-
USMCAG
- 3 stars Rating: 57
8397 votes total - Heisman
- (24475)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
neoavatara
- 5 stars Rating: 92
2106 votes total - Back-up
- (4959)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BamaLivesFootba
- 4 stars Rating: 68
6681 votes total - The Incorruptibles
- Heisman
- (20626)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
CMXI
- 5 stars Rating: 89
7056 votes total - All Conference
- (10078)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CMXI said...
Good god, it's like you see the name "Obama" and immediately start seeing red and frothing at the mouth.
1. This isn't an "illegal" immigration policy. This would be a change in policy to existing Customs & Border Patrol (CBP) regulations. There's nothing illegal about such a change.
2. All this does is give CBP prosecutorial discretion. This doesn't force CBP to let a single illegal immigrant walk free with amnesty - it simply gives the agency the option to decline to prosecute illegals.
3. The Department of Homeland Security already has this policy in place for Customs and Immigration Enforcement (ICE), so this is nothing new, it just brings CBP's policies in line with the already existing ICE policy.
Read the damn article and do some research before spouting off like an idiot.
USMCAG
- 3 stars Rating: 57
8397 votes total - Heisman
- (24475)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
USMCAG said...
1. Yes there is, its against the constitution. If there's nothing rong with it, then why is he trying to sneak it in.
2. Wrong, its opening a door that shouldn't be opened.
3. Your rationalization sucks.BamaLivesFootba
- 4 stars Rating: 68
6681 votes total - The Incorruptibles
- Heisman
- (20626)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
CMXI
- 5 stars Rating: 89
7056 votes total - All Conference
- (10078)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BetterOff ●
- 5 stars Rating: 87
13447 votes total - 25-9-2 in Tiger Stadium
- All Conference
- (12333)
- 25 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
viningsnole
- 5 stars Rating: 87
104 votes total - Freshman
- (197)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CMXI
- 5 stars Rating: 89
7056 votes total - All Conference
- (10078)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BamaLivesFootba
- 4 stars Rating: 68
6681 votes total - The Incorruptibles
- Heisman
- (20626)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
CMXI
- 5 stars Rating: 89
7056 votes total - All Conference
- (10078)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CMXI
- 5 stars Rating: 89
7056 votes total - All Conference
- (10078)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CMXI said...
All immigration services were absorbed into the Department of Homeland Security in 2003 when DHS enveloped Immigration and Naturalization Services. DHS is a cabinet department established by President George W. Bush, under the control of the executive branch, for the purpose of organizing numerous different executive branch agencies into one department. Included in this department are Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), among others. There's no constitutional issue, because Congress has no claim on any part of DHS or the executive branch's decision-making here.
USMCAG
- 3 stars Rating: 57
8397 votes total - Heisman
- (24475)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
roger huerta
- 4 stars Rating: 80
2149 votes total - Redshirt
- (3319)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
CMXI
- 5 stars Rating: 89
7056 votes total - All Conference
- (10078)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5980 votes total - Starter
- (8831)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
BamaLivesFootba
- 4 stars Rating: 68
6681 votes total - The Incorruptibles
- Heisman
- (20626)
- 27 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5980 votes total - Starter
- (8831)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CMXI
- 5 stars Rating: 89
7056 votes total - All Conference
- (10078)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CMXI
- 5 stars Rating: 89
7056 votes total - All Conference
- (10078)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5980 votes total - Starter
- (8831)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
bhiley77 said...
I don't care if people have abortions, but good luck with the "hurts women" argument.
This post was edited by joetheogre on 6/15/2012 at 2:24 PM
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5980 votes total - Starter
- (8831)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CMXI
- 5 stars Rating: 89
7056 votes total - All Conference
- (10078)
- 15 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
USMCAG said...
1. Yes there is, its against the constitution. If there's nothing rong with it, then why is he trying to sneak it in.
2. Wrong, its opening a door that shouldn't be opened.
3. Your rationalization sucks.Rocket_Play
- 5 stars Rating: 84
10370 votes total - All Conference
- (11412)
- 19 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | ... | 9













obama trying to sneak in illegal aliens