The Real Reason Barack Obama & Michele Lost Their Law License

The Real Reason Barack Obama & Michele Lost Their Law License

  • Hadn't seen this posted on the OT, but I'm sure it will draw some interest, and maybe even some comment.

    ___________

    Bombshell: The Real Reason Barack Obama And Michele Lost Their Law License.
    BY David Herold

    I am reposting for those who have missed it.

    FORMER LAWYERS?

    I knew they had both lost their law license, but I didn't know why until I read this.

    This is 100% legit. I check it out at https://www.iardc.org/ Stands for Illinois Attorney Registration And Disciplinary Committee. It's the official arm of lawyer discipline in Illinois ; and they are very strict. (Talk about irony.) Even I, at the advanced age of almost 65, maintain (at the cost of approximately $600/year) my law license that I worked so hard and long to earn.

    Big surprise.

    Former Constitutional Law Lecturer and U.S. President Makes Up Constitutional Quotes During State Of The Union (SOTU) Address.

    Consider this:

    1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 in order to escape charges he lied on his bar application. A "Voluntary Surrender" is not something where you decide "Gee, a license is not really something I need anymore, is it?" and forget to renew your license. No, a "Voluntary Surrender" is something you do when you've been accused of something, and you 'voluntarily surrender" your license five seconds before the state suspends you.

    2 Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993. after a Federal Judge gave her the choice between surrendering her license or standing trial for Insurance fraud!

    3. Facts.Source: http://jdlong.wordpress.com/2009/05/15/pres-barack-obama-editor-of-the-Harvard-law-review-has-no-law-license/

    4. A senior lecturer is one thing, a fully ranked law professor is another. Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law Professor at the University of Chicago .

    5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school-but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.

    6. "He did not hold the title of Professor of Law," said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.

    Source: http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/03/sweet_obama_did_hold_the_title.html ;

    7. The former Constitutional Senior Lecturer (Obama) cited the U.S. Constitution the other night during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence … not the Constitution.

    8. The B-Cast posted the video: http://www.breitbart.tv/did-obama-confuse-the-constitution-with-the-declaration-of-independence/

    9. Free Republic : In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: "We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal.

    10. Um, wrong citing, wrong founding document there Champ, I mean Mr. President. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads:

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

    11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech?

    When you are a phony it's hard to keep facts straight. Keep this moving — educate others.

    http://beforeitsnews.com/obama/2012/06/bombshell-the-real-reason-barack-obama-and-michele-lost-their-law-license-2288275.html

  • Discussion
  • roflmaololroflmaololroflmao
    lolroflmaololroflmaolol

  • I'm just going to wait and see what the Lefties have to say.

  • wow, talking about scamming and a con artist.

  • Be very careful about posting these email chain letter accusations before fact checking them:

    -------------------------------------------------

    Q: Did Barack and Michelle Obama “surrender” their law licenses to avoid ethics charges?

    A: No. A court official confirms that no public disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either of them, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Besides, The letter failed to deliver on the promise of what the 'real reason' was they lost their law license(s) that couldn't easily be dismissed as gossip, rumor and innuendo.

  • To read this post and more, subscribe now - One Month for Only $1

    Become an Annual VIP member today and get access to VIP content, ad-free forums & more.

    Join
  • Can't believe you took the time to even respond, but good job

  • I was careful enough not to make it my own.

    I know the OT, and that we have plenty of fact checkers that can set straight the record.

  • I am going to wait and see what the Righties have to say...

    They should bring their Birth Certificates...biggrin

  • LOL

  • good to see that Obama is not practicing law= could you imagine the closing statement at your trial= B B B ut uh uh uh my my client bbb is innocent b b b and and and b b the the reason b b b is b b because.................. i'd just say fuck it i'm guilty cause i can't take this shit no moreindian

  • Cool story Bro

  • I'm guessing he voluntarily surrendered his law license because the courts outlawed the use of teleprompters during trial.

  • Hey, there is a reason I did not go into "Obama should get the boot". I was not going to go research the issue, as I generally do not bother with the sideshow crap. I have never got sucked into the birther stuff, for instance. I focus on policy and principles. And you can ask swr22 if that is the case. I had a feeling this was a bogus story, and was waiting for you guys to come up with the proof, or if it was a real story, to see what you guys had to say. Forgive me for not investigating it myself, as I was not that interested but thought you guys would be the interesting ones to watch.

    Carry on.

  • Haha ridiculous, but made me laugh...in class..thanks