals to make up for union contributions. By taking money out of the employer's hands, they often have a certain amount of dues go towards funds that are kept by unions to subsidize bids on jobs. Union employers have a tough time bidding against non-union employers. To curb the competition, unions contribute to those bids to help the union employers.

    Again, I think the competition will help out in the long run. People are just scared of change, even the democrats.

    Harry Callahan

  • PTCcock195 said...

    If I'm not mistaken, he's studying law with the aspiration to defend corporations vs the "common man" and fails to see irony in his soon to be profession.

    I've got a good friend who practices that type of law, who was always left leaning, and is by far the only person with whom I'd willingly, drunkenly argue politics/religion.

    Who the censored are you to think you know me?

    I'm sorry, but this is just spectacularly ignorant. Regardless of whether or not my first job is a corporate law position, it's mind-boggling that you assume you know what I aspire to do or how perceptive I am of my position in the world. What you know of me based on any online interactions barely scratches the surface of who I am as a person and what I want to do with my life.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • BetterOff said...

    He's a lawyer. Not saying he works for a union, but lawyers are the people that make the most off them.

    Note: I am a democrat, but also anti-union in most situations.

    Read my post on the previous page.

    Not only am I not working for a union, but I'm in no way involved with labor law, nor do I ever intend to do labor law. Saying that lawyers make the most off of unions is, for lack of a better term, silly. It's the type of generic "blame-the-lawyer" ridiculousness that comes from someone who doesn't know to what extent lawyers are involved in or how much they profit from labor disputes.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • Wisconsin passed RTW and now has a balanced budget. The unions said that if RTW passed it would be a failure and thousands of teachers would be fired. As far as I know neither one of those things happened.

    I'm sorry but to me whenever a Dem or union say one thing I know the exact opposite will happen, or when they accuse Repubs of something usually they are the one doing themselves.

    signature image

    We are ND

    condoms USuCk

  • condoms USuCk said...

    Wisconsin passed RTW and now has a balanced budget. The unions said that if RTW passed it would be a failure and thousands of teachers would be fired. As far as I know neither one of those things happened.

    I'm sorry but to me whenever a Dem or union say one thing I know the exact opposite will happen, or when they accuse Repubs of something usually they are the one doing themselves.

    No, Wisconsin doesn't have a balanced budget. Wisconsin's budget is balanced this year, under the cash accounting method. However, under the accrual accounting method (the preferred GAAP option, a method that Scott Walker cited in arguing for state healthcare cuts, and the method that almost every state uses in its accounting), Wisconsin is looking at a $3billion deficit over the next two years.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • CMXI said...

    No, Wisconsin doesn't have a balanced budget. Wisconsin's budget is balanced this year, under the cash accounting method. However, under the accrual accounting method (the preferred GAAP option, a method that Scott Walker cited in arguing for state healthcare cuts, and the method that almost every state uses in its accounting), Wisconsin is looking at a $3billion deficit over the next two years.

    Whether it is cash or accrual, it evens out over the long run. If they choose cash basis, they will have to use it next year as well. Anytime there is a change, they have to make adjustments to show comparative financials. It's not like they can bounce back and forth between the two to show the best possible financials. It's perfectly fine if they choose to use cash basis.

    Harry Callahan

  • condoms USuCk said...

    Wisconsin passed RTW and now has a balanced budget. The unions said that if RTW passed it would be a failure and thousands of teachers would be fired. As far as I know neither one of those things happened.

    I'm sorry but to me whenever a Dem or union say one thing I know the exact opposite will happen, or when they accuse Repubs of something usually they are the one doing themselves.

    Wisconsin doesn't have RTW. I'm pretty sure they got ride of CBA for public sector unions.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • CMXI said...

    Who the censored are you to think you know me?

    I'm sorry, but this is just spectacularly ignorant. Regardless of whether or not my first job is a corporate law position, it's mind-boggling that you assume you know what I aspire to do or how perceptive I am of my position in the world. What you know of me based on any online interactions barely scratches the surface of who I am as a person and what I want to do with my life.

    Struck a chord their apparently. I distinctly recall you discussing working for a corporate vs little man firm while you were in law school and that you wanted to work them post-law school. I remember it it because you refused to acknowledge the irony.

    Sorry you disagree so vehemently, but your world view is in a stage that could be legally aborted by your political view.

    Edit: you should really apply that not knowing people real vs virtual philosophy to to your interactions on this board some time.

    This post was edited by PTCcock195 on 12/11/2012 at 10:19 PM

    PTCcock195

  • PTCcock195 said...

    Struck a chord their apparently. I distinctly recall you discussing working for a corporate vs little man firm while you were in law school and that you wanted to work them post-law school. I remember it it because you refused to acknowledge the irony.

    Sorry you disagree so vehemently, but your world view is in a stage that could be legally aborted by your political view.

    Please point me to this thread you speak of.

    I do work for a corporate law firm, but you make an incredible amount of assumptions and unfounded extrapolations in thinking you know anything about me.

    As for your attempts at insulting my worldview, it's just sad. You speak like you're some authority on world views. How about you provide a single shred of evidence for your opinion of me?

    EDIT: When I form opinions of people, I base it on something - typically, them being wrong about something that's easily provable. You, on the other hand, have yet to provide anything of the sort.

    This post was edited by CMXI on 12/11/2012 at 10:24 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    Wisconsin doesn't have RTW. I'm pretty sure they got ride of CBA for public sector unions.

    Oh. I think you're right. Thanks

    signature image

    We are ND

    condoms USuCk

  • CMXI said...

    Please point me to this thread you speak of.

    I do work for a corporate law firm, but you make an incredible amount of assumptions and unfounded extrapolations in thinking you know anything about me.

    As for your attempts at insulting my worldview, it's just sad. You speak like you're some authority on world views. How about you provide a single shred of evidence for your opinion of me?

    EDIT: When I form opinions of people, I base it on something - typically, them being wrong about something that's easily provable. You, on the other hand, have yet to provide anything of the sort.

    I just think you're political opinion is immature and utopic. It will change once you get out of academia. It's not that my view is empirical, not even close. I would never claim to have a better opinion than anyone else. I've just always been the type to hold my elders, for lack of a better term, in high esteem and they've been been almost prophetic when it comes to political ideology...and I see it in your situation and find if amusing.

    PTCcock195

  • PTCcock195 said...

    I just think you're political opinion is immature and utopic. It will change once you get out of academia. It's not that my view is empirical, not even close. I would never claim to have a better opinion than anyone else. I've just always been the type to hold my elders, for lack of a better term, in high esteem and they've been been almost prophetic when it comes to political ideology...and I see it in your situation and find if amusing.

    Oh, give that a rest. Are you seriously going to pull the "you're too young, you're still a student" line? Shockingly enough, there are plenty of people who understand the world better at a younger age than the vast majority of people do at any age.

    You speak with a certainty that belies your utter lack of evidence for your position. You say I fail to recognize ironies in my position, you say my political opinion is immature, and you say that my views will change once I get out of academia. Do you have a single, credible shred of evidence for any of this? No. You base your assessment of my views on a heavily-biased personal sampling of the elders in your life.

    Speaking of failing to recognize irony, you say that my political opinion is immature and utopic. (For now, we'll ignore the fact that utopic isn't a word, and we'll just assume you used the correct word, "utopian.") Unless you agree that your political opinions are as bad as you perceive mine to be, you saying "I would never claim to have a better opinion than anyone else" is just a load of crap. I haven't had a problem with you before, but this whole sequence is spectacularly idiotic.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • CMXI. Make sure you keep all the dates straight for the paperwork you are doing while you're shaking down companies.

    TroyTide

  • TroyTide said...

    CMXI. Make sure you keep all the dates straight for the paperwork you are doing while you're shaking down companies.

    coffee

    signature image signature image signature image

    "A political call, the fall guy accord...We can't afford to be neutral on a moving train..."

    BamaLivesFootba

  • TroyTide said...

    CMXI. Make sure you keep all the dates straight for the paperwork you are doing while you're shaking down companies.

    Aww, you're cute. lol Still can't play with the big boys intellectually, but you just try so darn hard.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CMXI

  • PTCcock195 said...

    I just think you're political opinion is immature and utopic. It will change once you get out of academia.

    Doesn't that sound kind of... Depressing? Regardless of which side of the fence you fall on? Right or Left, it almost comes off as, "I understand you have high hopes for people and this country, but a few years from now, your learn the world is sh!t and you can't change anything. You'll see."

    Again, I'm speaking non-partisan-ly. It just comes off as a little defeatist IMO.

    signature image signature image signature image

    sf2k4

  • CMXI said...

    Aww, you're cute. lol Still can't play with the big boys intellectually, but you just try so darn hard.

    I know right? I am just not on the same level as an intellectual big boy such yourself. I wish I could recite all the things my liberal professors tried to brainwash me with.

    TroyTide

  • BamaLivesFootba said...

    I'm not a big fan of unions or RTW. I don't think it's the right or fair way to deal with WPU.

    unions were necessary in 1904 when little johnny was working in a pittsburgh steel mill for $1 a week, without safety goggles etc...

    but like most things they've gone way too far and are a detriment to productivity in most cases.

    one of the things that crippled the auto industry was the uaw. trust me, i saw it with my own eyes when i worked at a ford plant. throw in affirmative action and you have trouble.

    much cheaper to manufacture overseas...

    off to work to help people who refuse to work...but can.

    hubcitytider

  • hubcitytider said...

    unions were necessary in 1904 when little johnny was working in a pittsburgh steel mill for $1 a week, without safety goggles etc...

    but like most things they've gone way too far and are a detriment to productivity in most cases.

    one of the things that crippled the auto industry was the uaw. trust me, i saw it with my own eyes when i worked at a ford plant. throw in affirmative action and you have trouble.

    much cheaper to manufacture overseas...

    off to work to help people who refuse to work...but can.

    +1
    funny last comment

    signature image

    3 time POTW, member since 2006, MLWTI: 4-3

    irishyoung